Intermarkets' Privacy Policy

Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!

Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

« Week Three Pick'em Results [Ben] | Main | NYT Reviews Obama Foreign Policy; Doesn't Find Many Successes »
September 25, 2012

Michelle Obama's Restricted-Calories Lunch Menu Sparks Outcry

Apparently we've solved all serious problems. We can now turn our focus to the lesser problems, like fat kids.

And, because we don't want to make fat kids feel fat, we'll put everyone on a restricted-calorie diet.

Our Professional Deciders have decided that the dietary requirements of an athlete or morning farm-worker are exactly the same as a sedentary overweight kid who needs fewer calories.

Some Kansas students and at least one political leader say new school lunch guidelines aimed at limiting calories and encouraging good nutrition are having an unintended consequence:

Hungry kids.

But that's not an unintended consequence. It's an intended one. A fair percentage of kids are overweight and need to diet (though restricted-calorie diets aren't the way to go). But the government, being of a One Size Fits All mindset, mandates the restricted-calorie diet for people who plainly do not need to diet (active students, athletes) and wonders why so many are complaining.

Even as far as addressing the overweight kids -- the intended consequence is hunger. Why do they imagine restricted-calorie diets are so unpopular?

It's the hunger, stupid.


The new guidelines — the first major overhaul of school meals in 15 years — also require cafeterias to serve less fat and sodium and more fruits, vegetables and whole grains.


The lunch included one cheese-stuffed bread stick, a small dollop of marinara sauce, three apple slices and some raw spinach. Kirkham supplemented the lunch with items from a salad bar, including cubes of ham, bacon bits and dressing, which were available only to teachers.

“I asked why the sauce had no meat and I was informed that due to the breadsticks containing cheese, the meat would put us over the guidelines for protein,” Kirkham wrote.

“Now think of a high school boy who works out at least three hours a day, not including farm work. … I’m furious. The ‘cheese’ inside the breadstick is approximately three bites. This is ridiculous.”

This being McClatchy, though, they go on to talk up how many people like being hungry. If I could offer my own spin -- it gives students a sense of focus (on survival functions).

The USDA now recommends packing "healthy snacks" for kids. So what is the point here? They enact a restricted-calorie diet for all students, 75% of whom don't need it, and then suggest that parents send along more calories if they think their kids need it?

Then what is the point of denying hungry kids an extra portion? The system is set up for full compliance (no exceptions!) in order to make sure the fat kids aren't cheating. But this One Size Fits All approach doesn't work for everyone, so they tell people "Eat more if you need to."

So, if there's an element of students (and their parents) making individually-tailored diet decisions here, why impose the blanket calorie-restricted diet on everyone?

There's an easy way out of this, of course. They could just permit extra portions to any athletes or anyone whose parents sign a form stating they work in the morning and need extra calories.

This is obvious, of course. But they don't do it because One Size Fits All. It's a religious mantra. Can't treat different students differently, you know. Even when the students have different circumstances and different caloric needs.

If they're confessing their restricted-calorie state-imposed universal menu isn't universal -- if they're confessing that there is a strong element of personal/parental responsibility for diet decisions here -- then... why are they doing this?

A viral video, apparently written by a teacher and performed by a 16 year old football athlete, is parodying the program:

Political take: My own observation is this-- people get especially animated about things at the center of the human experience. Chiefly I mean sex, God, and food/eating habits.

Michelle Obama is playing with fire.

digg this
posted by Ace at 11:42 AM

| Access Comments

Recent Comments
The Button Down Mind: "Bob Newhart is, was, and forevermore shall be, the ..."

80's music fan: "Tell us you have never met a democrat without tell ..."

LinusVanPelt : "Joe Biden: Is it live or is it memorex?? ..."

BruceWayne: "I love ya kid. Things Joe has never said to Kamala ..."

TheJamesMadison, riding the anarchy train with John Landis: "454 Boy the "chaotic" "out of control" Democrat pa ..."

no one of any consequence: "Last time I checked, and it was about 40 years ago ..."

...: "Over under on when we see the first Che style Kama ..."

Minnfidel: "I love ya kid. Things Joe has never said to Kamala ..."

runner: "BREAKING 🚨 The Whitehouse Gets Caught Usin ..."

SMOD: "First Lady Paris-Bound for Olympics to Lead Americ ..."

Warai-otoko : "Endorse is one of those words that loses its meani ..."

...: "Boy the "chaotic" "out of control" Democrat party ..."

Recent Entries

Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64