Intermarkets' Privacy Policy

Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!

Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

Obama and the Corps [Fritzworth] | Main | Voting Present: Barone, Cost Push the Meme
March 14, 2011

Mathematical Fact: You Can't Tax The Rich Enough To Pay Down the Deficit

The Republicans need to read every word of this and memorize every single figure, and then memorize additional figures that illustrate the problem, and repeat them endlessly on every Sunday talk show they appear on and every speech they make.

I keep saying this: There simply are not enough rich such that taxing them at even high rates can do more than dent the enormous deficits.

See, the Democrats only remain competitive, and are able to not be ridden out of town on a rail when defending grants for Cowboy Poetry, because the woefully-uninformed public thinks there's always some easy method of fixing things.

They think if we just cut the pittance of what we spend on foreign aid we'll balance the budget. They don't think we need to reform entitlements; just cutting the $20 billion (or whatever) we spend on foreign aid should do the trick, they figure.

But more than that, they think if we're ever in a jam we can just tap the rich for more money.

I do not understand why the Republicans allow the Democrats to claim this. Even when they're not claiming it explicitly, they're claiming it implicitly -- Obama keeps selling his return-to-Clinton-tax-rates on the rich as the extent of his budget plan. The implication is if we just do this, we'll be solvent.

No. No no no no no. A thousand times no. As Kevin D. Williamson explains, even outright seizing the estates -- every last dollar -- of "the rich" will not get us anywhere near solvent.

The public is against making any real cuts to just about anything. (Except foreign aid.) That's understandable, I guess. But their reluctance to cut anything else is driven by the idea in the back of their heads that they would prefer that we just tax the rich a little more and cut foreign aid and everything will just be copacetic.

They have to be made to understand -- this cannot be repeated enough -- that the only way to sustain the current levels of spending (or even the much lower spending of the year 2001!) is to increase taxes on the middle class by 20% or 30% or so.

See, they don't understand the actual dimensions of this crisis. They think they can have their cake (same levels of spending) and eat it too (no tax hikes on them, but only on other people).

If they are made to understand the true situation, that the choice is not between lower spending and taxing the rich, but rather between lower spending and taxing the middle class, they will be a lot more inclined to vote for lower spending.

But as long as Obama and the Democrats and the media can hold out this phantasmal cake-and-eat-it-too option of taxing other people, they'll keep selecting that wonderful, but entirely imaginary, choice.

Every Republican should have this argument ready to be deployed at a moment's notice -- "Okay, let's concede we raise taxes on the rich to Clinton levels. That brings in $1 trillion over ten years. Now, what do we do about the addition $13 trillion in deficits your preferred level of spending requires?"

Republicans must, must, must make the public understand that the relevant question is not whether we tax the rich more. The important question -- the one they must ask again and again -- is who do you tax next after your piffle in tax increases fails to reduce the deficit by even 10%?

The Democrats want to just keep telling us who they'd tax first. Fine. They'll tax the rich first.

But who will they tax second, third, and fourth? Because their first round of increased taxation is only a bit more than a rounding error.

digg this
posted by Ace at 01:14 PM

| Access Comments

Recent Comments
Count de Monet: "Buenas Nachos! ..."

Moron Robbie - Until scrubbed docs show other it's safe to assume the antifa shooter was a tranny: "Ardy ran bonhomme of because of his religion why d ..."

Oedipus: "Dude, was this a clean first shot by Ace? I don't ..."

Eye Socket is a DNA Cup Holder: "561 Where is Dan Crenshaw? Posted by: Soothsayer ..."

ALH: "Yabba Dabba Do! ..."

OrangeEnt: "Is that Chicago on fire in the far background, Mis ..."

AlaBAMA: "Man has 11 children! ..."

Anonymous Rogue in Kalifornistan (ARiK): "Thank you for ONT Mis Hum. Great pic up top. Are ..."

Scarlett O'Hara : "What a night of powerful personal stories. ..."

ALH: "Top 10 ..."

AlaBAMA: "WWII vet from Wisconsin! ..."

Ciampino - Wed Update #01: "The link for Quote II gave me a 404 error. ..."

Recent Entries

Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64