Sponsored Content




Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!



Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

NoVaMoMe 2024: 06/08/2024
Arlington, VA
Details to follow


Texas MoMe 2024: 10/18/2024-10/19/2024 Corsicana,TX
Contact Ben Had for info





















« Mid-Morning Art Thread | Main | Buzzfeed Holiday Party, With Masking and Vaxing Rules in Place, Is a #SuperSpreader Event »
December 17, 2021

The Morning Rant

talking ape.jpg

DISORDER IN THE COURT

While I was pondering the possibility of progressives aiming to corrupt 6th Amendment (although they've apparently decided to do the 'corrupt all of the elections' side-quest first), I got to thinking about how our judiciary has become the sole arbiter, or perhaps I should say ultimate arbiter, of all of our legal and even social issues, I thought, how did we get to this point? I don't think the men who wrote the constitution ever thought that the Supreme Court would be doing anything much beyond deciding mundane legal matters such as commerce disputes between one state and another.

But now every social issue somehow winds up before SCOTUS and we all are forced to live with whatever it is they decide.

The principle of judicial review was established by the Marbury v. Madison decision of 1803, wherein the question of who gets to determine whether or not a law is constitutional was answered "the Supreme Court" by the Supreme Court. Even though it was apparently not recognized at that time, that was when the United States no longer had a federal goverment consisting of three separate but equal branches, but rather one with two equal branches and one sitting on top of them both. And again, this is not something the founders ever had in mind.

The problem is that an explicit procedure for judicial review was not written into the constitution. I'm not sure why, perhaps the founder didn't think it needed one. Or it was something they just didn't get around to deciding because other issues were more pressing. For example, the issue of compulsory quartering of soldiers in private citizen' homes rankled them so much (since it wa a common enough injustice they had all witnessed) that they specially included an amendment (the 3rd) forbidding it. But nothing about judicial review. Seems odd to me, but that's probably because I'm almost three centuries removed, and nobody now living has any memory of it.

Anyway, if we think that the judiciary was never intended to be the preeminent branch of government, and that we, the people, should be the ultimate deciders concerning how we are to be governed, not an 'elite' group called judges, what can we do about it?

For one thing, I think we need to take jury duty seriously. The way most people (myself included) talk about it, it is something to be avoided, since it interferes with our daily lives. But since it provides direct opportunity to interact with the judicial branch, we should instead embrace jury duty, and try to be the best damn jurors we can. Also, jury nullifcation. I must confess I'm a little bit hesitant about this, because once we start using it, the woke mob will eventually catch on, and turn every jury trial into a tribal slap fight, but it may be worth doing nonetheless. Because I don't think the woke mob is as numerous as they're trying to get everyone (and themselves) to believe, even in blue states.

Also, it would help if we would stop electing corrupt, lying sleazebags to high office. Everybody complains about the low quality of our elected officials, but we keep electing them, so we're kind of punching ourselves in the face here.

But I have an idea.

As I said earlier, I believe the founders held that it is the people who should be ultimately decide how we are to be governed. So having 9 judges telling us "this is the law because we say it is, so shut up!" sounds antithetical to that principle. So I propose an constitutional amendment whereby the people and the states would be given the right to tell SCOTUS to take their ruling and stuff it. This is not something that would be easy to do. It would be similar to the constitutional amendment process. The act to nullify a SCOTUS decision would have to be ratified by some sort of supermajority of states by both the House and Senate, with maybe a special election in each state for the people to determine how the state would vote. Obviously, there would be many details to work out, but this would be our ultimate breakwall against the rising tide of judicial tyranny.

Now, will this fix everything? No, certainly not. There are a number of underlying issues still unresolved, not the least of which is we no longer agree what government is ultimately for. Our founders believed that government's main, if not only, job was to guarantee our liberties as free citizens. But I think many people believe that its job is to guarantee our safety. Which is kind of true, insofar as we're talking about crime and foreign invasion, but some have gone far beyond this and want protection from the vicissitudes of life. This is why the Covid Karens like to shout "Your freedom is not more important than my safety" at us. They expect something no government is able to give them. It is a fundamentally irreconcilable difference in worldviews.




meme 20211217 00.jpg




It Didn't Go Over Well The First Time The Dems Tried It:

meme 20211217 01.jpg



How It Started:

meme 20211217 02.jpg



How It's Going:

meme 20211217 03.jpg



Karen McKaren Is Unhappy With Us:

meme 20211217 04.jpg




meme 20211217 05.jpg




meme 20211217 06.jpg




meme 20211217 07.jpg



Based:

meme 20211217 08.jpg



WEF Guy #1: "Sir, they're not eating bugs like we want them to. What do we do?"
WEF Guy #2: "Shout louder and insult them. That always works":

meme 20211217 09.jpg



Late, But Very Strong, Entry For 'Dumbest Tweet Of 2021':

meme 20211217 10.jpg



Tater Gets Fact Checked:

meme 20211217 11.jpg



Harsh, But Fair:

meme 20211217 12.jpg



Who Dis:

who dis 20211217a1.jpg

Photo 2 (elbows!)
Photo 3
Photo 4
Photo 5
Photo 6
Photo 7



For the 'Ettes:

who dis 20211217b1.jpg

Photo 2
Photo 3
Photo 4
Photo 5



Wednesday Who Dis: Actress/singer Zooey Deschanel stars with Jake Johnson in the Fox comedy New Girl.



Today's Edition Of The Morning Rant Is Brought To You By Texas Birthday Cake:

texas birthday cake 01.jpg



Bonus Miracle:

digg this
posted by OregonMuse at 11:17 AM

| Access Comments




Recent Comments
18-1: "Old saws no longer valid: Is the Pope Catholic? ..."

rhennigantx: "Putting it all together, we now know - as the Phil ..."

dantesed: "- - - - The AP After Reporting His Death Without V ..."

Thomas Bender: "@189 >> Trans grandma able to breastfeed baby w ..."

Cat Ass Trophy : "Joseph of Arimethia! ..."

Sponge - F*ck Joe Biden: "[i]Louis Gossett Jr is still alive but he has anno ..."

Lizzy[/i]: ">>[i]Okay, I'm going to give a Trump W this mornin ..."

Captain Obvious, Laird o' the Sea, Radioactive Knight: "He went off to Kathmandu. Posted by: Count de Mon ..."

Humphreyrobot: "Twinkle nuts. That's the bad fairy. ..."

Warai-otoko : "I'd laugh if the majority of crooked shit being do ..."

Count de Monet: "They catch P.Diddy yet? More coffee... Posted ..."

Sponge - F*ck Joe Biden: "[i]Well the Dark Money infusion - oh, I meant the ..."

Recent Entries
Search


Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64