Private Plane Addict "Prince" Harry Rants Hypocritically About Climate Change; Also Becomes Instant Twitter Expert on Abortion Law, Because Of Course

He spoke at the UN, supposedly to honor Nelson Mandela, but mostly to honor himself and to increase the value of his influencer "brand."

Peter Murphy writes today in The Federalist about the speech, and has written earlier of the fundamental fraudulency of "prince in name only Harry Windsor" and his wretched influencer wife claiming to be champions of environmental austerity.

The fact that Harry and Meghan live in a 9-bedroom, 16-bathroom mansion in the Montecito enclave of Santa Barbara, California, drive a Cadillac Escalade SUV and still use private jet travel evidently are beside the point. They made the choice of stopping at two children so as to not add to their family’s long-term carbon footprint. This begs the question, why does a family of four need triple the number of bedrooms? Would not, say, five bedrooms be enough to obviate bunkbeds and host visitors?

Their extravagant home looks as an upgrade from their royal digs when they lived in London as newlyweds, at the Frogmore Cottage. Though their Montecito pad has one fewer bedroom, it appears to have more appurtenances.

James Melville, whose tweet is posted below, notes that "Prince" Harry has reportedly taken 21 private plane trips the past two years, while demanding everyone else live like a hermit for the sake of the enviroment.

Meanwhile, he's also yammering about the Dobbs decision:

From the horrific war in Ukraine to the rolling back of constitutional rights here in the United States, we are witnessing a global assault on democracy and freedom.

Conservative policy analyst Nile Gardiner thinks it's time to strip "Prince" Harry of his debased title:

Nile Gardiner @NileGardiner

Prince Harry is increasingly just a mouthpiece for Meghan Markle's far Left political activism. A sad decline for a once hugely popular figure. He is actively undermining the British Monarchy by engaging in political attacks, and damaging the image of the Royal Family in America.

By launching political interventions like this, Harry is fundamentally undermining the Monarchy, which is no doubt exactly what his boss Meghan demands. It is staggering how Harry and Meghan still retain their Royal status. Their titles should be removed.

As regards abortion, American law now entrusts laws about abortion to the legislature, the same as "Prince" Harry's former homeland of the United Kingdom.

As far as the actual abortion laws in the United Kingdom: On first read, you might believe they're restrictive:

In England, Scotland, and Wales, abortion is permitted on the grounds of:

risk to the life of the pregnant woman;

preventing grave permanent injury to her physical or mental health;

risk of injury to the physical or mental health of the pregnant woman or any existing children of her family (up to a term limit of 24 weeks of gestation); or

substantial risk that, if the child were born, he or she would "suffer from such physical or mental abnormalities as to be seriously handicapped".

That third category, called "Ground C," is the grounds for justifying 98.1% of all abortions in the UK. Note the language, "risk of injury to the physical or mental health." Well, any pregnancy entails some risk to the physical health of the mother, and every pregnancy carries the guarantee of several mental health problem -- stress, anxiety, possibly depression -- for the mother. So essentially Ground C guarantees abortion for any reason up to 24 weeks.

Which is still much more limited than the until-the-moment-of-crowning law in much of the United States, and which was mandated by the Supreme Court until they permitted states to begin restricting that a bit.

From the weekend: " " " Prince " " " Harry's friends (he had friends?) called him "f***ing nuts" for even dating Meghan Markle, who they thought was a joyless, humorless SJW scold.

Prince Harry's Eton friends called him 'f***ing nuts' for dating Meghan Markle who 'reprimanded them for their jokes about sexism, feminism and transgender people', new book claims

Prince Harry's Eton pals called him 'f***ing nuts' for dating Meghan Markle, 40
Harry invited Meghan to join him at Sandringham for his weekend shoot in 2016

He invited 16 friends, mostly from Eton, after getting permission from Queen

According to a new book by journalist and author Tom Bower, Meghan was less than impressed and 'challenged every guest' who 'contravened her woke values'

Book also said Queen was relieved Meghan did not attend Prince Philip 's funeral

Also claimed Meghan phoned PR firm in 'hysterics' after palace interview fury

Bower says the Duke of Sussex was 'looking forward' to 'endless banter' with his friends - but Meghan, 40, was less than impressed and 'challenged every guest' who 'contravened her woke values'.

Meghan 'lacked any sense of humour' and was a 'dampener on the party', Bower says in his new book, according to The Times newspaper.

'She lacked any sense of humour. Driving home after Sunday lunch, the texts pinged between the cars: 'OMG, what about HER?' said one. 'Harry must be f***ing nuts'.'

...

Bower claims Meghan 'reprimanded guests' if they made the 'slightest inappropriate comment' and 'nobody was exempt'.

The book also discusses her belief that her perfunctory attempts at charity made her Princess Diana reincarnated, and that everyone should acknowledge this.

The book also tells how she and Harry's 16-day tour of Australia made them think they could achieve great things together.

Bower wrote: 'The Sussexes had convinced themselves that their Australian success blessed them with Diana's magic.

'Meghan could not understand that Diana had won the public's affection after years of work.

'Neither she nor Harry could grasp that emulating Diana required time, to weave a narrative and create a brand from which influence would flow.'

The claims comes after it was revealed Meghan 'called her PR team in hysterics' after Buckingham Palace reacted with 'fury' to 'her Vanity Fair interview about Prince Harry'.

Bower says Meghan was 'ecstatic' when she was asked to appear on the cover of Vanity Fair's September 2017 issue and do an interview with the magazine.

But when the magazine ran with the headline 'Wild About Harry' on its cover - focusing on Meghan's relationship with the British prince rather than her work as an actor, activist and philanthropist - Bower says the Palace was taken aback.

Within hours of the magazine's pre-publication copies being sent to Buckingham Palace, Bower says Meghan phoned her PR firm and 'hysterically' told them of the Palace's fury.

Bower reports that Meghan was furious that the piece was not more focused on her philanthropy but says this was due to the fact Vanity Fair researchers were unable to substantiate two key stories she had told about her activism as a young child.

In other words, she lied.

As Hunter Biden would say when in a British rehab center, Meghan Markle is a "spoilt c*nt."

I absolutely cannot wait until she fully c*cks "Prince" Harry and begins openly carrying on spectacularly cheap and gaudy affairs in front of the world press, calling photographers in advance to "ooops!" catch her and her paramours in compromising moments.

posted by Ace at 03:38 PM

| Access Comments