OUT: The FISA Court Only Issues Surveillance Warrants With Compelling Evidence
IN: Federal Judges Only Issue Warrants to Raid Presidents With Compelling Evidence

Below the fold, "Fusion Ken" Dilanian basically says the exact same things he did about how hard it is to get a FISA surveillance warrant, and how the very fact The Regime secured one against Trump proves that the evidence against him is bountiful, robust, and impeccable.

Excuse me, Fusion Ken, but we've heard all of this before, and heard it from you before, haven't we?

In the Empire of Lies, all citizens are required to forget everything The Regime did a month or more ago.

I'll believe it when I see it. As Kyle Sheidler points out, the Senate Republicans rolled over when the Criminal Wray decided he was going to play hooky on their committee and take a jet they had given him to go on a weekend vacation.

After years of shrieking that it's too dangerous to the Republic to even talk about going after Hillary Clinton for her many crimes, NeverTrump is clapping like seals about Biden weaponizing the federal government to go after the likely 2024 GOP nominee.

Maybe it's time for governors and all right-thinking local governments to end all cooperation with the FBI.

I renew a suggestion for an action that all Americans can take to show their rejection of Oligarchic Rule: Automatic acquittal in all federal prosecution cases until the federal government is reformed. They can't prosecute and terrorize the population if jurors -- guaranteed in criminal trials by the Constitution -- automatically refuse to convict.

You can't trust a prosecution brought by a criminal gang, obviously.

It's always the same people -- and the same people cited for malfeasance by the IG:

Of course, they keep being put on these cases because they weren't guilty of "malfeasance." They did exactly what The Regime asked of them. And so they are rewarded.

Even this cvck gets it:

And this one, of course, does not:

#MuhPrinciples, amirite?

This is funny, but it makes a good point: There is obviously evidence that Hunter Biden has committed a lot of crimes, and yet there are no raids on his home.

There is also evidence that Joe Biden committed crimes with him.

Conclusive proof? No, not yet -- but that's why you issue warrants to conduct raids on people's homes. To get that proof.

Now, in the past, even though there is probable cause to believe Joe Biden committed crimes, we would say: "But we must restrain ourselves. This is a president we're talking about. We do not send the FBI over to raid his house because we have probable cause to suspect he was running a foreign influence-peddling operation with his dirtybag crackhead son."

But that was in the past.

What restrains us now?

If we see a Democrat -- any Democrat, including one running for any office -- for whom we have any probable cause of suspicion of committing any crime, send the police raiding parties, slap on the leg irons.

And what will NeverTrump say then about MuhNormzzz? They've blessed this tactic every single time it's been deployed against Trump or his people.

Is it time for them to decloak and admit simply that they are Democrats and urge a different rule for Democrats just because Democrats believe in a separate rule for Democrats?

posted by Ace at 12:00 PM

| Access Comments