Quick Hits

Thanks to Dworkin Barimen.

Creepy Joe Biden pervs on another child.

NBC "News'" "Big Think" vertical -- the same vertical that published so much from communications director for the the pedophilia-mainstreaming group, the Protasia Foundation, Noah Berlatsky -- doubles down on the Democrats' winning message in Virginia: Parents have no say in how stupid woke 24 year old girls decide to indoctrinate their children.

Schools face parents who want to ban critical race theory -- and don't get how teaching works

An educator's top goal is to teach students to think. Parents who dictate curricula with their personal opinions, ideologies and biases hinder that goal.

Parents have always tried to interfere with curricula, as I observed when teaching middle school in the mid-2000s.

You know what it takes to teach 8th grade?

It takes a ninth grade education.

That's not a joke; that's the real requirement. The teaching profession requires an Education degree not because that degree is difficult or useful but because it limits the number of teachers and therefore elevates the salaries they can demand.

It's a guild maintenance grift. It's a guild/union-imposed requirement solely for purposes of limiting entrants into the field. Allowing any educated person with competence in the field to be taught would drive down their salaries from artificially inflated to something more like what the market would offer based on actual skill level.

Because literally any educated person can do this.

This is why teachers get angry at programs like NYC's initiative to bring in people without education degrees to teach in city schools. They know these people can do the jobs -- but they don't want the fake value of their fake credentials diminished.

She thinks her education degree makes her a Scientist.

No really, she does. Let her Sciencesplain this to you.

Even then there was no shortage of parental input about the content of my instruction, from books to test questions. Part of the problem is that parents think they have the right to control teaching and learning because their children are the ones being educated. But it actually (gasp!) doesn't work that way. It's sort of like entering a surgical unit thinking you can interfere with an operation simply because the patient is your child.

Teaching, too, is a science. Unless they're licensed and certified, parents aren't qualified to make decisions about curricula. In fact, parental interference can actually hinder student advancement. An educator's primary goal is to teach students to think. Parents who attempt to influence curricula with their personal opinions, ideologies and biases hinder that goal.

Christopher Rufo looked up this Scientist's background, and found she is... about what you'd expect her to be. Someone who, in his words, has elevated her mental illness into a political ideology.

By the way, this is another admission that they are teaching CRT in schools.

The media publishes an op-ed one day saying CRT isn't being taught, next day, publishes one saying that it would be terrible to not teach CRT. They never demand that educrats, teachers, or Democrats resolve these contradictory claims.

Because they're partisan liars and have no relationship with the truth any longer.

Does forcing kids to sit through a Drag Show with sexual twerking, and to participate in it, count as CRT? Or are we calling this Science?

That drag-queen story. Wow.

This podcast is timely, from New Discourses, on sexual grooming in gov't schools: https://tinyurl.com/54me5zfs
Posted by: lizabth

I'll be listening to that on my hike tomorrow.

John Kennedy called Biden's communist, literally Soviet-trained thief and nominee for Comptroller of the Currency "comrade" in her hearing and the Washington Post had a conniption: Why, this is... Red-Baiting!

Red-baiting, shrieked the same newspaper which... red-baited the previous (and current lawfully elected) president for five years running:

Note that that's not just the same newspaper -- it's the same hack propagandist.

I guess it's cool to suck up to the Soviet Union again, huh? We're all done pretending we're rootin'-tootin' sixgun-shootin' commie-huntin' American Avengers, now, huh?

Seems like old times.

The mid-wits who stupidly believe themselves smart are killing us. Absolutely murdering us:

All the mid-wits do is repeat what they see other mid-wits repeating on Twitter (which in turn comes from still other mid-wits). Read, repeat, retweet. Read, repeat, retweet. Read, repeat, retweet.

And they think they're Top Intellectuals in the field of Twitter Science for regurgitating claims they've never investigated nor, truthfully, ever given a moment of serious thought about.

This is National Review's entire business model -- they give succor to idiots.

Well, not idiots. Mid-wits.

Knock knock. Who's there? Houston Health Department. Are you vaccinated?

Walgreens stores in San Francisco finally close for good over "rampant theft." Elections have consequences.

In this town, there were some outlaws bound to teachings of the Red
Many soy boys were among them, as were trannies overfed
They were vicious, prone to violence, burning gas stations and more
And their leader rode a skateboard rolling swiftly on the floor
Swiftly on the floor

It was over in a moment as the folks gathered around
The skater sought the rifle as the youth lay on the ground
Oh, he might've went on livin', but forgot one major thing
And he fell down, shot dead by the kid with an AR on a sling
AR on a sling

They are who we thought they were:

This is what they choose to post today.

Counter-programming, I guess. Making it clear that they seek a new market.

And their new market is: David French.

And only David French.

Well, vaya con diabolo, assholes.

posted by Ace at 05:36 PM

| Access Comments