Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support
« Thursday Morning News Dump | Main | Eric Holder Announces The Department Of Justice Will Sue Texas Under The Voting Rights Act »
July 25, 2013

House Rejects Amendment To Scale Back NSA Cell Phone Data Collection Program

Representative Justin Amash’s (R-MI) amendment that would have reformed and limited the NSA’s collection of data from nearly every cell call in the country was defeated in a vote that crossed party lines.

A $512.5 billion Pentagon appropriations bill cleared the House Wednesday evening after the leadership narrowly beat back efforts to curb the National Security Agency’s authority to collect private call records and metadata on telephone customers in the U.S.

The pivotal 217-205 vote was the first real test of political sentiment since former National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden leaked documents that revealed the secret program.

“Have 12 years gone by and our memories faded so badly that we forgot what happened on September 11,” asked House Intelligence Committee Chairman Mike Rogers (R-Mich.). But former House Judiciary Committee Chairman James Sensenbrenner (R-Wis.), answered as bluntly: “The time has come to stop and the way we do [that] is to approve this amendment.”

The “But September 11th!” defense for intrusive surveillance is always going to be with us. It’s a ridiculous “argument” because it isn’t one. Either the programs that are in place stand on their merits or they don’t. No one seems to be bothering to actually make the case. You’ll hear “but it’s stopped a bunch of attacks!” Which ones? How? Why didn't it stop the Boston bombing when we had advanced warning that the older brother was connected to terrorists?

Personally, “trust us” isn’t good enough. Promises that almost all of the data collected is never analyzed aren't good enough either. Distrusting the government isn’t a sign of nuttery (unless taken to an extreme of course) but rather a healthy necessity in a republic.

Former NSA and CIA director Michael Hayden comes close to making a case but he underplays the value of the data and just how intrusive it is.
Most disturbing is the reality that collecting data on EVERY call violates the terms of the PATRIOT Act no matter what the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court says (presumably that’s their ruling but amazingly there are secret court rulings and case law we don’t know about).

Security state advocates like Andy McCarthy are reduced to arguing for a ridiculously wide reading of the PATRIOT Act section authorizing that is plainly at odds with the statute.

In fact the only check McCarthy seems to recognize on the power of the state to collect 3rd party records is the good will of the executive branch.

The problem here is not government power. It is the government officials we’ve elected to wield it.

Yes, that’s exactly what the founders were worried about when they wrote the Constitution in order to limit the power any person or government agent could wield. Checking ALL power centers, ones we like and ones we don’t like, is a feature not a short coming of the American system.

How off the rails is McCarty? He thinks a proper reading of the 4th Amendment would make it legal for the government to listen and record your actual phone conversations without a warrant.

The Constitution was not deemed to be violated absent some form of government trespass. That is why, under the Fourth Amendment as originally understood, it would be a violation for police, without a valid judicial warrant, to attach a GPS tracker to a person’s car and monitor his movements (the situation in the Jones case). On the other hand, it would not be a violation to wiretap a person’s conversations by physically attaching a monitoring device to the phone company’s line on a public street, without any entry into the person’s home or trespass on his property.

(Emphasis mine)

In the age of ObamaCare coupled with Supreme Court decisions from a supposedly “conservative” court that allows massive intrusions into market place and personal freedom and an out of control politicized IRS, I’m not comfortable in trusting the good will of any President or bureaucracy. Government wants information and power. Sometimes it will be used wisely but not always. That’s why a healthy skepticism of claims of vague and open ended needs must be maintained. Again, distrusting the government is a feature, not a bug of our republican form of government.

I think it was good to have the debate on the Amash Amendment (though it got far too little attention). Even in failure it will set the stage for a more serious look at either reforming or replacing Section 215 of the Patriot Act as it currently interpreted.

We gave the government an inch and of course they took a mile. It’s time to take it back.


digg this
posted by DrewM. at 09:34 AM

| Access Comments




Recent Comments
The Nightwatch: "I'm going to Foo Fighter tracks now kiss the s ..."

beanervt: " "Minnesota still burning?"  The summer ..."

Wolfus Aurelius [/i] [/b]: "I may be able to go out to eat tonight. The websi ..."

The Nightwatch: "1501 Would you be offended.....if I just bailed ..."

lizabth: "They doxxed Chauvin's wife. Put all her info out o ..."

Skip : "MLii not seeing anything on new mayhem in Minneapo ..."

lizabth: "John Roberts votes with the leftists again. Sheesh ..."

AltonJackson: " g'mornin', 'rons ..."

The Nightwatch: "ding ..."

Gooshy: " And more Morning Crew straggles in. Sup, peep ..."

The Nightwatch: "Ace has not banned me yet ..."

freaked: "Chauvin's wife has filed for divorce. She sounds l ..."

Recent Entries
Search


Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64