Sponsored Content




Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!



Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Bandersnatch
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups





















« "I'm Not Here as a Serf or a Vassal:" House Panel Interviews Conservative Groups' Leaders Targeted by IRS | Main | Jim McDermott: Let's Face It, You Deserved to Get Targeted by the IRS »
June 04, 2013

Do Human Beings Only Matter To the Extent They Serve as Cogs in a Government Plan?

Jonah Goldberg writes about one of his obsessions.


Longtime readers of mine will recall that one of my bugaboos is the liberal obsession with the “moral equivalent of war.” Ever since William James coined the phrase, liberalism has essentially become a cargo cult to the idea. The core idea, expressed in myriad different ways, is that normal democratic capitalism is insufficient. Society needs an organizing principle that causes the citizenry to drop their individual pursuits, petty ambitions, and disorganized lifestyles and unite around common purposes.

Naturally, the State must provide leadership and coordination in this effort, just as it does in a war. That was the essential rationale behind the New Deal – war mobilization without war.

Barack Obama has spent much of his presidency all but begging the American people to imbue themselves with a moral equivalent of war spirit. Sometimes he’s used the phrase explicitly, other times he’s dreamed that America could act like the military. Other times he’s droned on about the need for unity and dedicating ourselves to a “cause larger than ourselves” – that cause invariably being the government. He’s talked a lot about “Sputnik moments” and the need for Americans to rally around his green agenda the way we rallied around the space program.

I loathe all of this. The whole point of a free society is that people will do what their hearts and consciences tell them to do, individually and in voluntary association. We have a military to keep us free, not to provide examples of how best to surrender our freedom. Moreover, the exhortation to give our selves over to the spirit of wartime mobilization when there is no war is frightening because, unlike real wars, not only is “victory” not defined, it cannot be defined. We will never have a kingdom of heaven on earth, so any call to mobilize the people to fight for one necessarily means permanent mobilization, which means the permanent surrender of what this country was founded to establish.

One failing I find in conservative rhetoric, as far as its appeal to the citizenry, is that it often seems "too political." Certainly the media and the left (but I repeat myself) constantly cast us that way, that we're just "rightwingers" who have no other interests but our rightwing ideas. That we can then be dismissed as cranks, because all we do is gnaw on our various fringe political chew-toys.

But this is projection, isn't it?

I really like Goldberg's formulation here. Not just because it is 100% true -- many things are 100% true, and yet aren't particularly grabby as political rhetoric.

But I think this one is 100% true and grabby, as it reveals the truth about who it is, exactly, who's obsessed with government -- who it is who is determined to tell us that our lives have no meaning outside of our service in the corporate entity called the US Government --and who it is who says there is far more meaning outside of a Government-Ordered Life, and just wants to be left alone to find our own meanings.

I think 30% of people, those LIVs, are only interested in politics to the extent politics connects with their own aspirations and vanities. I think Goldberg's formulation could be very useful in appealing to the LIVs.

I know it's very appealing to me, personally. And not even in a political way, necessarily.

Is the deepest drive of humanity to be part of a government program? Is our highest aspiration to join a government-organized social club?

I don't think so. Not only do I not think so, I think it's insane to believe such a thing. And pointing out the insanities of the left is the way to beat them, because LIVs really don't care about policy; they care about which party makes themselves think well of themselves by associating with it.

Associating with a group that believes lunatic things does not permit someone to think well of himself for associating with it. Quite the opposite.


digg this
posted by Ace at 11:15 AM

| Access Comments




Recent Comments
Joe Mannix (Not a cop!): "[i]Disney is offering the Modified Limited Hangout ..."

TheJamesMadison, raging against the bourgeois with Pasolini: "And oh wow, Pedro Pascal. How'd you get him? He's ..."

TheJamesMadison, raging against the bourgeois with Pasolini: "Disney is offering the Modified Limited Hangout th ..."

Kratwurst: "Lamont is back! ..."

Truck Monkey Report: "I haven't been sick a day since I got over The Chi ..."

Montec : "I went up on my roof to blow the leaves off this f ..."

Formerly Virginian: "Burn mouse burn ..."

TheJamesMadison, raging against the bourgeois with Pasolini: "last ..."

Wolfus Aurelius, Dreaming of Elsewhere [/i] [/b] : "Miss Linda swears she had the Coof again last week ..."

wth: "! ..."

I am the Shadout Mapes, the Housekeeper: "[i]287 285 If there is one thing to respect about ..."

But that's just me : "I'm not reading it as fast as I can. ..."

Recent Entries
Search


Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64