Sponsored Content




Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!



Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

NoVaMoMe 2024: 06/08/2024
Arlington, VA
Details to follow


Texas MoMe 2024: 10/18/2024-10/19/2024 Corsicana,TX
Contact Ben Had for info





















« Romney: Layoffs In Bain Takeovers Weren't Any Different From Obama Laying Off Thousands When He Took Over GM | Main | Judge Napolitano: Only Ron Paul Believes In Freedom, The Other Candidates Are Repugnant To Freedom »
January 11, 2012

Great Piece on Romney, By Baseball Crank

Losing my religion.

The other point I would make about integrity is that it goes close to the core of why a Romney nomination worries me so much: because we would all have to make so many compromises to defend him that at the end of the day we may not even recognize ourselves. Romney has, in a career in public office of just four years (plus about 8 years' worth of campaigning), changed his position on just about every major issue you can think of, and his signature accomplishment in office was to be wrong on the largest policy issue of this campaign.

Yes, Obama is bad, and Romney can be defended on the grounds that he can't possibly be worse. Yes, Romney is personally a good man, a success in business, faith and family. But aside from his business biography, his primary campaign has been built entirely on arguments and strategies - about touting his own electability and dividing, coopting or delegitimizing other Republicans - none of which will be of any use in the general election. What, then, will we as politically active Republicans say about him?

...Mitt Romney's record is just one endless sheet of thin ice as far as the eye can see - there's no way to have any kind of confidence that we can tell people he stands for something today without being made fools of tomorrow. We who have laughed along with Jim Geraghty's prescient point that every Obama promise comes with an expiration date will be the ones laughed at, and worse yet we will know the critics are right. Every time I try to talk myself into thinking we can live with him, I run into this problem. It's one that particularly bedeviled Republicans during the Nixon years - many partisan Republicans loved Nixon because he made the right enemies and fought them without cease or mercy, but the man's actual policies compromised so many of our principles that the party was crippled in the process even before Watergate. We can stand for Romney, but we'll find soon enough that that's all we stand for.

Let me repeat yet again: So if the only real rationale for Romney is that he is, supposedly, electable -- which is a concern I think is important -- isn't it crucial to kick the tires of this so-called electablity and see if it's in the shape it's claimed to be?

I'll give you an example. I long considered Romney the most electable candidate myself. At least with moderates. The polls all said so, after all.

Now, I didn't favor him because I thought his candidacy would split the party and and I didn't like most of his actual political impulses, but I generally believed him to be more electable than anyone else.

I knew about his flip-flops, of course. I knew about them intellectually. I considered them intellectually. I weighed them intellectually, as regards an intellectual exercise, figuring out what he might do if actually in office.

Then I saw that highlight reel of his flip-flops from the DNC. And suddenly those flip-flops weren't just intellectual to me anymore. Now I looked at Romney and thought, "Ugh. This guy is literally willing to say anything, isn't he? How pathetic. How dishonest."

I always thought the flip-flops wouldn't be a concern in the general election because, hey, if he flip-flops from conservative to moderate and back again that should make him more attractive to moderates, right?

But not when you see them all and begin to doubt his character, which I had hitherto believed squeaky-clean and a strength of his.

Some of these are bs (supporting a stimulus is not the same thing as supporting Obama's failed stimulus; 95% of elected Republicans favored their own style of tax-cut-heavy stimulus; saying "TARP ought to be ended" is not the same as reversing himself on supporting it for the first two years), but others -- on abortion, assault weapons, and Reagan -- are troubling.



digg this
posted by Ace at 01:52 PM

| Access Comments




Recent Comments
"Perfessor" Squirrel: "Whatever that part of the bridge is called. Pier, ..."

Lizzy[/i]: ">>Heh - just realized. Doofenshmirtz Evil Incorpo ..."

Gryph: "249 I get that. But if I am informed of the ri ..."

Aetius451AD work phone: "I'd send them a nice fruit basket. ..."

Bulgaroctonus: "The quashinator is in the purview of my cousin - D ..."

It Puts The gp In The Basket: "Whatever that part of the bridge is called. Pier, ..."

Tom Servo: "Zimmerman's piece is good, and sobering. We reach ..."

Climate change : "253 My favorite part of these tragedies is how eve ..."

Tonypete: "Looks to me like the Dali steered deliberately int ..."

Thomas Paine: "I don't have any particular conspiracy theory yet ..."

Aetius451AD work phone: "That's 'back holes', eromero. ..."

... : "My favorite part of these tragedies is how everyon ..."

Recent Entries
Search


Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64