Sponsored Content




Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!



Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

NoVaMoMe 2024: 06/08/2024
Arlington, VA
Details to follow


Texas MoMe 2024: 10/18/2024-10/19/2024 Corsicana,TX
Contact Ben Had for info





















« Walker Leads the Field, Survey Finds | Main | AoSHQ Podcast: Guest, Sean Davis »
February 13, 2015

Rand Paul Says Something Not Terribly Objectionable About the Environment

I'll just post this quick to make a Strong Form/Weak Form comparison.

The Strong Form of AGW-skepticism is that human activity does not influence the climate.

The Weak Form AGW skepticism is that human activity may influence the climate, but the extent to which it does so has never been established by reliable science, making this a plausible speculation, not an established fact.

The Weak Form may then pay some lip service to anti-pollution efforts and add something like, "All things being equal, it's probably a good idea to try to limit the quantity of pollutants we're producing."

I remember in 2008 Tim Pawlenty was basically disqualified from consideration as a candidate because he offered up some soft soap lip service to the possibility that CO2 is a greenhouse gas (it actually is, by the way), and as governor he approved spending some money to study environmental impacts, which is, when you think about it, the very smallest amount of money or effort one could possibly spend on this thing, but which also immunizes you (to a small-dollar extent) from charges that you "Hate the environment."

Rand Paul is not my candidate, and I am definitely an AGW denier (not a skeptic, a full-on denier), but there's really nothing terribly wrong with minor statements like this and if we keep being ridiculous about always insisting on the very strongest Strong Form restatement of our principles, we shouldn't wonder when only 20% of the country is prepared to agree with us about them.

Let me point something out: People insist on the strongest of Strong Form restatements because they want to know, without wondering, that Candidate X will be with them on a particular issue, 100%, no doubt about it.

That's understandable, but do bear in mind when one insists on that level of 100% iron-clad I Am With You Come Hell Or High Water guarantee, one is absolutely forbidding them from making any play whatsoever who might have more "concerns" about the issue.

A 100% airtight guarantee to one voter is a 0% pitch to another.

It should also be noted that these demands for perfect no-wiggle-room assurances descend into falsehood for ideological purposes: For example, again, it is not seriously contested by anyone that CO2 is indeed a (weak) greenhouse gas, and that some unknown quantity of excess CO2 in the atmosphere would have some kind of impact on the climate.

Further, it is likely that the current level of excess CO2 pumped into the air by man-made activities has already impacted the climate, to a small (unknown) degree, and of course not necessarily for "the bad," as Climate Sillies insist.

But to demand people say things that are not true, like that CO2 isn't a greenhouse gas, and that there is no greenhouse effect at all (look at Venus), or that no quantity of CO2 could possibly disturb the climate, is just dumb.

We don't need Rand Paul to swear on a pack of Bibles to things which everyone knows are false just to establish his ideological bona fides.

Falsehoods should never be part of one's ideology, nevermind a central, litmus-test part.


digg this
posted by Ace at 02:00 PM

| Access Comments




Recent Comments
18-1: "Old saws no longer valid: Is the Pope Catholic? ..."

rhennigantx: "Putting it all together, we now know - as the Phil ..."

dantesed: "- - - - The AP After Reporting His Death Without V ..."

Thomas Bender: "@189 >> Trans grandma able to breastfeed baby w ..."

Cat Ass Trophy : "Joseph of Arimethia! ..."

Sponge - F*ck Joe Biden: "[i]Louis Gossett Jr is still alive but he has anno ..."

Lizzy[/i]: ">>[i]Okay, I'm going to give a Trump W this mornin ..."

Captain Obvious, Laird o' the Sea, Radioactive Knight: "He went off to Kathmandu. Posted by: Count de Mon ..."

Humphreyrobot: "Twinkle nuts. That's the bad fairy. ..."

Warai-otoko : "I'd laugh if the majority of crooked shit being do ..."

Count de Monet: "They catch P.Diddy yet? More coffee... Posted ..."

Sponge - F*ck Joe Biden: "[i]Well the Dark Money infusion - oh, I meant the ..."

Recent Entries
Search


Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64