« Diabolical: Democrats Inserted Provision Into "Inflation Reduction Act" Giving EPA Right to Control Carbon Dioxide -- Which the Supreme Court Had Just Ruled It Did Not Have the Right to Regulate |
Main
|
Boopnose Cafe »
August 24, 2022
Marjorie Taylor-Greene Swatted;
Fox News: She's a "Particularly Divisive" Member of Congress So, You Know, She Was Pretty Much Asking For It, Right?
Fox News: Liberals in Hannity Clothing.
Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., says he was "swatted" at her home at 1 a.m. on Wednesday.
Greene made the announcement on Twitter and thanked law enforcement for handling the situation professionally. The term "swatting" refers to the illegal practice of making false police reports in an attempt to get law enforcement to raid the home of an innocent person.
"Last night, I was swatted just after 1 a.m.," Greene wrote on Wednesday morning. "I can't express enough gratitude to my local law enforcement here in Rome, Floyd County."
Fair enough.
And now it's time to suggest that maybe this victim should be blamed.
Greene is a particularly divisive member of the Republican Party and has had to apologize multiple times for making outlandish claims.
Oh.
What's that doing there?
Maybe they inserted that to distract from this:
The caller then made a second, voice-masked call to the police department, stating that they made the false report in reaction to Greene's stance on the transgender movement, according to the outlet.
Can't have a trans extremist taking the blame for something a trans extremist did. At least, not without spreading the blame around.
Are trans extremists also particularly divisive, or nah?
Tell me, if a reporter got sucker punched on the street, hypothetically, would the media note all the bias in the reporter's "journalism" to point out why he might have deserved the beat-down?
In case Fox's cadre of Liberals Gone Wild decide to "update" and "clarify" the story:
Mike Howell
@MHowellTweets
The swatting of a Member of Congress would be a block out the sun level event if it happened to anyone but @RepMTG
Yup. We live in a perfect Leninist "Who, whom?" world.
That is a reference to Lenin's statement that one can only judge the importance of political crimes by asking "Who?" and "Whom?" Who did it, and whom was it done to? If the right people did it to the right people, then it wasn't a crime at all; it was a great victory for the Soviet state.