Sponsored Content

Intermarkets' Privacy Policy

Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!

Recent Entries
Absent Friends
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

2000s - Media scorns Truthers. Period.
2010s - Media scorns Birthers and calls them Republicans. [ArthurK]
| Main | New Season of Doctor Who Starts Tonight
April 23, 2011

Has Ryan Really Ruled Out Running?

I've been wondering about this because I'd written off Ryan ("My kids are too small and my ego's not big enough") and yet there continue to be these mentions of him as a prospect by the conservative media.

I asked Bill Kristol about this at Breitbart's book signing -- I keep hearing Weekly Standard people, particularly, hint that Ryan is entertaining the idea of a run.

Joking around, he said, "Oh, we all just say that to each other [at the Weekly Standard]" -- meaning, "We're all psyching ourselves up with that and/or attempting to put out that rumor out there."


But I asked another journalist type (I won't say who since I didn't tell him I'd be quoting, it was a personal type question) and he said, "Well, he rules it out in his public statements but in his private statements...?" Not so much.

I asked, to be sure, if he was saying "Who knows what he says in private?" or if he was saying "I've heard what he says in private, and he's not as firm on it as he is in public declarations." He confirmed it was the latter.

I think the situation he'd be willing to consider it is if there's no unifying, consensus figure in the primaries.

Just noting.

I'm not sure if I am supposed to quote this, but Kristol said he had a "contrarian" take on Trump and birtherism -- which is basically my take. Birtherism may be untrue, but it's not nearly as damaging and radioactive as some parts of the establishment-oriented base of the party seem to think. And Trump, he agrees, is performing a useful function by, as I said, "treating Obama like an ordinary politician" and beating hell out of him -- not only does this bring Obama down to earth, and make it seem less taboo to not treat him with the deference reserved for the Sun King, but heck, who knows, maybe more Republicans will get the hint that it's okay to start hitting Obama hard.

By the way, speaking of "Narratives" -- it's The Narrative that other Republicans aren't hitting Obama hard. That's not really true. A lot of them are. Mitt Romney's hitting Obama hard, for example. Gingrich has never been shy. Palin has been for years (but the media doesn't like quoting her when she does, eh?).

It's just that it doesn't seem like they are. I guess Trump's brash style (and its amplification throughout the media) makes it sound like he's the only one doing this.

Not so, but he's the one getting through the most.

So, at the very least, I think Trump is at least softening him up. Maybe Trump's not doing something that others aren't, but the media is responding differently -- actually bothering to put his soundbites on the air.

Maybe they think it's safe to do that because Trump is a "joke" in their eyes. I don't really agree with their line of logic if that's what they're thinking.

Kristol noted-- "If the birtherism thing is as damaging as the media thinks, why are Obama's poll numbers falling while Trump's mainstreaming it?"

Good point. (Not that it helps, mind you, but it doesn't seem to be hurting, either.)

I told Kristol that it had long been my theory that birtherism was harmless politically, "All the hardcore conservative outlaws like us are saying that now." Since, you know, he has a reputation as a RINO and I get the RINO label myself.

Maybe it's not that funny. I laughed.

Breitbart gave a short speech about his determination to take on the media in their own villainous lairs (he used that analogy), such as MSNBC's studios. He spoke of his interview with indictment by celebrity jagoff "reporter" Martin Bashir, identifying him as "the man who put the thought of suicide in Michael Jackson's head."

He also noted, laughing, that people who give him fair interviews (he named Dylan Ratigan and Elliot Spitzer as liberals who were fair) do nothing for his book sales, and he walks out of those interviews saying, "Damn, missed opportunity."

On the other hand, Martin Bashir-type interviews go viral and sell his books.

If you watch that Bashir interview (below), by the way, it's a good example of what I mean when I say "Liberals don't lower themselves to ask us information-seeking questions." Bashir made statements phrased as questions, but they weren't questions, because at no point did Bashir even accept Breitbart's statements, for the sake of argument, as true. He just either said they weren't true or re-asked the question, which is not-so-subtle-code for, "You're a liar, answer me truthfully this time."

Generally, even when you suspect someone is telling a falsehood, it's good form not to simply call that person a liar, but accept their claim for the sake of argument but then ask them to explain any inconsistencies that might cause. Like, "Okay, let's say that was your intent with Shirley Sherrod, but then why did you X?"

Bashir doesn't even do that. It's just -- Liar. Honestly, I don't even think he's listening. He literally will not let Breitbart finish a statement, and he begins cutting him off not during a sixty second filibuster but more times than not on the third or fourth word of an answer.

Before Breitbart's even matched a verb to a noun.

How the hell do you cut someone off based on just a noun?

"My article--"


What? There can't be a lie if there's only a noun.





"Delta rays--"



"Ooh, you dirty liar."

So, obviously-- not really asking for the sake of generating information.

Best part is Bashir's odd and varied claims regarding when guilt by association is and is not fair. Bashir claims he can't be held responsible for MSNBC cutting off the head of a black gun-carrier and calling him white in order to advance the narrative that angry white Tea Partiers are carrying guns -- because Bashir wasn't at MSNBC then. (He also refuses to acknowledge it even happened; he doesn't say, "I know that happened, but that wasn't me." He sort of denies it happened.)

But having established the proposition that Bashir can't be held responsible for his coworkers, he then rakes Breitbart over the coals for a blogger who posted a few times on one of his sites and said something racist elsewhere, and also, an Orange County Republican who Breitbart has no connection to sending out a racially-charged photoshop of Obama.

As this one version of the clip got 99,000 views in three days, I guess Breitbart needs to thank Bashir.

digg this
posted by Ace at 06:04 PM

| Access Comments

Recent Comments
gourmand du jour: "I put in a security cam to record things in front ..."

Sponge - F*ck Joe Biden: "Indian tribes have gone woke? Fine. F*CK YOU t ..."

RedMindBlueState[/i][/b][/s][/u]: "[i]One night in Bangkok makes a hard man humble N ..."

Jamaica : "Queens is the county I am in Accomack county Va. i ..."

Dash my lace wigs!: "Cafe is open! ..."

Hunter Biden: "LOL, Snowy-nosed reindeer! ..."

Dash my lace wigs!: "Reindeer! Cute! ..."

JM in /Ill -- Behold the Manchurian Candidate: "Just a reminder that Congressman Cuellar was carja ..."

Admirale's Mate: "nood cafe ..."

jim (in Kalifornia): "281 The Great Hurricane of 178... Killed over 2 ..."

Anna Puma: "#1 reason they can name more storms - Satellit ..."

BifBewalski [/s] [/u] [/i] [/b]: "Bangkok ?? One night in Bangkok makes a hard ma ..."

Recent Entries

Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64