« Netroots Nation Is So, So Much More Fun Than the Trump Comments, But the Media Only Has Eyes for Republican Squabbles |
Main
|
Overnight Open Thread (18 Jul 2015) »
July 18, 2015
Sure Why Not
So this is being sold as the natural, inevitable endpoint of progressive feminism: Cuckolding for male feminists.
You do you, I guess, and Paolo will do your wife.
What's with the interracial element in all this cuckolding stuff? This writer is obviously using pseudonyms; I assume he's white, because no other race's men would be so full of small-ball self-loathing as to actively desire sexual humiliation.
So he could have called the paramour Peter or Paul; but no, it has to be Paolo, because he needs you to know that a man of a different race is all up inside his wife, and he's cool with that -- in fact, he's excited by it.
Why?
I have my theories.
The opposite of White Supremacy should not be that white males are so full of self-loathing they actively desire their wives to be screwed by men of other races, so that they can experience what sex with a real man is like.
I do not favor White Supremacy, nor White Pride, but I gotta tell you, the pendulum swing towards White Self-Loathing is abhorrent.
Then again, as a man who's both comfortable with my sexuality and my race, I guess it's possible I can have sex with these quavering jelly-men's pseudowives.
So, I guess, fine by me. Let's change it to You Do You, and I'll do your wife, you sub-beta puddle of nothing at all.
More: She Reasoned Him Into It. Not sure he really was convinced by this, or he already wanted his wife to see what sex with a Real Man was like, and this was merely the pretext he accepted to have his fantasies come true:
She didn't present it as an issue of feminism to me, but after much soul-searching about why the idea of my wife having sex with other men bothered me I came to a few conclusions: Monogamy meant I controlled her sexual expression, and, not to get all women's-studies major about it, patriarchal oppression essentially boils down to a man's fear that a woman with sexual agency is a woman he can't control.
I wish I had one-tenth the argumentative skills of this... um, sexually-adventurous woman.