Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!



Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups






















« From the Files of Police Squad: No CCWs Allowed? | Main | America Shocked to Learn Professional Athletes Gin Themselves Up Into War Fever and Then Trash-Talk Opponents »
January 20, 2014

Beware Conservatives Floating Big Government Healthcare Plans

Avik Roy is considered one of the right's leading healthcare policy experts. Unfortunately, his current plan isn't exactly conservative.

His latest idea does away with Medicaid & Medicare as we know it. A laudable goal to be sure but there are a few catches.

To credibly advance this approach, conservatives must make one change to their stance: They have to agree that universal coverage is a morally worthy goal.

Color me cynical but if your "conservative" plan relies on first redefining conservative principles to make what you want to do fit the definition of conservative, it's not actually...conservative.

So what approach is Roy advancing?

First, we’d deregulate the Obamacare exchanges and modify the law’s subsidies to broaden Americans’ coverage choices and encourage adoption of health savings accounts and catastrophic coverage.

Second, we’d raise Medicare’s retirement age by three to four months per year forever. Since people below the Medicare retirement age would be in the means-tested exchanges, this would gradually replace the fully subsidized Medicare program. For example, over 15 years the retirement age would be roughly 70, meaning that individuals aged 65 to 69 would get their health insurance through the exchanges.

Third, we’d transform the Medicaid program by folding its acute-care population into the deregulated exchanges, while returning its long-term care and disabled populations fully back to the states, free of federal interference.

Let's unpack that a bit.

First, we're keeping and reforming the ObamaCare exchanges, not doing away with them.

Given that conservatives have campaigned on repealing Obamacare for nearly four years, it’s jarring to consider a reform plan that does not formally scrap the law. But such a plan has several advantages.

Say it with me...we all hate ObamaCare equally. Even those of us who want to keep parts of it or implement it at the state level.

Second, his plan basically requires the privatization of Medicare and Medicaid. Is there anyone who has half a clue about American politics who thinks that's anything but a fantasy?


What will happen is big government conservatives will have forced the right to concede the liberal goal of "universal coverage" as a worthy and legitimate government endeavor. They will then do what they always do...cobble together some gigantic program that keeps the worst elements of all the plans which then doesn't do exactly or even remotely do what it's most ardent supporters claimed it would. That will naturally lead to calls to “fix” the unforeseen problems with more government intervention in the market place.

What Roy suggests, catastrophic plans paired with Health Savings Accounts (HSAs), is a good plan. It was an option available before ObamaCare came along. But there's no reason to make it universal. Aside from the fact that some people may chose other options because it's simply their right to do so, you can have a system like this as an option by...simply repealing ObamaCare and returning to where we were in the dark days of 2009.

Would it be nice to turn Medicare and Medicaid into this type of program? Sure. But aside from it being a political fantasy that has some glaring holes (like how exactly are Medicaid patients going to fund their HSAs?), there's no reason to force the rest of the country into this model.


Roy will say including everyone in this type of system is the only way to control the overall cost of healthcare in this country. Again, this ignores some major historical realities. When the government tries to control the overall cost of a product/good while at the same time acting as the major provider of funding for that product/good, two things will happen.

1. If the government says "here's a pile of money" people will find ways to spend that money. Think of the college loan system and the higher education bubble. Once almost everyone could afford college thanks to government subsidies, grants and loans (whether they were suited to going or not), colleges found ways to spend all that "free" money.

The healthcare industry will do that too.

2. Once costs do start rising because of all this money flowing the only option (other than “spend even more!”) will be to directly control prices and/or limit access. This is just the fact of how government works when it interferes in the marketplace.

Yes, Roy points to similar plans in Switzerland and Singapore but those tiny, homogeneous countries have nothing in common with a diverse, continental nation like the United States.

Of course Roy is right that the big drivers of government healthcare spending are Medicaid and Medicare. But the way to control those costs is not adding another huge entitlement to coverage. Find ways to reform those programs and minimize the government’s role in the private healthcare/insurance sector.

Big government conservatives like Roy are the flip side to die hard lefties...they ignore history and insist that their big government idea will work because none of the ones that came before were done the right way.

We've been trying big government ideas and promises like universal coverage for close to a century. How about we try something completely different for a while? Like letting people make and live with their own choices. It's so crazy it just might work.

digg this
posted by DrewM. at 12:13 PM

| Access Comments




Recent Comments
CrotchetyOldJarhead : "Found greasy spoon burger place out on the west si ..."

Accomack: "Royal Farms slices the potatoes into long chunks, ..."

whig: "And you keep that great greasy taste. Posted by: ..."

Carlyl: "You can go back to a time when French fries were ..."

JQ: "Five Guys has terrible fries,.... The worst fri ..."

Ciampino - No but it'll tell you how much oxalate: "179 "What's wrong with him?" "He ate the rhubarb ..."

Angzarr the Cromulent: "And the best ketchup is from Whataburger. ..."

Quarter Twenty : "Transfer the ketchup to a generic squeeze bottle t ..."

Warai-otoko : "I've never had a ketchup go to the bitter end befo ..."

That annoying mouse you haven't been able to catch: "281 The worst fries on the planet...nay, the unive ..."

Mr Gaga: "I hate self checkout, but did it ten minutes ago. ..."

Angzarr the Cromulent: "The worst fries on the planet...nay, the universe. ..."

Recent Entries
Search


Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64