University of Toronto's Mandatory "Genderless" Bathroom Policy Results In, Get This, Dudes Peeping on Girls In the Showers

Who could have known then men enjoy looking at the unclothed female form, or that there's a particular kink of men looking at naked women surreptitiously?

This obscure syndrome was examined in a little-known documentary called Porky's. Also, there is a 100,000 year history of men looking at images of naked women, even if they're just scrawled on cave walls or whittled out of an auroch's hip-bone.

But for the Social Justice Warriors, there are no facts, only screamed dogmas dripping with spit.

The future is here, and it is dumb.

The University is temporarily changing its policy on gender-neutral bathrooms after two separate incidents of "voyeurism" were reported on campus September 15 and 19. Male students within the University’s Whitney Hall student residence were caught holding their cellphones over female students’ shower stalls and filming them as they showered.

Melinda Scott, dean of students at the University of Toronto, told The Daily Wire that campus police had been contacted immediately and worked with residence staff to "support impacted students and ensure the safety of the Residences."

"Given the serious nature of these incidents and the impact on directly affected students, we made the decision to specifically designate some washrooms in Whitney Hall for those who identify as men and those who identify as women," Scott said.

The university, however, is not changing their policy. They're only changing some bathrooms back to "gendered" in the affected hall, and furthermore, this is just a temporary measure (sticking a band-aid on a bleeding wound). They want to get back to their bizarre "Gender is Just a Word" ideology as soon as possible.

For 0.03% of the population, "Gender is Just a Word." For the other 99.97%, it's a fact and a deeply felt daily life experience.

But by all means -- let's sacrifice the #Safety and comfort of everyone so that people who have a different sense of gender are never confronted with the fact that their sense of gender is indeed different than most's.

Update: I had forgotten about this recent story -- a sexual predator claiming to be a "transwoman" used his easy access to the women's bathrooms to rape two actual women there.

A sexual predator who falsely claimed to be transgender and preyed on women at two Toronto shelters was jailed indefinitely on Wednesday.

Justice John McMahon declared Christopher Hambrook -- who claimed to be a transgender woman named Jessica -- was a dangerous offender.

Why are they saying he "falsely" claimed to be transgender? Isn't gender just what you say it is today? How can any claim of gender be objectively claimed as "false," as it's all entirely subjective now and a mere matter of whimsical self-definition?

The fact that he raped women proves nothing. You can be a "transwoman" and still be sexually attracted to women. That's why there's several entries in the new rules of gender identity -- cisgender means you identify as your biological gender, transgender, the opposite of your biological gender. But then added on top of that is your actual sexual orientation -- which could be for either gender, your born gender, or your adopted one, or both, or neither.

If he says he's a "woman," he's a woman. Period. Isn't that the stupid rule we're being clubbed over the head with here and told we're "haters" if we dispute it?

Thanks to Lauren for that.

posted by Ace at 11:36 AM

| Access Comments