Tucker Re-Interviews Former Chief of the Capitol Police Steven Sund -- the Interview That Fox Fired Tucker Over

Sund was the chief of the Capitol Police on January 6th. He is obviously an important first-hand witness to what happened that day, particularly regarding behind-the-scenes negligence and... connivance?

But Fox News decided that the public doesn't have the right to hear his insights and observations.

Fox News is "real news" like CNN is real news.

Leah Barkouikis at Townhall gathered up the key clips from the 55 minute interview.

Here is some of the important first-hand accounting of that day that Fox "News" decided the public must not know:

Collin Rugg @CollinRugg

BREAKING: Former Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund suggests to Tucker Carlson that General Milley and Acting Secretary of Defense Chris Miller were involved in a coverup on January 6th.

Well well well...

Sund reveals that military leaders were so worried about January 6th that they were considering locking down the city but then mysteriously kept quiet to Sund.

"On Sunday and Monday, they had been discussing locking down the city... because of the concern for violence. You know who issues the permits on Capitol Hill for demonstrations?"

"I do," Sund said.

"You know, who wasn't told? Me. Instead, on January 4th, what does Miller do? He puts out a memo restricting the National Guard from carrying the various weapons, any weapons, any civil disobedience equipment that would be utilized for the very demonstrations or violence that he sees coming. It just doesn't make any sense."

It's almost as if they wanted J6 to happen...

That clip here.

More from that part of the interview:

The Vigilant Fox @VigilantFox

Disturbing Chain of Events Makes Damning Case That January 6 Was Allowed to Happen

Steven Sund, the former Chief of the Capitol Police, was left in the dark in the crucial days leading up to January 6. This communication breakdown, whether intentional or unintentional, hamstrung the response to January 6:

* Before January 6, regular conference calls were hosted by Metropolitan Police. No intelligence was shared about potential threats to the Capitol or harm to Congress members or police officers.

* On January 5, around 1:00 p.m., A conference call coordinated by Steven Sund, the Chief of Capitol Police, included leaders from the Metropolitan Police Department, Steven D'Antuono (Director of the FBI's Washington Field Office), General Omar Jones (Military District of Washington), and General William Walker (Head of the National Guard). No one on the call expressed concerns about the intelligence or potential threats. The head of the Metropolitan Police Department also did not receive specific threat notifications.

* However, a Senate report released in July revealed that Steve D'Antuono received multiple emails on Sunday (January 3), Monday (January 4), and possibly Tuesday (January 5) about potential violence at the Capitol. This was not communicated to the Chief of Capitol Police during their video call.

* The U.S. military, including Acting Secretary of Defense Miller and General Milley, discussed the possibility of locking down Washington, D.C., due to concerns about violence. Despite concerns, Miller issued a memo on January 4 restricting the National Guard from carrying weapons or civil disobedience equipment for January 5 and 6. This affected the National Guard in Virginia and Maryland.

* On January 6, as violence erupted, the Chief of Capitol Police sought assistance, but the National Guard's response was initially restricted due to the January 4 memo. Governor Hogan of Maryland also expressed frustration at being denied permission to respond by the Pentagon.

He also said that the brass was so slow in permitting the National Guard to act that cops showed up from New Jersey, making the long drive down to DC, to begin assisting the DC police before National Guardsmen were allowed to retrieve their anti-riot gear from the armory.

That clip here.

Nancy Pelosi was a key actor in deliberately stopping the National Guard from restoring order:

The Vigilant Fox 🦊 @VigilantFox

Steven Sund Exposes Nancy Pelosi's Role in the Delayed National Guard Response on January 6

@TuckerCarlson: "So this is an event that Pelosi herself has likened to Pearl Harbor and 9/11 -- the worst thing that's ever happened on American soil. And she's in charge of allowing the National Guard to come in and respond, but she doesn't for 71 minutes? What is that?"

That clip here.

I have been very skeptical of claims that Pelosi and Milley and Miller deliberately permitted -- or encouraged -- the riots of January 6th just to make the MAGA brand toxic and finally be rid of a political movement they despised. I was convinced their was negligence and a cover-up of that negligence, but I did not believe that any of this was actually intentional.

I have now been convinced that intentionality is now a very viable explanation for what happened. I'm not convinced that Pelosi, Milley, and Miller schemed to make this happen just to destroy MAGA. I'm still skeptical that people scheme so ruthlessly and diabolically, and further doubt they even have the ability to execute such plans.

Especially the sorts of malignant incompetents such as these. Heckuva job in Afghanistan, Milley.

But I no longer reject this explanation. Enough evidence is present to make this a very valid theory which must be investigated:

The Vigilant Fox @VigilantFox

JUST IN - @TuckerCarlson Questions if Federal Agencies Allowed January 6 to Happen for Political Gain

According to Former Chief of the Capitol Police, Steven Sund, Federal agencies had intelligence suggesting the potential for violence leading up to January 6, including threats against officers, potential use of chemicals, and plans to storm buildings.

Despite this, none of these details were included in the intelligence assessments. Instead, documents from Sund's former intelligence unit on January 4th, 5th, and 6th indicated a low probability of civil disobedience.

@TuckerCarlson remarked, "So, if you were, and I'm not, but if you were conspiracy-minded, you might think that certain agencies concluded there was likely be chaos at the Capitol, and that served their political purposes. And so, they let it happen, and they prevented you from stopping it."

It is very strange that the feds are so protective of the Chief Insurrectionist Ray Epps.

Ray Epps' lawyer: Joe Rogan is more responsible for January 6th than my client, who repeatedly urged protesters to enter the Capitol and was right at the front of the line when barricades where disassembled.

I wonder who's paying Ray Epps' lawyer.

The full interview here:

Conveniently enough, Pelosi's January 6 committee broke the law and "Failed to preserve" -- destroyed -- all of its records so that no one can check up on what they actually heard from witnesses.

FIRST ON FOX: The House select committee that investigated the Capitol riot on January 6, 2021 failed to adequately preserve documents, data and video depositions -- including communications it had with the Biden White House that are still missing -- according to the Republican lawmaker overseeing the GOP investigation into the committee's work.

The now-disbanded "J6" committee, which was run by Democrats and included only two GOP members, has also failed to provide any evidence that it looked into Capitol Hill security failures on the day of the riot, Rep. Barry Loudermilk, R-Ga., chairman of the Subcommittee on Oversight for the Committee on House Administration, told Fox News Digital.

They just happened to "fail to preserve" information that might confirm Sund's allegations.

Whoops!

Whoopsie!

Loudermilk said his staff has had difficulty gathering all the information it needs to investigate Rep. Bennie Thompson's handling of the J6 investigation.

"Part of our task as this oversight subcommittee is to actually address the security failures, look into how did it happen... how were these folks able to get into the Capitol," Loudermilk said. He said the documents they obtained came over in boxes and was completely unorganized.

"Nothing was indexed. There was no table of contents index. Usually when you conduct this level of investigation, you use a database system and everything is digitized, indexed. We got nothing like that. We just got raw data," he said. "So it took us a long time going through it and one thing I started realizing is we don't have anything much at all from the Blue Team."

The "Blue Team," as described by Loudermilk, represents the group within the J6 committee that was directed to investigate security failures at the Capitol. Loudermilk explained that sources have told him the Blue Team was essentially "shut down" by the committee in order to focus on placing the blame on former President Trump.

"We've got lots of depositions, we've got lots of subpoenas, we've got video and other documents provided through subpoenas by individuals. But we're not seeing anything from the Blue Team as far as reports on the investigation they did looking into the actual breach itself," he said.<

"What we also realized we didn't have was the videos of all the depositions," Loudermilk added.

That's from Fox "News." Gee thanks for transcribing an interview. You're really going all-out to provide your viewers with the best, most penetrating investigative reporting.

What other critical, newsworthy stories has Fox "News's" mostly-female, all-liberal executive corps decided that its viewers should not be allowed to see?

Not only must a possible conspiracy behind the true architects of J6 -- Pelosi, Milley, Miller -- be investigated, to determine if their authorship of the chaos was merely negligent or criminally intended -- but Fox "News" must be made to answer why they decided to censor the news as hard as CNN censored the Hunter Biden laptop story.

posted by Ace at 12:06 PM

| Access Comments