Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!



Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups






















« Deal Reached on Filibusters to Avoid Nuclear Option | Main | Familiarize Yourself With The Marissa Alexander Case Before The Media Misinforms You »
July 16, 2013

USA Today Media Writer: Media Is To Blame For Simplistic, Hero/Villain Narrative of Zimmerman Affair

Well of course, and while I agree with much of this essay, the writer eventually loses the plot, and probably deliberately.

Here's the stuff that's obviously true:

The story of their tragic confrontation on February 26, 2012, in Sanford, Florida, was framed early on. Zimmerman, then 28, was the neighborhood watch captain/"wannabe cop" who racially profiled and ultimately killed Trayvon, an unarmed, hoodie-clad black teenager out on the streets of the gated community Retreat at Twin Lakes simply because he wanted some Skittles.

The storyline quickly took root, amplified by the nearly ubiquitous images of the two: a sweet-looking photo of a several-years-younger Trayvon released by his family, and a mug shot of Zimmerman from a previous arrest in which he looks puffy and downcast. The contrasting images powerfully reinforced the images of the menacing bully and the innocent victim.

He goes on to list the media sins of NBC (deceptively editing the call to police), ABC (claiming videotape showed no injuries to Zimmerman, and later having to admit that in fact video did show injuries), and everyone who tried to fit the half-Peruvian Zimmerman into the neat simple black/white duality by inventing a new category of racial description, the infamous "White Hispanic."

The writer says that's like calling Obama a "white black."

But then he does that thing that every single media critic does when he comes to the issue of media bias: He essentially dismisses it.

Conservatives see this episode as yet another manifestation of the pervasive bias of that dreaded liberal media. But there's something else at play. Journalists are addicted above all else to the good story. And the saga of the bigoted, frustrated would-be law enforcement officer gunning down the helpless child was too good to check. It's also another example of how groupthink can shape news coverage.

They always do this. Whenever the media gets something wrong -- and they get a lot of things wrong -- they offer up various reasons for having gotten it wrong but none of those reasons are ever "persistent, ubiquitous, and blatant bias to the leftist worldview and pro-Democratic partisan sympathies."

It's always the same things, according to the media: We got sloppy. We're not perfect. Sometimes a story is "just too good to resist," whether it's true or not.

But let's look at this "too good a story to resist." The writer successfully diagnoses the Zimmerman coverage as the media attempting to simplify a complicated story, in which the facts are simultaneously messy and unknowable, into a childishly unsophisticated White Hat/Black Hat Narrative.

Fine. But why does the media always choose the same predictable Designated Heroes for its simplistic Narrative, and the same Designated Villains?

This guy says this particular storyline was "too good to resist." But why that storyline? What about another storyline -- that a man was accused of murder by an overreaching, corrupt DA who was playing politics to the anger of the mob?

That's a pretty good storyline too. It has a Hero and a Villain. It's simple.

And yet, of course, you'd never see that "too good to resist" story in the media.

Yes, the media is stupid, sloppy, lazy, incapable of showing the necessary skepticism about storylines, and monstrously herd-like in its group think. All of these things are true.

But the media's errors always fall against one side of the political divide, and always in favor of one side of it. And that is not just due to stupidity, incompetence, laziness, and all the rest.

An unbiased incompetent would get a lot of things wrong, but he'd get things wrong randomly as regards political benefit to either side of the divide.

The media does not get things wrong in a random way. They always get it wrong the exact same way.

And that's because they're not merely liberals -- which is not a knock in and of itself -- but because they are relentless, blatant, shameless partisans for the liberal cause.

And the six bazillion "the media got it wrong but not because it's liberal" claims aren't going to change that fact.


digg this
posted by Ace at 12:53 PM

| Access Comments




Recent Comments
Hadrian the Seventh: " *cracks knuckles loudly* Good evening, Hordia ..."

Oldcat: "Hasn't it been shown that in various "studies" fie ..."

Deplorable Jay Guevara[/i][/s][/b]: "The humanities produce nothing of value. It's all ..."

Miklos remembers: "Wait until they get a load of these whoppers they ..."

I used to have a different nic: "Slap a stranger's child link no workee. ..."

runner: "Tucker's preview specifically mentioned how he tri ..."

NaCly Dog: "Red Bull. Not me. ..."

Mr Aspirin Factory, red heifer owner: "Who was that congresscritter, CA IIRC, that looked ..."

CharlieBrown'sDildo: "He's either been red-pilled or he's desperately tr ..."

Tonypete: "What's difficult is a black person with a cockney ..."

NaCly Dog: "The freedom video is using music from The Snowman. ..."

vmom deport deport deport: "Nood dragon flies ..."

Recent Entries
Search


Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64