Media Swoons Over Biden's "Fiesty," "Firey" Speech -- Before He Even Gives It

Absolute clownshow from the leftist propaganda outlets, as collected by Ed Morrissey.

The Bat-signal went out early and has come out strong, and if Biden wasn't "feisty," it was "fiery."

How do we know it was a Bat-signal? Axios trotted it out before the speech, in an exclusive initially titled "Biden's Feisty Reset" in an e-mail sent around yesterday. Axios later changed it to "Biden plans feisty economic reset." This is what tipped me off for my conversation with Adam, and the results didn't disappoint, so to speak:

Axios after the speech: "President Biden eased Democrats' concerns about his age with a feisty and commanding State of the Union address Thursday night."

NY Times: In-Your-Face Biden Takes on Trump and His Own Doubters

NYT's lead: "This was not Old Man Joe. This was Forceful Joe. This was Angry Joe. This was Loud Joe. This was Game-On Joe."

WaPo front page: Fiery Biden takes on GOP, makes case for second term

WaPo story headline: Biden delivers State of the Union with fiery political tone

WaPo story lead: "President Biden delivered a fiery State of the Union address Thursday night..."

WaPo video headline (I kid you not): "Biden's feistiest State of the Union exchanges" (WaPo really commits to the bit!)

Punchbowl: A feisty Biden blasts GOP foes

Also Punchbowl: "If you are a casual political observer, you tuned into the State of the Union Thursday night and saw a feisty President Joe Biden..." It's a twofer!

Reuters: Biden takes on Trump and Republicans in fiery State of the Union speech

Semafor: "President Biden delivered a fiery stemwinder against Donald Trump in a State of the Union speech that served as a general election preview."

Associated Press: Biden uses feisty State of the Union to contrast with Trump, sell voters on a second term

Worth noting: A look at the URL shows that the AP initially used "fiery" in its headline and replaced it with "feisty" at some point.

More at the link.

I mentioned this last night, but I'll repeat it, as this is going to be my position throughout the whole election:

In most elections, we want the absolutely worst news/worst performance for the opponent.

But here, we do not want the absolutely worst news or worst performance for Joe Biden. Because as his performance falls to the worst possible levels, the odds that he is forced out of the race and replaced by someone new increases to nearly 100%.

I want Biden to do badly -- but not so badly that the whole corrupt Democrat Party decides that it's time to put Pop-Pop in a home.

So I'm not angry at the media boosting Biden. They're actually my allies in this. We need Biden boosted just enough that he remains, in the eyes of the media that actually controls the Democrat Party, nearly, arguably, viable.

I'm -- we're -- in the weird position of having to root for Biden here and there. We can't let this rapist fall below 30% approval.

So I don't fear the temporary 4-7% job approval bump the media will engineer for Biden. I'm counting on it.

Katie Britt gave her own feisty, fiery rebuttal, stating that the American dream has become a nightmare under President Oops I Crapped My Pants.

The left is savaging her, focusing their hatred on the fact that she's Christian, that she's in a kitchen, that she's giving "Lifetime Movie Vibes."

See the replies here for evidence of this.

These people absolutely hate anyone who's normal and decent, but they demand from normal and decent people constant validation and affirmation of their perversions and pathologies.

Fuck them. Respect and tolerance either go both ways or neither way.

Here's something that will cause a meltdown: Every Christian conservative should announce that his pronouns are "Christ is Lord/Christ Is King," and demand that everyone repeat them.

If that's too sacrilegious, how about "Gender Is Real/There Are Two Sexes"?

That's the rule, right? We're all allowed to pick our own pronouns and compel people to repeat them? And that it doesn't matter if these compelled pronouns violate our deeply held beliefs or not, right?

Right?

posted by Disinformation Expert Ace at 12:10 PM

| Access Comments