Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!



Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups






















« New York Democrats Are Enjoying Contested Primaries And They're Not Enjoying Them Very Much | Main | Libs of TikTok... and Friends »
June 03, 2022

The Washington Post and Taylor Lorenz Lie to Smear (and Maybe Deplatform) Law YouTubers Who Got the Amber Heard Defamation Story Right

Screenshot (2285).png


Do you know what the "Adpocalypse" was?


There were two.

The Adpocalypses were brought down by the leftwing legacy media. They noticed that their own advertising revenues were sharply declining, while the advertising revenues being collected by independent, non-traditional media figures -- such as YouTubers -- was skyrocketing.

They decided to do something about that.

They decided to take out the competition.

The first Adpocalypse was an attempt by the Wall Street Journal to make advertising on non-approved legacy media outlets dangerous for corporations by smearing YouTubers like PewdeePie as racists. That resulted in YouTube imposing a censorship regime, and advertisers fleeing the platform.

The second one was when gay blogger Carlos Maza attempted to take down Steven Crowder, alleging that YouTube approved of homophobia. Again, more censorship, less ad revenue.

Now Taylor Lorenz and the Washington Post are attempting a third adpocalypse. They're attempting to take out rivals to the leftwing legacy media -- specifically, YouTubers who sided more with Johnny Depp during the Amber Heard defamation trial. The leftwing media, of course, had uncritically championed Amber Heard, as they'd championed all #MeToo allegations, #BelievingAllWomen without asking for any evidence.

In fact, the defamatory opinion piece Depp sued Heard for appeared in the Washington Post. They just added a stingy "Note" to their defamation.

So Lorenz is now attempting to paint it as dangerous for people to openly question #MeToo allegations on YouTube, and to suggest there's something wrong with non-legacy-media outlets making money off of a major media story. There's nothing wrong with the Washington Post making money off it, of course -- because they take the proper leftwing view of things.


But people like Rekieta or YellowFlash or That Umbrella Guy, the people who thought that Amber Heard was lying? Which, of course, a jury found to be the case?

They're dangerous and they shouldn't be allowed to make money off it. And damnit, YouTube has got to control who is allowed to make money from these news events!

By the way: The entire Depp/Heard story was already heavily censored by YouTube. Videos would be demonetized -- denied advertising -- if they discussed it all. Because of this, YouTubers were forced to resort to the childish tactic of referring to Depp as "The Pirate Guy" and Heard as "the Aqua Lady" to avoid censorship and demonetization. They had to avoid saying the names of the people they were talking about.

No, I'm serious.

But that's not enough for Taylor Lorenz and The Washington Post.

Either they have to declare "The Aqua Lady is telling the truth and The Pirate Guy is an abuser," or they must be deplatformed!

And Lorenz, in making the case that only she, a nobody, barely-educated semiliterate wannabe influencer who pretends to be a tweenager online and gets away with it because she is effectively developmentally delayed, should be allowed to weigh in on the Depp-Heard trial, and that actual trial lawyers like Rikieta and LegalBytes should not be so allowed, is on a scorched earth campaign to make them toxic to advertisers.

And of course she's also up to her old tricks of claiming she reached out to her subjects -- I mean, targets and victims -- for comment.

Spoiler alert: She did not reach out to her targets and victims for comment.

She did reach out to them after they publicly complained on twitter that she lied about reaching out to them for comment.

I guess she thinks that counts...?


She did the same thing to ThatUmbrellaGuy. See the link to Twitchy for that.

Update! And now the Washington Post has stealth-edited her lying "report" to omit the false claim that she had reached out to the YouTubers for comment.

The Washington Post article appeared to have been stealth-edited, removing the claim that Lorenz had reached out to the YouTubers for comment without an editor's note acknowledging the change.

Only after Fox contacted them about the stealth-edit were they embarrassed into offering a very muddled and (deliberately?) confusing "correction:"

After Fox News reached out for comment, the Washington Post issued a correction on Lorenz's report, reading, "A previous version of this story inaccurately attributed to [Depp representative] Adam Waldman a quote describing how he contacted some Internet influencers. That quote has been removed. The story has also been amended to note The Post's attempts to reach Alyte Mazeika and ThatUmbrellaGuy for comment. Previous versions omitted or inaccurately described these attempts."

Inaccurately described these attempts, as in, claiming they occurred at all was inaccurate?

What the hell?


How is she permitted to continue working at a major media outlet?

How is the Washington Post permitted to remain a media outlet?

Oh right, the Washington Post is a corrupt influence operation/defamation racket serving the leftwing cabal of the Ruling Class and only engages in propaganda and psyops. That's how she keeps her job.

And the Washington Post is pretended by the Ruling Class to be "Real News" because it serves their interests and defends their Right to Rule.


The leftwing legacy media is very, very determined that no one will be permitted to speak without their permission, without obeying their censorship rules, and that certainly no one will be allowed to make money in the speaking professions without following their required Code of Beliefs.

And they are ruthless and brazen about enforcing their will on this score.

digg this
posted by Ace at 03:58 PM

| Access Comments




Recent Comments
Ciampino - I assume TLJ is a Democrat: "That reminded me that Tommy Lee Jones was a room m ..."

JQ: "30-minute time shift? Ugh! That *would* be annoyin ..."

Carlyl: "It is a curse I tell you this internal time clock ..."

Skip : "G'Day everyone ..."

JQ: "Hi, Pixy! ..."

Ciampino - I slay myself: "558 No kidding! Next they'll be telling us, DARPA ..."

Skip : "It is a curse I tell you this internal time clock ..."

WEF, kinder and gentler super villians: "You will never have to vote, and you will LOVE IT! ..."

Ciampino - a bit gamey in taste: "I suppose Guinea fowls would be the African analog ..."

Carlyl: "JQ, I didn't mean that sarcastically. I am really ..."

JQ: "Carlyl, I'm so glad you approve. ..."

Carlyl: "JQ, I'm glad you voted. ..."

Recent Entries
Search


Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64