« The Morning Rant: Minimalist Edition |
Main
|
Weird But the Media Aren't Interested At All in the Michigan State Shooting, Huh? »
February 16, 2023
Project Veritas: Psych! We Were Just Kidding About Firing James O'Keefe
The executive director of Project Veritas says that this is all a misunderstanding and fake news -- they did ask employees for... comments about James O'Keefe. This is a downplayed reference to what was alleged to be a "struggle session," with employees berating O'Keefe for his abrasive management style.
But they say they never even considered firing James O'Keefe, and he's just enjoying a needed vacation.
This is all bullsh!t, because if this were true, James O'Keefe would not have refused comment even to his allies for a week.
But it seems that the board is retreating from its plan, or notion at least, of removing James O'Keefe.
The tryhard spin from Project Veritas is cringe, as the kids say:
Here's a link to the post with the picture of O'Keefe's stacked girlfriend.
I imagine that O'Keefe is abrasive. I wouldn't guess that all the employees are just making stuff up. Although... they probably employ a lot of Millennials, and you know, with Millennials, if you're not praising them and validating them, you're literally causing harm and making them unsafe and denying their right to exist.
So who knows. But the board of directors aren't Millennials, I don't think, so they wouldn't consider removing O'Keefe if this was just some silly Millennials squealing.
And do conservative Millennials act like that?
Anyway, whatever they were plotting, they seem to have stopped plotting that.
Below, a humorous video released in which Project Veritas "stings" themselves. It's a parody of the situation and allegations about James O'Keefe.
Did he really steal a sandwich? Dick move -- no one should ever lay hands on someone else's sweet, sweet sammy, as Rich "Psycho" Giamboni can tell you* -- but not really grounds to fire the company's founder.
* Don't comment on old threads; the system will autoban you. We started that because comment spammers would randomly spam old threads, so I figured, if someone comments in an old thread, it's 99% likely to be a comment-spam bot.