Ana Navarro: The Hunter Biden/Joe Biden Chinese Shakedown Scandal Is "A Story of a Father's Love"

Whoops. Sorry about that. I made the error with the question mark inside the brackets again. I guess, like Hunter Biden, I was high on crack cocaine.

Video below the fold.

It is now known that Hunter Biden sent a threatening WhatsApp message to a Chinese communist party official demanding payment for past deals, telling him that Joe Biden is "sitting right next to me" also waiting for that money, and threatening to use Joe Biden's political connections to burn the Chinese communist official down if he didn't pay up.

Hunter Biden's lawyer, acting in Joe Biden's interests and not Hunter's, claimed that we can't rely on Hunter Biden's words for proof that his father was in the room with him, because Hunter Biden was high on crack and was therefore either lying or couldn't distinguish reality from literal Pipe Dreams.

I say that this is a statement designed to help Joe Biden because, well, it is. He threw his client under the bus as a crack addict who literally cannot be trusted even about the most basic facts because is brain is too rotted by crack and meth.

Gee I wonder who's paying this lawyer.

Jonathan Turley calls Hunter Biden's lawyer's claim that he's too high on crack to be trusted on devastating information about Joe Biden "the 7 percent solution," referencing Sherlock Holmes' addiction to a 7% solution of cocaine.

He notes that the "crack addict defense" has some problems.

On one hand, the Biden Crime Family wants to claim that Hunter Biden was a capable man who deserved the $50,000 per month he was receiving from Burisma.

On the other hand, the Biden Crime Family is claiming that Hunter Biden was literally such a shambles that he routinely lied about his father or sometimes just hallucinated his presence.

In the first few years of the scandal, Biden associates -- and Hunter himself -- emphasized that he was a highly educated lawyer with executive-level experience to offer these companies. Back then, he was insulted by the notion that he was unqualified to sit on boards for companies like Burisma. He told ABC News reporter Amy Robach to "say it nicer" when she raised the subject of allegedly using his connections to his father.

Another problem is that Hunter did not appear to have any chemical-based challenge in allegedly maintaining what has been described by accusers as a global, multimillion-dollar influence-peddling scheme. As I noted last year, the fact is you can be an addict or an alcoholic and still be capable (or culpable).

Even more troubling is how members of the Biden family apparently continued to work with him on these deals despite his reported addiction. Before becoming the designated defendant of the Biden family, he was the conduit for millions in revenue, including alleged transfers to other Biden family members.

The Justice Department also appears to have latched on to the 7% solution. Rather than prosecuting Hunter Biden for a felony in lying on a federal gun form, it is sending him into a diversion program due to an addiction that he says he was able to break years ago.

Now, however, he is portrayed as a junkie emailing threatening messages to foreign figures, demanding (and apparently receiving) millions of dollars. It is little more than an elite version of an addict panhandling in Times Square -- except that Hunter apparently panhandled effectively in different countries for almost a decade, reportedly using a web of more than 20 LLC corporations and banking accounts.

Hunter Biden's 7% solution won't do much to help the public resolve what really happened here -- but it may help those in Washington who prefer to discuss addiction instead of corruption.

Former Biden spokesman, now Biden spokesman on MSNBC, Jen Psaki similarly claims that Hunter Biden's presence at a state dinner for the Indian PM Modi "was absolutely not good optics," but the invitation was justified by the frail degenerate gangster "wanting to show that he loves his son."

JEN PSAKI: Such a good question, Mike. I don't spend too much time on right-wing websites, but I completely concur with what you're saying about what's out there and the challenge the White House has right now. I mean, for them, if you're sitting in a White House right now, you're putting your head down around all of these investigations. They're not going to comment, or that is their strategy, on the specifics of any of Trump's legal woes. And the same thing on Hunter.

I think, you know, what we saw with Hunter appearing at the state dinner was, in my suspicion was the president, his son wanted to come, so his son's going to come to the dinner.

Was that optically easier for the White House and the White House communications team? Absolutely not.

But I suspect that was more in the family circumstance of him wanting to come and wanting to, just the president wanting to show that he loves his son and he's standing by him.

posted by Ace at 02:13 PM

| Access Comments