Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!



Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups





















« Albania, Then And Now | Main | AoSHQ Podcast: Guests, Mark and Mollie Hemingway »
November 15, 2013

Obama's "Fix" Totally Illegal, But You Knew That

There is a wrinkle you might not have thought of, though.

First, Jonathan Adler notes that Obama is not purporting to change the law. He can't. Or, he daren't. What he's doing is saying he won't enforce the law -- the law still says that the old policies are illegal. Obama's just saying he'll give insurers a pass, and won't enforce the law against them.

Presumably, he also won't enforce the law against citizens buying these Illegal Policies, either.

But here's the wrinkle-- why on earth would an insurance company conduct an illegal action just because a lawless President swears it's okay? Adler thinks it through:

Yet even if state commissioners approve the plans, they will still be illegal under federal law. Given this fact, why would any insurance company agree to renew such a plan? It’s nice that regulators may forbear enforcing the relevant regulatory requirements, but this is not the only source of potential legal jeopardy. So, for instance, what happens when there’s a legal dispute under one of these policies? Say, for instance, an insurance company denies payment for something that is not covered under the policy but that would have been covered under the PPACA and the insured sues? Would an insurance company really want to have to defend this decision in court? After all, this would place the insurance company in the position of seeking judicial enforcement of an illegal insurance policy.

As has been noted by many, Obama's best-case scenario here is he pretends insurance companies are free to offer the old policies, but, because they don't wish to break the law, they refuse to do so. Then Obama is in a win-win position: He can claim this isn't due to his own actions (I gave insurers the Secret Wink to break the law!) and yet keeps as many people as possible in the expensive, hidden-subsidy exchanges, to subsidize the sick and keep Obamacare afloat.

This is worthless, a pure political piece-of-shit deception. Obama is, get this, lying again.

The only way to even have a chance to get these policies offered is if they're officially legal, like legal legal, not illegal, but I'll ignore it for now "legal."


digg this
posted by Ace at 04:42 PM

| Access Comments




Recent Comments
Paco: "[i]Very good. I added it to other X tweets I have ..."

Altaria Pilgram: "New Olympic Event Candidates: Revenge Porn Che ..."

Don Black: "They throw spears and hammers at the Limpix law ..."

torabora : "Wasn't the Pentathlon patterned after French (Napo ..."

LizLem: "Pickleball. Then the older athletes can still comp ..."

olddog in mo: "I thought lawn darts were banned. Might put an ey ..."

Ben Had: "andycanuck, thank you for being our intrepid rep ..."

runner: "I think they should bring back live pigeon shootin ..."

fd: "Ketchup doesn't have to be tomato based. ..."

Mike Royko: "196 Worshipping Ba'al > ketchup on a hot dog Post ..."

"Perfessor" Squirrel: "It was Marvin the Martian's birthday Wednesday, he ..."

thatcrazyjerseyguy now with twice the crazy: "He probably did the 100 meter dash enough running ..."

Recent Entries
Search


Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64