Quick Tigs

The attorneys for a RICO defendant have warned the "law" partners of Darrius "Sweetdick" Honeycum, Esq., Attorney-at-Schlong, that they should expect to be subpoenaed in the Fani's Felonious Fanny hearing.

CNN, which is gay and stupid and unprofessional:

A current and former law partner to Nathan Wade, the special prosecutor leading the 2020 election subversion case in Georgia, have been told to expect a subpoena to testify at a hearing next month on whether he and the district attorney who brought the case should be disqualified over their alleged affair and financial ties, sources familiar with the matter tell CNN.

The district attorney, Fani Willis, also is expected to be subpoenaed, sources say, and possibly others in her office.

...

In the days since leveling the allegations of the affair in her motion to dismiss the case, Merchant told CNN that she and her team have uncovered more evidence to buttress the claims, including confirming the trips Willis and Wade took were personal vacations, and not work-related business trips.

"I think what's relevant is to look at the personal nature of the trips. These are trips that neither Fani nor Nathan got reimbursement for. They didn't get reimbursement through the county, they didn't get reimbursement through her campaign," Merchant said when asked about the nature of the trips.

Trump has also joined the motion demanding that Fani and her Felonious Fanny recuse themselves to spend more time with their Marital Aids.

Note: Error deleted and unacknowledged. That's how Disinformation Experts like Ben Collins do it, so that's how I do it, too.

NPR is continuing to completely embargo all news about Fani Willis and her Hungry Vaj.

NPR hasn't reported on the scandal of Fulton County, Georgia DA Fani Willis potentially ruining her election-interference case against Donald Trump by having an affair with her married special prosecutor, who took her on vacations with the money she was paying him. No, they were too busy sounding like State-Run Radio on Thursday night by offering a four-minute press release for Vice President Kamala Harris, who's now "taking a more front-and-center role on addressing gun violence" on the campaign trail.

The closest thing to negativity was anchor Juana Summers noting Harris is trying to "court younger voters, who, right now, aren't showing a lot of enthusiasm about voting for President Biden."

Hope you enjoyed that -- you paid for it. Against your will, of course. (Biden-style, we call that.)

Even an Obama judge is forced to conclude that "DEI trainings," when they devolve into mere racial scapegoating and bullying (which is the entire point of them), can give rise to discrimination and racial harassment lawsuits.

Judge Wendy Beetlestone of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania ruled on Jan. 11 that Professor De Piero had solid grounds to proceed in his race discrimination lawsuit despite Penn State's request for it to be dismissed.

Beetlestone said that discussing the "influence of racism on our society does not violate federal law." But when considering whether to allow the professor's suit to progress, she considered the type of CRT training used at Penn State Abington.

"Training on concepts such as... critical race theory can contribute positively... to form a healthy and inclusive working environment," she said. "But the way these conversations are carried out in the workplace matters: When employers talk about race -- any race -- with a constant drumbeat of essentialist, deterministic, and negative language, they risk liability under federal law."

De Piero "was individually singled out for ridicule and humiliation because of the color of his skin," according to the original lawsuit filed by the Foundation Against Intolerance and Racism (FAIR).

When he complained about "the continuous stream of racial insult directed at White faculty," he was told by the director of the Affirmative Action office that "There is a problem with the White race." The administrator went on to say that the professor should attend "antiracist" workshops "until you get it."

I continue to be fascinated by this game being played by hateful minority activists in which they attempt to see how hard they can bully the majority population until the majority population decides it's had enough and it's officially time for Backlash (TM).

It's like playing the highest-possible-stakes version of Press Your Luck. Nowhammiesnowhammiesnowhammies...

It's an interesting strategy, Cotton, we'll see how that works out for them.

I got this from Ed Morrissey, who points out this is the same case we've been discussing here and there for a couple of weeks. This ruling isn't new -- it came out a week or two back -- but FoxNews is just getting to it now. They do report some of the verbiage used in the ruling. (Though, of course, that could be had by anyone looking up the case.)

Sad: Hunter Biden sold $1.5 million worth of -- wait, let me check this, this must be a typo -- no, apparently he calls them his "artworks," and the crackhead whoremonger doesn't mean it as a joke -- but that still doesn't cover his "massive debts."

Don't worry. His "Sugar Brother" will just launder some more money and clear the rest of those debts himself.

Hunter Biden's artwork has sold for $1.5 million to 10 buyers, but it is still not enough to cover his millions of dollars of debt.

Art dealer and gallerist Georges Berges received 40% of the sales while the first son received 60% under their agreement, The Washington Post reported. This means President Joe Biden's son has received about $900,000 for his artwork.

The largest art buyer was Hunter Biden's attorney Kevin Morris, who also loaned the first son $5.9 million between 2020 and 2022 for his tax payments and personal expenses. Morris purchased 11 paintings for $875,000 in total.

At least one Democrat is calling on Biden to Go Full Tyrant and nationalize the Texas Guard so that it cannot be used to defend the state and people of Texas.

Rep. Joaquin Castro (D-Texas) is calling on President Biden to take control of the Texas National Guard if the state defies a Supreme Court ruling that allows U.S. Border Patrol officers to take down the border barriers.

"Governor Greg Abbott is using the Texas National Guard to obstruct and create chaos at the border. If Abbott is defying yesterday's Supreme Court ruling, @POTUS needs to establish sole federal control of the Texas National Guard now," Castro wrote in a Tuesday post on X, the platform formerly known as Twitter.

The Supreme Court didn't tell Texas to do anything or not do anything -- it issued no orders to Texas. What it did was relieve the federal government of an injunction imposed by the appeals court. The federal government is no longer under court orders.

But Texas was under no prior court order, and still isn't.

via Beege Welborne.

If you haven't heard the sleazy bribery tape yet, it's a must-listen. If you've already heard it, Kari Lake does not add much. She does point out that she mentioned this incident soon after it happened, I guess back in March 2023. She says she worked in a mention of it in her CPAC address.

Then she brags on herself a whole bunch.

via Not the Bee, from Anonysaurus Wrecks.

Acid Flashback:

posted by Disinformation Expert Ace at 06:42 PM

| Access Comments