Ace: aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck: buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD: cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix: mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum: petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton: sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022 Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022 OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published.
Contact OrangeEnt for info: maildrop62 at proton dot me
CDC Official Charged With Determining Who Will Get Vaccine First (Deliberately?) Ignored Enormously-Heightened Risks of Covid to Those Aged 70 and Older So They (They is a Binary) Could Recommend Giving the Vaccines to Younger Minorities
Killing grandma -- for real.
They're pushing a regime of murderous eugenics, but they're stamping it as "Science."
The epidemiologist who modeled vaccine distribution for the CDC is a gender nonbinary, defund-the-police activist "living on occupied land." A hardcore SJW. Twitter account went private today. https://t.co/grlUxvpjlD
2/n Jo is a scientist, but rather than use the reported vaccine efficacy (90-100%), Jo’s model used an estimate of 70%. Jo's model also doesn't take into account the highly age-stratified risk of COVID published by the CDC. https://t.co/nXl58u1vPf
4/n The NYT explained why this was fair, and now many states are implementing vaccination plans based on Jo’s model—resulting in hardly anyone over 70 being vaccinated. https://t.co/fvIUEzAZ8Dpic.twitter.com/TnV9avCnli
7/n Jo is a perfect example of following The ScienceTM. Jo probably already got their vaccine & is feeling very virtuous. Not only would Jo be helping to “stop the spread,” Jo is ensuring that a more deserving (if lower risk) trans-person gets it rather than some old white person
9/n a follower pointed out Jo’s model is based on only 35% efficacy over 65. The trial data (small n) shows 100%. With such high efficacy in the at-risk pop, it is lunacy (murder?) not to start there.https://t.co/rDC7tegCeZpic.twitter.com/dQPHhKEgs4