German Study: The Covid-19 Vaccine Caused Death: the Death of Otherwise Healthy People

They say that all vaccines have adverse reactions.

Or at least they said that until covid-19, when, for two years, you weren't allowed to say that the covid vaccine had any adverse reactions. It was the world's first Perfect Vaccine, like the 2020 election was the world's first Perfect Election.

A German study finds that among those adverse reactions is, sometimes, actual death.

David Strom:

First things first: there is no way to know for sure how common this is due to poor screening and reporting, but German researchers have decisively demonstrated through autopsy that the COVID-19 vaccine-induced myocarditis was the cause of death in 5 patients they autopsied after sudden deaths experienced shortly after COVID-19 vaccination.

The study was published in the peer reviewed journal Clinical Research in Cardiology. The doctor sharing the study is a Johns-Hopkins professor and graduate of the Harvard School of Public Health, so not a nobody in the public health world.

The study itself is very convincing, as it is based not upon a statistical analysis of deaths based upon ICD codes or anything like that. It is based entirely on autopsies conducted by the researchers themselves, all in a single hospital on patients who had experienced sudden deaths following shortly after COVID-19 vaccinations using mRNA vaccines. mRNA are apparently the vaccines likely to cause the adverse reactions.

They do no analysis of relative risk between COVID infection and vaccine reactions, and understandably so. It is essentially impossible to do that given that almost everybody has been infected by COVID at some point, but the precise numbers are unknown. Hence there is no definitive way to compare the relative risks, although it is known that COVID itself can cause myocarditis, as can other viral infections.

However, it is pretty clear that the risk is not insubstantial, given the fact that 5 patients were identified in a relatively short period of time at one hospital alone in Berlin.

Shut up, Science Denier. It's the world's first Perfect Vaccine.

This is how we do Science now: We have all the politicians of the left line up and yell dogma and focus-group-tested attack lines at everyone until they comply with The Science (TM).

Meanwhile, also via Strom, a whistleblower from EcoHealth -- but not one who worked there at the time of the grants to the Wuhan lab -- says that yes, covid was in fact made at the Wuhan bat virus manipulation lab.

From The Sun:

In his new book -- The Truth About Wuhan -- whistleblower Dr Huff claims the pandemic was the result of the US government's funding of dangerous genetic engineering of coronaviruses in China.

The epidemiologist said China's gain-of-function experiments -- carried out with shoddy biosecurity -- led to a lab leak at the US-funded Wuhan Institute of Virology.

"EcoHealth Alliance and foreign laboratories did not have the adequate control measures in place for ensuring proper biosafety, biosecurity, and risk management, ultimately resulting in the lab leak at the Wuhan Institute of Virology," he said in his book, an exclusive pre-release copy of which was provided to The Sun Online.

EcoHealth Alliance had been studying different coronaviruses in bats for more than ten years with funding from the National Institutes of Health -- and developed close working ties with the Wuhan lab.

Dr Huff, who worked at EcoHealth Alliance from 2014 to 2016 and served as vice president from 2015, worked on the classified side of the research programme as a US government scientist.

The army veteran, from Michigan, said the organisation taught the Wuhan lab the "best existing methods to engineer bat coronaviruses to attack other species" for many years.

And he claimed "China knew from day one that this was a genetically engineered agent".

...

In 2009, the Wuhan lab started working with the EcoHealth Alliance on a USAID programme -- called PREDICT -- focusing on emerging pandemic threats.

PREDICT was designed to help detect and find zoonotic viruses with pandemic potential -- including coronaviruses.

Shi Zhengli -- the Wuhan virologist who famously became known as "Batwoman" -- hoped the programme would create an early-warning system for pandemics.

Anthony Fauci isn't certain who that is, according to his sworn deposition. He has trouble with "Asian names."

But in 2014, Dr Huff was asked to review a funding proposal which revealed that gain of function work was being carried out to create SARS-CoV-2 -- which causes Covid.

Gain of function work sees viruses souped up to more easily infect humans to help researchers test scientific theories, develop new technologies and find treatments for infectious diseases.

But the risky research method can pose safety and security concerns -- and it's banned in many countries.

It was originally banned in the US in 2014 -- but was reintroduced by the NIH in 2017.

During the chaotic time of the presidential transition, Anthony Fauci snuck through a change in definition of what "gain of function" was, for purposes of the ban, that would allow most gain of function research.

And then, having specifically engineered a loophole to allow him to fund gain of function research, he claims he didn't know that when he funded EcoHealth and the Wuhan lab -- who had for years done gain-of-function research on bat viruses -- that they would use his (our) money for gain-of-function research on bat viruses.

One more thing: The brains of teenagers even look different after the Fauci's forced lockdowns.

The stress of living through pandemic lockdowns has accelerated aging in the brains of teenagers. The effects are similar to those previously observed as a result of violence, neglect, and family dysfunction.

Even if you've left adolescence far behind, you might remember that it can be a tumultuous time in terms of thoughts and feelings, and there's a lot of reorganizing that goes on in the brain -- even without a global pandemic and the associated lockdowns.

A recent study by researchers from Stanford University and the University of California, San Francisco, concluded the pandemic had 'sped up' some of this reorganizing, thinning of the cortex and increasing the size of the hippocampus and the amygdala sections of the brain.

"We already know from global research that the pandemic has adversely affected mental health in youth, but we didn't know what, if anything, it was doing physically to their brains," says psychologist Ian Gotlib, Director of the Stanford Neurodevelopment, Affect, and Psychopathology (SNAP) Laboratory in California.

The team looked at magnetic resonance imaging ( MRI) brain scans of 81 children taken before the pandemic (between November 2016 and November 2019), and 82 children taken during the pandemic (between October 2020 and March 2022) but after lockdown restrictions had eased (spring 2020, in California).

Next, the researchers matched children from both groups using factors including sex, age, pubertal status, ethnicity, early life stress, and socioeconomic background, to give them multiple comparison points.

What the scans showed was that the brain aging process had seemingly accelerated in the post-pandemic group. Lockdown periods of less than a year had resulted in the equivalent of three years of brain aging in the second selection of youngsters.

Poorer mental health was also noticed in the post-pandemic group, though it's not clear if that's directly related to brain age. What this study can't tell us is whether these changes are going to be permanent, or whether there are further mental health problems that will arise from the accelerated changes in these key brain structures.

"Will their chronological age eventually catch up to their 'brain age'?" asks Gotlib. "If their brain remains permanently older than their chronological age, it's unclear what the outcomes will be in the future.

posted by Ace at 03:05 PM

| Access Comments