Sponsored Content

Intermarkets' Privacy Policy

Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!

Recent Entries
Absent Friends
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

Study: Too Much Light & Too Much Internet At Night Can Lead To Depression, Obesity, Other Adverse Health Effects | Main | Captain Kickass: Check Me Out Talkin' To Foreign Leaders With A Baseball Bat In Hand
August 01, 2012

Headline: Obama Authorizes Secret Support For Syrian Rebels

Just ponder that headline for a moment. Take it in.

I support the policy, by the way. (But more on that later.)

I just wonder if the Obama's National Security folks are using the same dictionary that I am, or if the page with the word "secrecy" on it is missing.

Remember when SEAL Team Six didn't exist? Or back when details of SEAL tactics were not supposed to be known by the world at large? Or back when it was a secret that the FLAME computer virus used the neat-o tactic of sending its data to nearby Bluetooth-equipped phones and laptops, to get the information transmitted from the secure (not connected to the internet) networks?

Yes, that was "secrecy" before Barack Obama needed a reelection boost, back when "secrecy" meant "we don't leak this information to our partisan agents in the media."

And now: Obama secretly orders secret help for our secret friends in the Syrian rebellion. It's in all the papers, like good secrets should be.

President Barack Obama has signed a secret order authorizing U.S. support for rebels seeking to depose Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and his government, U.S. sources familiar with the matter said.

Obama's order, approved earlier this year and known as an intelligence "finding," broadly permits the CIA and other U.S. agencies to provide support that could help the rebels oust Assad.


The White House is for now apparently stopping short of giving the rebels lethal weapons, even as some U.S. allies do just that.

Rolling eyes. Either it's true and it's sooo typically Obama, or it's not true -- and this then is him "keeping a secret," even though it's preposterous that Syria wouldn't suspect we were sending arms.

As for why I support this: For one thing, so long as we're supplying armaments and not US armed forces, I don't consider it "war" so I don't think we need Congressional approval, necessarily. Reagan didn't seem he needed it for this sort of thing, asserting it fell under the Foreign Policy Power of the Executive in the US.

Further, Syria is a major bad actor, Iran's best friend. (Well... apart from Mother Russia.) If the Syran rebels succeed, not only will they rid the world of an anti-American despot, and not only will Iran's influence and reach be diminished, but the Syrians will likely spill many of the secrets of the old terrorist-supporting, Iran-allying regime to foreign governments, such as our own.

Further, the Arab/Muslim world is in desperate need of reform. I don't know how that will happen, or when it would happen; but I think we should generally favor attempts at freedom. Evicting a tyrant is not sufficient for a people to claim their human dignity and become friends of liberty (see Egypt), but it is almost certainly necessary for such a transformation to take place. Even if that transformation takes 40 or 60 years.

If Syria frees itself, it might also have the indirect but benevolent effect of freeing Lebanon as well (currently under rule by Hezballah, thanks largely to Syria's and Iran's determined promotion of that terrorist group).

I think the War on Jihadism is like the Cold War. Meaning: It is going to go on for so long that we will have to make judicious use of proxy wars and limited commitments. Looking back, I think Iraq and Afghanistan were mistakes in the way they were fought; we fought them at a very high tempo, with a lot of US troops, and lots of US treasure. (Meaning: If we take on Iran, which we must, it will first an airwar to decapitate the state and destroy the army, and then a speedy invasion with the sole purpose of capturing its nuclear materials and equipment (and "accidentally" shooting its nuclear scientists when they flee) and then evacuating the country. The public will not support an occupation or a "rebuilding," and I think it best to just accept that and plan accordingly. They will have to work things out for themselves. If you have only two enemy regimes that need subduing, a lengthy and costly and bloody rebuilding might make sense; if you realize that maybe you'll have ten such engagements in the coming decades, then such large commitments seem impossible.)

But that sort of very-high-tempo warfare is only sustainable for a six or eight years. If Jihadism could be knocked out relatively quickly -- like the Japanese Empire or Nazi Reich could -- it would make sense to use WWII style total commitment high-tempo warfare against it.

But I don't think it can be, which suggests to me we must employ strategies that can be sustained for a long period of time. Which means things like sending arms and intelligence to the enemy of our enemies.

My thinking on this is that Reagan Was Right on foreign policy, and the so-called foreign policy "neoconservatives" (of which I was one) were far too optimistic and idealistic about things. I think Gingrich said things like this: "I'm a hawk, but I'm a cheap hawk."

I think Bush's policy was simply too costly to serve as a model going forward.

digg this
posted by Ace at 07:43 PM

| Access Comments

Recent Comments
Grumpy and Recalcitrant: "Gardening Thread NOOD ..."

Grumpy and Recalcitrant: "Good, I could use some beauty from nature to gaze ..."

FenelonSpoke: "Posted by: LinusVanPelt at September 30, 2023 01:0 ..."

LinusVanPelt : "As a protestant who leans toward the evangelical s ..."

Tom Servo: "171 At the general Resurrection, everyone will get ..."

Speller: " "I was watching a documentary last night on Amaz ..."

LenNeal gets it over with: "I for one would find that interesting. Posted by ..."

FenelonSpoke: "I'm not listening to anyone talk about religion fo ..."

Montec : "So because AOC does something wrong, everyone shou ..."

Tom Servo: "I for one would find that interesting. I’m o ..."

Montec : "I’m being bombarded by clot shot ads online. ..."

Chatterbox Mouse: "At the general Resurrection, everyone will get a n ..."

Recent Entries

Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64