The Old Slogan of Black Racists -- "There Is No Such Thing as Anti-White Racism" -- Is Increasingly Foundational Government Policy

New York City just got busted distributing covid tests on a preferential basis according to race, with whites, of course, the race singled out for illegal, unconstitutional adverse discrimination.

And now New York State is rationing life-saving covid therapeutics according to race, and is now being sued for this plainly racist and unconstitutional scheme.

America First Legal (AFL) is suing the New York State Department of Health over a policy that instructs healthcare workers to prioritize COVID-19 treatments to non-whites and Hispanics.

"New York's use of a patient’s skin color and ethnicity as a basis for rationing medical treatment is racist and appalling. AFL will not stand by while any government attempts to establish a racial hierarchy in the provision of life-saving medicine, and we will continue to fight on behalf of all Americans who are being denied medical treatment based on immutable characteristics such as skin color," AFL said in a press release Monday.

Aaron Sibarium points out that this racial spoils system for covid treatment was proposed by... the federal government.

The FDA, specifically.

And it's not just going on in New York -- supposedly "red" Utah is doing it too. As are other states such as Minnesota.

IIn New York, racial minorities are automatically eligible for scarce COVID-19 therapeutics, regardless of age or underlying conditions. In Utah, "Latinx ethnicity" counts for more points than "congestive heart failure" in a patient's "COVID-19 risk score"--the state's framework for allocating monoclonal antibodies. And in Minnesota, health officials have devised their own "ethical framework" that prioritizes black 18-year-olds over white 64-year-olds--even though the latter are at much higher risk of severe disease.

Here's the scoring system used in Utah:

Under their racial spoils system, simply being Hispanic earns you more points -- makes your more eligible for monoclonal antibodies -- than having congestive heart failure, which is a serious comorbidity that would mark you as a very likely dying from covid should you contract it.

But if a young, healthy 19-year-old Lantinx athlete gets covid, he gets the monoclonal antibodies and the 64-year-old white guy with congestive heart failure doesn't -- because the government has decided that whites are an officially disfavored race and intend to act on that classification.

And I'm supposed to support this government, huh?

An extremely biased black radical "journalist" decides to completely lie for The Struggle and claim that a Florida law shields "white people" from "discomfort" in racial struggle sessions imposed by schools and corporations.

A bill pushed by Republican Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis that would prohibit public schools and private businesses from making white people feel "discomfort" when they teach students or train employees about discrimination in the nation’s past received its first approval Tuesday.

The Senate Education Committee approved the bill that takes aim at critical race theory -- though it doesn't mention it explicitly -- on party lines, with Republicans in favor and Democrats opposed

Wait I thought Critical Race Theory wasn't taught in schools. So how could this bill be "taking aim" at it in the schools?

Ever get the feeling the left is constantly lying to you and gaslighting you?

Of course it doesn't; it forbids schools and corporations from singling out any race and telling members of that race that they're inferior or responsible for the bad acts of other members of that race.

I wonder if this guy would support schools and companies making black men sit in forced reeducation sessions where they were forced to admit guilt for the greatly disproportionate amount of violent crime black men commit.

Of course he wouldn't. But there's no indignity too severe for the White Devils.

CRT is about Racial Vengeance, pure and simple -- replacing one despised and officially-disfavored race with another -- and they won't let the Constitution's guarantee that people will not be discriminated against on the basis of their race stand in the way. If the Constitution says that white people can't be made into an officially despised race, then the Constitution will have to be torn up.

How did this get past an editor? Did the race-hustling "journalist" just append a special "This article is Down with The Struggle" Post-It note to his lies knowing that his editor would then just let the lies go forward?

There is an unspoken but very, very powerful assumption in play here: many blacks and the entire woke left take it as foundational that there is no such thing as anti-white racism, and therefore you can behave as hatefully as you like towards whites -- and in fact should behave hatefully towards whites.

This is why they enact obviously discriminatorily and racially-hateful trainings and discriminations (and death sentences, in the case of withheld medical treatments) for whites.

But we're not allowed to talk about it -- in fact, even though many on the left will assert that "Anti-white racism is not a thing, all right?," on an official level, we're all supposed to pretend that this belief -- there is no possible anti-white racism because it is good and just to be racist against whites -- does not exist and has no purchase in the media, in corporations, in the universities, in public schools, or in government, when, in fact, it is
E V E R Y W H E R E.

But we can't talk about it, and because we can't talk about it, we can't pass laws against it and say, "Yes, yes there is such a thing as anti-white racism, and no, it is definitely not legal. Being #woke does not give you the right to be a vicious racist and get away with it, and use the government to push your racism on others."

When someone like DeSantis bans anti-white racism in companies and schools, you see black supremacists and the rest of the woke fascists -- who claim to be "anti-racists" -- absolutely shrieking, because they are definitely not "anti" racist at all.

They are definitely "pro" racist, very strong pro-racist. They are all in favor of state-enforced racism, against their racial enemies.

And what they call "racism" is now often the targets of their attempts to create an officially, state-manded target of racial hatred saying, "do not target us, that's not fair."

Which they say is "racist." Objecting to one's own racial victimization is "racist." Because it's "racist" to refuse to admit: White people deserve it.

If you deny it: that's racism right there.

By the way, I must insist: tHeRe Is No CrT tAuGhT iN pUbLiC sChoOlz.

A Fairfax County (Virginia) Public Schools curriculum has students play "privilege" bingo, giving them privilege points if they are white, male, employed or "involved in extra curricular [sic] activities," or "feel represented in the media."

It also says one has "privilege" if they are a "Military Kid," drawing shock from parents who pointed out that children of military members must move away from their friends constantly, not see one of their parents for months on end, potentially deal with post-traumatic stress disorder, and risk becoming orphans.

Parents who complained received a note from Assistant Superintendent Douglas A. Tyson that said:

The screen shot you reference comes from an approved FCPS English Curriculum lesson that is centered around students selecting a "choice" test and examining in detail the author's perspective on a wide-range [sic] of issues. Students are asked, in the lesson, to read critically and think critically about the author's perspective on several fronts including the author's privilege that may or may not be present in the work. Students are then asked independently and self reflectively to juxtapose their thoughts regarding any perceived privilege they think they may have and how they would potentially rewrite portions of the text. Students are not asked or required to report out their self-reflections. This lesson is an adept vehicle to push student thinking to challenge the author's thoughts/conclusions and to sharpen their ability to critically read selected texts.

There is no critical theory being taught, except for all the critical theory.

Are we ever going to actually debate the proposition that "It is now officially legal and proper to discriminate against white people (and white children) on the basis of their race," or are we just going to keep doing it while we officially pretend it's not going on?

Every single politician and government official should be demanded to answer this question -- including Republicans, many of whom would like to continue pretending that that this isn't going on, because they don't want to "make trouble" and be called a racist by objecting to it.

But it can no longer be ignored. The government is now imposing, via law, a racial caste system.

And this is called, incredibly enough: "Anti-racism!"

posted by Ace at 04:18 PM

| Access Comments