Ace: aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck: buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD: cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix: mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum: petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton: sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022 Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022 OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published.
Contact OrangeEnt for info: maildrop62 at proton dot me
Smoking Gun Video from Sky News Australia Shows Live Bats Being Kept at the Wuhan Lab, Despite Peter Daszak's Repeated Claims That Any Suggestion of Live Bats at Wuhan Was a "Conspiracy Theory"
Video proof that the Wuhan Institute of Virology was keeping live bats for experimentation on their campus.
Peter Daszak -- who sent money from Fauci to the Wuhan lab -- has repeatedly denied that any bats were kept at Wuhan, claiming that this is a "conspiracy theory."
Now he allows that he "wouldn't be surprised" if they were trying to set up a "bat colony" in the lab.
Hmm -- from "conspiracy theory" to something that wouldn't surprise him.
And this new stance comes just after the DRASTIC group of covid researches releases video of bats at the lab:
The video also notes that the Wuhan lab kept 15,000 samples of bat viruses. Remember, the Chinese deleted this entire database of bat viruses they possessed, because, they claim, of the threat from "hackers."
Peter Daszak "investigated" the lab and called this claim "reasonable." He then admitted he didn't even ask the Chinese to see the deleted database.
The same reporter interviews one of the scientists who made the case for the lab leak "theory" in the WSJ a couple of weeks ago.
He restates the fact that no other coronaviruses have the "CGG CGG" genetic coding for argenine. (As his WSJ article noted, while no naturally occurring coronaviruses have this CGG CGG genetic fingerprint, it is extremely common in lab-created ones.
He mentions a few other facts that point to a lab creation of the virus:
The covid-19 virus has a "furin cleavage site" which is not seen in any other similar coronaviruses.
The "official story" that this came from a known bat virus that somehow got a pangolin's DNA mixed in it does not hold up, as the bat virus this is supposedly a mutation of has 1,100 different DNA base-pairs than covid-19. Each genetic change takes a period of time, and so covid-19 and the bat virus the China Apologists claim covid came from are quite dissimilar and that dissimilarity could only come about through an improbably long period of mutation.
He also notes that "of course" the presence of live bats being experimented on at Wuhan also adds to the case for lab creation.