Sponsored Content

Intermarkets' Privacy Policy

Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!

Recent Entries
Absent Friends
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

This Right Here Is Some Really Stupid Isht | Main | "But do you not see?" An Extended Excerpt from the Book Mentioned by "Required Reading," Christian Nation
August 19, 2013

Open Thread, and Also, Chris Christie Signs Bill Forbidding Mental Health Professionals From Performing Gay-to-Straight "Conversion" Services on Kids 18 or Under

As Allah says, he won't be winning Iowa.

I have mixed feelings here. I'm pretty sure that such "conversions" are just malarkey and probably do some harm on the net.

And yet, People Have the Right to Be Wrong, don't they? Yes they do. As many have observed, free expression is not your right to be right -- if everyone agrees you're right, you hardly need the protection of a Constitution to express yourself.

Free expression is, in final analysis, about the right to be wrong, and about a government which is restrained from compelling people to Think The Right Way.

This combines with a parent's general right to care for his child and instruct him as he sees fit... and not how the State sees fit.

I happen to agree with the underlying sentiment here -- sexuality is too rooted and complex a thing to be changed by psychological therapy. I doubt very much that straights could be made gay by such therapy.

But neither do I like the State taking decisions out of the hands of parents. Technically the law forbids mental health practitioners from providing such services, but this scotches the left's long-held claim that the bond between a patient and a caregiver (as in the case of abortive services) is sacred and must not be put asunder by the petty laws of mankind.

And who knows, perhaps such laws will be found unconstitutional.

Here's my basic drop-dead takeaway: People are going to do all sorts of things that are mistaken, wrong, harmful, and dangerous.

But there is no real freedom if the state is constantly step in to restrain us from being mistaken, wrong, harmful to ourselves, or even dangerous.

Yes, there is a list of things we all know must be made illegal for civilization to exist at all.

We go looking to add to this list at our peril. And we've been doing very little but adding to this list for the past fifty years.

Guns, Big Gulps, salt, racism (real and imagined), homophobia... apparently we're going to have to destroy the village of Liberty in order to save it.

One day everything bad will be illegal and everything good will be mandatory.

And won't that be a pretty utopia then?

Let's be grown up about this: Freedom does have its downside. And that downside is mistakes and even deaths.

But here's the upside: An unfree life is not worth living. A dog on a chain may be well cared for, but it is just a pet.

Two Good Questions: dicenta asks about the case of a kid who was sexually molested by a same-sex perpetrator and is now sort of "wired" to be gay simply because that was his first sexual experience (and early sexual experiences are potent, of course, particularly for young children).

Any exception there, or does the law now just say "Ah, he's gay now, suck it up"?

That would feel a little like the ban on abortions in the case of rape-- the state's now going to step in to make sure the victimization fully takes and goes all the way to term.

Y-Not also asks if this will apply to priests, say, if parents bring their kids to a priest for counseling. The surface answer seems "no" -- I think the law applies to "mental health professionals" -- but courts may construe this provision, ahem, liberally, and say that anyone providing such services becomes a mental health professional under the terms of the law.

But I don't know. The law might specifically exclude the clergy.

Including, But Not Limited to: CharlieBrownsDildo links the relevant definition of mental health professional:

"A person who is licensed to provide professional counseling under Title 45 of the Revised Statutes, including, but not limited to, a psychiatrist, licensed practicing psychologist, certified social worker, licensed clinical social worker, licensed social worker, licensed marriage and family therapist, certified psychoanalyst, or a person who performs counseling as part of the person's professional training for any of these professions, shall not engage in sexual orientation change efforts with a person under 18 years of age."

But that list is inclusive not exclusive. It does not include the clergy, but neither does it exclude them.

digg this
posted by Ace at 05:04 PM

| Access Comments

Recent Comments
browndog Official Mascot of Team Gizzard: "Way to go Fen... Truly, you are doing God's wor ..."

Braenyard: ">>> If the dopes in the GOPe elect another clown, ..."

Diogenes: "That's why he is not speaker. If the dopes in t ..."

18-1: "[i]Look for more Uke girls wanting to marry Americ ..."

kbdabear: "Al Pacino Approved ONT Compliance Pics https:/ ..."

San Franpsycho: "Good evening morons and thanks mh Photo caption ..."

COMountainMarie : "Real job got in the way today. And here I thoug ..."

Mail Order Brides by Miklos (se habla Ukrainsksi): " Look for more Uke girls wanting to marry American ..."

Child Protective Services: "Have to share...today at lunch my kid chopped up c ..."

Isolden: "399 To me, conservatism isn't "based on the preser ..."

TecumsehTea: "Alberta Oi ahh ..."

Way, Way Downriver [/i]: "Willowed for Current Events: [i]I found out ..."

Recent Entries

Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64