Sponsored Content

Intermarkets' Privacy Policy

Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!

Recent Entries
Absent Friends
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

Reports: Ezra Miller Out at Warner Bros. As Second Allegation of "Grooming" Lodged by Family of 12-Year-Old Girl | Main | Police Response to Uvalde Shooter Was Even Worse Than Thought: Cops Had All the Guns and Bullet Proof Shields They Needed, Could Have Killed Shooter in "Three Minutes;"
Didn't Even Try Opening the Door, WHICH WAS UNLOCKED THE WHOLE TIME
June 21, 2022

Again! Democrat Senators Pressured Google to Censor Search Results for Pregnancy Crisis Centers, to Steer Searchers Towards Abortion Clinics

Using monopoly power to impose a would-be monopoly political position.

Democrats ask Google to "limit the appearance" of anti-abortion clinic results. It would be good if people searching Google for information on abortion were presented with the most relevant and scientifically rigorous information, just as it would be good if Google results didn't tell someone with a leg cramp that he might be dying of some rare disease. But for this to happen, tech company employees would have to be both perfect arbiters of the truth and also able to personally vet heaps and heaps of websites. Since that is impossible, we settle for a system where Google serves up an array of web links and lets individuals take from this content what they will.

This upsets some politicians, who think Google should be serving up only government-approved information. In the latest iteration of this phenomenon, 21 senators have sent a letter to Google CEO Sundar Pichai complaining that people who search for information about abortions may be led to websites for crisis pregnancy centers.


If Google decided to ban crisis pregnancy center advertisements, that would be one thing. I don't think that would be a good idea, since I think we benefit when tech companies trying to remain relatively apolitical. But as a private company, Google is perfectly free to make that choice.

But whichever choice it makes, it should make it free of political pressure.

In their letter to Google, the senators--including Dianne Feinstein (D--Calif.), Bernie Sanders (I--Vt.), Elizabeth Warren (D--Mass.), and Amy Klobuchar (D--Minn.)--give the impression that all crisis pregnancy centers falsely represent themselves as abortion clinics. "We write today regarding disturbing new reports that Google has been directing users who search for abortion services towards anti-abortion 'fake clinics,' also known as 'crisis pregnancy centers' or 'pregnancy resource centers,'" they state.

They call on Google to "limit the appearance of anti-abortion fake clinics or so-called 'crisis pregnancy centers' in Google search results, Google Ads, and on Google maps when users search for 'abortion clinic,' 'abortion pill,' or similar terms." They ask that Google attach disclaimers to crisis pregnancy center websites that appear in search results.

But it's inaccurate to suggest all crisis pregnancy centers are masquerading as abortion clinics. And those that are doing this in a way that runs afoul of the law should be dealt with by the legal system, not by federal lawmakers exerting censorial pressure on a private company.

I just searched National Review for "google feinstein."

No returns.

National Review screams every time Josh Hawley, a Republican, says he wants to modify s.230 to condition immunity on good faith, nonpartisan decisions in moderation and search ranking, but National Review is absolutely silent when Democrats are proven again and again to be using government to use Google as an illegal cut-out for government censorship. The government may not enlist a "private third party" to do acts that it itself is forbidden by the Constitution from committing, but that is what Biden and the Democrat Senators and Congressmen do all day long, and National Review never says anything about it.

But if Cruz or Hawley talk about s.230 reform, or if Governor DeSantis cancels Disney's special tax arrangement based on Disney's announced intention to bring its corporate power to undo the will of the people, National Review screams that Republicans must never, ever use government power to influence the political speech or politically-charged decisionmaking of third party corporations, aka Muh Corporations.


Well, they absolutely refuse to address this glaring contradiction, no matter how many times they are attacked for it, so it is left for us to speculate, and I speculate as follows: Because Google knows that it has been pressured by Democrats, and has acceded to that pressure for years, and so does not want this topic to be discussed at all.

And because Google is paying off National Review, so National Review obeys Google's orders. Republican pressure on Google to merely remain politically neutral shall be protested as an unconstitutional and actually fascist intrusion of government into the affairs of a "private" corporation, but Democrat pressure on Google will be accepted, ignored, and justified.

If National Review wants to dispel such speculations, they can finally address this long-festering contradiction and its attendant stink of corruption. They can finally explain why it is, somehow, that constant political pressure by Democrat office-holders, who are simultaneously threatening to revoke Google's status as a tolerated (yet illegal) monopoly, to execute the censorship preferences of the Democrat Party are acceptable, but Josh Hawley's and Ted Cruz's (and others') attempts to stop the use of monopoly platforms for propaganda purposes is fascist and unconstitutional.

They could finally explain themselves.

But they won't.

They've had the opportunity to explain this filthy hypocrisy for years and years and haven't done so.

Because they can't.

Because all your suspicions are true, and there's no clean end to this turd.

(Thanks to DaveA. for that end line.)

digg this
posted by Ace at 04:24 PM

| Access Comments

Recent Comments
ShainS -- Boycott New York & other Blue Shithole Cities #TruckersForTrump[/b][/i][/s][/u]: "[i]The moon tonight is beautiful.[/i] it's the ..."

[/i][/b]andycanuck (2yu8s)[/s][/u]: "Scott Adams @ScottAdamsSays 3h My best guess is t ..."

Alberta Oil Peon: "According to some COB they use part of the colon. ..."

Braenyard: "161 Looks like it's coming down to bugs vs. humans ..."

Skip : "It Might Be Fake was taken on Antplexis 5, it's ab ..."

chris+opher: "Why are Instagram videos always shot with the came ..."

Braenyard: ">>>> And they aren't really making a vagina or a ..."

javems: "Looks like it's coming down to bugs vs. humans on ..."

Skip : "Good evening everyone ..."

BurtTC: ""I'm not sure but I think this might be fake." ..."

ShainS -- Boycott New York & other Blue Shithole Cities #TruckersForTrump[/b][/i][/s][/u]: "Now Big Mutilation is rolling in money-- the clini ..."

BurtTC: "Yosemite? Yosemite not. ..."

Recent Entries

Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64