Sanders Now Leads Hillary in Iowa, Too

Actually, while he leads her by one point, that is statistically insignificant, and one should say more properly they're statistically tied.

But who are we kidding? He's beating her ass.

As you know, he's already beating her ass in New Hampshire by nine points.

You know why? Come on, are we really going to elect someone with that face? That face? Seriously, look at her face.

No but seriously (wait, I actually was serious -- that face), I saw someone note this idea:

The media really has to begin covering Sanders as the front-runner at some point, right?

Yes, Hillary leads nationally; but... not in the first two states to vote.

Wondering... Seems a bit hypocritical of me to roast Trump for the Fiorina insult and then post the Hillary picture.

I'm mulling it over right now whether I was wrong.

I don't know if I was wrong, because, to be honest, I don't really care about Trump's antics except to the extent they make him a political Loser; that is, my evaluation is less about whether his remarks are objectively intolerable (a debate I'm not interested in, as it ultimately is personal and idiosyncratic and heavily influenced by extraneous outside factors like "do I support him or oppose him") but whether not they're politically intolerable -- if people decide a bit of chivalry for the fairer sex is an important virtue to have, they're going to feel dirty voting for a guy who plainly doesn't share that view.

Still, I am aware of the hypocrisy factor here, and I am thinking about it.

Palette Cleanser: An oldie but a goodie.

posted by Ace at 01:39 PM

| Access Comments