I Saw It On The Internet

The scary thing is that we don't even know how many victims the Searchlight Strangler may have in his past.

It could be any number. That's the horrifying thing: We just don't know. It could be ten. It could be more. It could even be less.

And if it's less, wouldn't that imply he took his time with his victims?

Meanwhile, a credible source, vetted by the Alabama State Bar, wonders why Harry Reid "inflitrated" the Boy Scouts, and for what purpose.

Funny: I was pretty hilarious last night on Twitter, changing my account to a memorial to Harry Reid's victims.

It's all pretty funny, but it's funnier in order, if you get the evolution of it, first from "interesting question" to pure demagoguery to jumped-up tabloid all-caps screaming headlines.

You want to go way back down, 19 hours ago, starting at around the point where I say to Drew, "These allegations have swirled too long. It's about time someone got to the heart of the Harry Reid Pederasty Issue." Then read up.

But here were the best bits of it. Before I went full tabloid, and was still just in demagogic insinuations mode.

Invisible Tears

An account in memory of Harry Reid's victims, both unknown and known.

The American public is entitled to know whether its Majority Leader is, or is not, or likely is, a pederast.

If Harry Reid isn't a pederast, why is everyone saying he is? People don't just make up vicious smears for political advantage.

Even if there's only a one in three chance Harry Reid is a pederast, are we really going to let that one child suffer?

If Harry Reid isn't a pederast, how come no DC liberals ever ask him to babysit?

The issue here isn't whether Harry Reid is, or isn't, or is a pederast. The question is only "What are we going to do about it?"

I'm not saying Harry Reid is a pederast. That's for the courts to say.

I'm saying there are children located in what I call "The Danger Zone" around Harry Reid. Do we gamble their innocence so lightly?

I have no proof that Harry Reid is guilty of pederasty, but can we at least keep kids out of the Harry Reid Molestation Perimeter?

You can't convict him in the press; obviously, this is America. But can we at least require him to wear a big hat that says LIKELY PEDERAST?

Harry Reid's defenders say, "You can't convict a man of pederasty based only on him being a pederast." I find their position untenable.

I think the important question is not, as some ask, "Is Harry Reid a pedophile?" The important question is "Why do DC Democrats enable him?"

hey media, can we at least make sure Harry Reid's victims are alive before ignoring them?

Harry Reid owes a full accounting on behalf of all he's killed.

We need to begin petitioning a statue commemorating the victims of Harry Reid, including all the unknown ones.

We need a Tomb of the Unknown Harry Reid Sex-Murder Victim. Can we do any less?

Why does Harry Reid not support the Victims of Harry Reid Memorial?

If Harry Reid has nothing to hide, why hasn't he contacted authorities? Why hasn't he pointed out where he buried his victims bodies?

If Harry Reid didn't kill those boys he victimized, then how come they're not around to testify against him? Think about it.

I can't say if these charges are true. Only the evidence and his countless victims can say that.

Let me just ask one legitimate question, containing no unfair implications whatsoever: Why does Harry Reid own gardening tools?

Why does he own trashbags? Why does he have a car with a trunk? These are reasonable questions that he must answer.

Does Harry Reid, or does he not, own any rope, twine, or extension cords easily used as ligatures and bonds?

Harry Reid says he's a big fan of baseball and car racing. Like a lot of young boys are. I guess that's just "another coincidence," huh?

And here's where I dubbed him with his Serial Killer name:

Why does Harry Reid, the Searchlight Maniac, own duct tape?

I call this picture "The Warning Signs."

Oh: I forgot about this, by @johnekdahl.

posted by Ace at 04:45 PM

| Access Comments