Huge: British Spies Tried to Warn The US and Trump About Christopher Steele's Shaky Credibility; Were Those Warnings "Lost" in the Mail?

Via Deb Heine at PJMedia, this seismic report from John Solomon.

One of the deepest, darkest secrets of Russiagate soon may be unmasked. Even President Trump may be surprised.

Multiple witnesses have told Congress that, a week before Trump's inauguration in January 2017, Britain's top national security official sent a private communique to the incoming administration, addressing his country's participation in the counterintelligence probe into the now-debunked Trump-Russia election collusion.

Most significantly, then-British national security adviser Sir Mark Lyall Grant claimed in the memo, hand-delivered to incoming U.S. national security adviser Mike Flynn's team, that the British government lacked confidence in the credibility of former MI6 spy Christopher Steele's Russia collusion evidence, according to congressional investigators who interviewed witnesses familiar with the memo.

But for some reason this warning was buried. Michael Flynn, for example -- the intended recipient of the warning -- says he never received it.

A source familiar with Flynn's account, however, told me the former Trump national security adviser has no recollection of receiving the British communique or what might have happened to it, meaning that President Trump likely was not told about it.

Did one of the NeverTrumpers on the transition team disappear it?

&bodytext=Via Deb Heine at PJMedia, this seismic report from John Solomon. One of the deepest, darkest secrets of Russiagate soon may be unmasked. Even President Trump may be surprised. Multiple witnesses have told Congress that, a week before Trump's inauguration...&topic=world_news"> posted by Ace of Spades at 02:00 PM

| Access Comments