Time Magazine: You're G**damn Right We Ordered the Code Red on Rigging the Election.
And We Should Get Medals for It.

Will Time be deplatformed for admitting this?

Nah.

But will we be deplatformed for noting Time admitted the left rigged the election?

Probably.

Leftwing "journalist" -- really, a Democrat operative with a press pass -- Molly Ball brags about how she and her friends rigged an election to ensure the "proper outcome," as one of her buddies says.

"It was all very, very strange," Trump said on Dec. 2. "Within days after the election, we witnessed an orchestrated effort to anoint the winner, even while many key states were still being counted."

In a way, Trump was right.

There was a conspiracy unfolding behind the scenes, one that both curtailed the protests and coordinated the resistance from CEOs. Both surprises were the result of an informal alliance between left-wing activists and business titans. The pact was formalized in a terse, little-noticed joint statement of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and AFL-CIO published on Election Day. Both sides would come to see it as a sort of implicit bargain–inspired by the summer's massive, sometimes destructive racial-justice protests–in which the forces of labor came together with the forces of capital to keep the peace and oppose Trump's assault on democracy.

The Establishment of the GOP takes all of its cues -- and a lot of money, coincidentally -- from the Chamber of Commerce. The Chamber of Commerce wants absolute corporate sovereignty with zero accountability, and the GOPe takes their paychecks and gives them their political payoffs.

The handshake between business and labor was just one component of a vast, cross-partisan campaign to protect the election--an extraordinary shadow effort dedicated not to winning the vote but to ensuring it would be free and fair, credible and uncorrupted.

Here's what they did before the election, according to Time:

For more than a year, a loosely organized coalition of operatives scrambled to shore up America’s institutions as they came under simultaneous attack from a remorseless pandemic and an autocratically inclined President. Though much of this activity took place on the left, it was separate from the Biden campaign and crossed ideological lines, with crucial contributions by nonpartisan and conservative actors. The scenario the shadow campaigners were desperate to stop was not a Trump victory. It was an election so calamitous that no result could be discerned at all, a failure of the central act of democratic self-governance that has been a hallmark of America since its founding.

Lie.

Their work touched every aspect of the election. They got states to change voting systems and laws and helped secure hundreds of millions in public and private funding. They fended off voter-suppression lawsuits, recruited armies of poll workers and got millions of people to vote by mail for the first time. They successfully pressured social media companies to take a harder line against disinformation and used data-driven strategies to fight viral smears.

Like censoring the Hunter Biden story.

They executed national public-awareness campaigns that helped Americans understand how the vote count would unfold over days or weeks, preventing Trump’s conspiracy theories and false claims of victory from getting more traction.

No, this "public awareness campaign" was designed to prep the public for the key Democrat cities to go dark for five hours and then suddenly discover tens of thousands of Biden votes. They prepped the public to believe this was normal and legal -- and invevitable.

After Election Day, they monitored every pressure point to ensure that Trump could not overturn the result.

They mean: They made sure Trump could not bring their election-rigging to wide public attention.

For Trump and his allies were running their own campaign to spoil the election. The President spent months insisting that mail ballots were a Democratic plot and the election would be "rigged."

You literally just crowed about how smart the left was (along with its corporate allies on the pseudoright) to rig the election.

His henchmen at the state level sought to block their use, while his lawyers brought dozens of spurious suits to make it more difficult to vote–an intensification of the GOP’s legacy of suppressive tactics.

By "suppressive tactics," you mean checking signatures, which the left turned off for this election. They mean illegally accepting ballots without a signature. They mean illegally accepting ballots without a postmark, and illegally accepting ballots with a postmark past the legal deadline.

Any effort to screen out illegal votes is, to the left, "suppressive tactics."

...

This is the inside story of the conspiracy to save the 2020 election...

That's why the participants want the secret history of the 2020 election told, even though it sounds like a paranoid fever dream--a well-funded cabal of powerful people, ranging across industries and ideologies, working together behind the scenes to influence perceptions, change rules and laws, steer media coverage and control the flow of information. They were not rigging the election; they were fortifying it.

"Fortifying it" in every case by changing the rules, almost always illegally, to permit fake ballots.

This is the part of the war where they have shot most of the survivors, and are now engaging in psyops to humiliate and degrade whoever is still alive. They are now admitting they rigged the election so that we understand that there is nothing we can do about it -- we are a defeated people, they want us to know, and they intended to rule us.

A friend remarks:

Had you or I pieced together the Time piece from open source data, we'd be attacked by NRO and Examiner, etc as conspiracy theorists

True. They're in on it too. All of these people take money from the Chamber of Commerce, AEI, Google, etc.

They're all working together to block half of America from ever having a political voice.

OUT: The election wasn't rigged

IN: The election was rigged, but in a good, smart, upper-middle-class Wine Aunt way

Any questions?

Is anybody except the saddest cvck masturbating in his closet still under the delusion that this is a democracy?

The Washington Examiner's nearly-illiterate managing editor says there's no rigging here, just fortifying an election for the Democrats:

Directly related: The Supreme Court decides to hear the Pennsylvania election-law-changing case-- a month after the candidate they favor has been sworn in.

@cmpimental

BREAKING: The United States Supreme Court has scheduled the Pennsylvania election case, Sidney Powell's Michigan election case, and Lin Wood's Georgia election case for its February 19 conference

posted by Ace at 01:02 PM

| Access Comments