Trump Calls for Peace, But the "Conservative" Thought Leaders Call For War -- On Actual Conservatives

Some genuine blood-up angry here from "men" who could barely rouse themselves to criticize antifa and BLM.

They hate your guts and want you dead.

Oh, and they tricked many of us into providing a grifter's living to them for decades.

Here's Trump, telling the protesters to go home and go in peace:

The guy who walked with Marxist radical black supremacist group Black Lives Matter now discovers a protest movement he can condemn.

By happenstance, it just so happens to be a conservative-aligned protest movement!

@jmartNYT . @MittRomney summoned me as lawmakers and press arrived at a secure location

"This is what the president has caused today, this insurrection," he said w fury in his voice.

WisRich says that earlier, Romney yelled at his fellow Senators: "THIS IS WHAT YOU'VE DONE!"

Meanwhile, Erick Erickson tries a new tact to get CNN to rehire him: extreme, unhinged twitter anger.

"Waive the rules" -- waive the Constitution, this obese he-bitch means, so that his political enemies can be illegally harmed.

Oh, and "shoot the protesters."

Remember when this envenomed emotional spastic threatened to shoot and kill a mere census taker for knocking on his door?

Note that this alleged "Christian" seminary student routinely calls for extreme violence against whatever has piqued his impotent fury this minute.

And then, a month later, he writes an op-ed in which he confesses that sometimes he strays from the path of Jesus, and scolds other people for not remaining true to the path like he does.

Jesus is just another grift for this vile fucking monster.

Update: Here is graphic video of the female protester being shot in the back for climbing through a window.

So, Erickson got what he wanted.

I suppose he's working on his next "You must repent, for I have sinned" column.

Meanwhile, other Donor-Class Darlings are attacking Trump for not offering a full-throated-enough condemnation of Mostly Peaceful Protests.

Quick question, though: You know the candidate you in fact supported, but were too cowardly to forthrightly admit you supported? You know, the "moderate" Joe Biden?

Can you tell me when he condemned the violent anarchists of antifa?

Oh he refused to, right? He was demanded by Trump to denounce antifa, and refused, and said antifa was "just an idea" and therefore should not/could not be denounced?

And of course you took him to task for that, right?

Oh you didn't?

You know, for years, those of us on the Real Right have had one fundamental, dealbreaker demand: We shall not have two sets of rules, one for the left and one -- a much more punishing and vindictive one -- for the right.

And throughout all these years, the grifter pseudoright has backed up their leftwing allies' in their insistence that no, the left should have a more lenient and permissive set of rules, and should be permitted the occasional year-long spasm of psychopathic violence.

We should defer to the Moral Authority of the psychopathic left.

So yeah, the pseudoright agrees with the left on the minor issue of whether conservatives actually are full citizens in the US -- they agree with the left that we're second-class citizens as best. We're a kind of unconvicted-criminal class who are born into a lesser caste marked by limitations and special obligations.

But you know, they agree with us on the really fundamental "conservative" issues like whether their donor Google should be protected forever from an antitrust/monopoly practices lawsuit. And other big issues like whether or not their corporate donors should get another big tax break.

So, at least we have agreement on that.

So we're all one big happy Party, right?

We're one United States of America, huh?

posted by Ace at 04:55 PM

| Access Comments