Global Warming Part II: It Really Doesn't Matter What The Facts Are; The Important Thing Is That Our Theory Is Vindicated No Matter What The Facts Are

Allah makes a good point that deserves underscoring. Former Senator Bob Kerrey just made the claim that he doesn't know what Loughner's politics are (they're sort of pro-Matrix), and further, that we shouldn't read much into his politics whatever they are.

That said, he's pretty sure it's the right's fault. No one can say what drove Loughner violently mad; but we're pretty confident it's anger caused by the Tea Party at ObamaCare.

Here''s Allah on that:

There’s not a shred of evidence I know of to support his theory and Kerrey himself seems to breeze past it as if it’s an afterthought, quickly qualifying it by noting that Loughner’s obviously disturbed and that his politics aren’t of much significance. But maybe that’s the point — that we’ve now reached the point with this story where the facts are so tangential and egregious smears so casual that this bubbled up to his lips almost instinctively. The past two days have been the media equivalent of a 50-car pile-up, the “conservatives did it!” narrative crashing headlong into the fact of this guy’s apolitical madness over and over again.

In the Reynolds piece I linked before, Insty quoted Justice Cardoza as saying that "negligence in the air will not do," which I presume referred to proving the case for a tort (a general harm) at law. What such a suit requires is:

1) A duty of care on the part of the alleged tortfeasor (tort-committer)

2) A breach of that duty (the negligence)

3) A proximate cause between that breach and the harm suffered, and

4) an actual harm.

This is why I think liberals are talking so vaguely here. They desperately want to prove their case -- the tort, I suppose, of incitement to murder -- and here they have what they assert is both a duty and a breach (thou shalt not call Obama a socialist, but apparently you can call Bush a murderer), and now they have a harm -- six dead.

So they have, in their minds, 1, 2, and 4, but alas not 3. Oh well! Close enough! Three out of four ain't bad, as the song says. (Sort of.) And this is why they talk like crazy about parts 1 and 2 (a "climate of hate") and 4 ("senseless violence") but get very, very quiet about that crucial number three -- an actual more-or-less direct chain of cause-and-effect between the negligence and the harm suffered.

"Negligence in the air will not do," Cardoza said -- the negligence must be traced, more or less directly, to the harm alleged. A general purported negligence or bad activity hanging in the air which doesn't actually have anything to do with the harm suffered will not, in fact, suffice to replace the requirement of negligence proximately causing the harm. The fact that one driver at a taxicab company is habitually drunk at work doesn't help you prove your case against that company if that driver actually wasn't at work that day and wasn't driving the car that hit you. You may have "negligence in the air," but that negligence had nothing to do with the harm you suffered.

If you don't have three, you have no case.

And here, liberals have no case. But they don't care. They know they have no connection between 1 and 2 and 4 but they don't care; they want to score their political points anyway. So they just keep yelling about their pet theory that Sarah Palin makes Conservative Robots kill people, and how horrible this crime was (which it was, of course), blipping right over that important part in the middle: What hath the former to do with the latter?

Nothing, it seems, nothing at all, but if they keep screaming enough about it, maybe people will decide that 1 and 2 and especially 4 have been proven so damn well we'll give the liberals a pass on 3.

The South Park Assassination Gnomes. The underpants gnomes famously had a three-part business plan:

1. Steal underpants

2. ???

3. Profit!

They could never quite explain how 1 should lead to 3.

Similarly the liberals at the moment want desperately to talk about how conservatives are violent moral degenerates. They cannot actually link that to the news of the day, the mass-shooting in Tucson. But they don't care. They'll continue talking about it with that big bullet point of "???" in the middle until everyone in the country is convinced that somehow Sarah Palin is responsible for this shooting, even if they don't really explain how she's responsible.

Mugshot of the Decade:

Is that a Tea Party twinkle I espy in his eyes? Why yes, I think it is.

Watching Hardball, I've become infuriated; Matthews keeps saying "I want to be careful here" but then keeps asking, essentially, "Come on, don't you think he listens to Rush Limbaugh?"

David "Sucker of Cock" Corn mentions some crank called "David Wynn-Miller" (I think) who he claims is "popular among the right," whose crazy stuff about finding mathematical codes in government statement is said to have resonated with the idiot Loughner.

I have never heard of this person. Have you? I have to google just to find his the correct spelling of his name.

Now -- is he "popular among the right"?

Is this their Element 3? Some fucking guy no one ever heard of?

Here's Miller. Okay, I looked him up. Do you remember that nutter who declared himself a sovereign nation? That seems to be him.

Miller is from Milwaukee, Wisconsin, and he describes himself as a "Plenipotentiary-Judge", an ambassador, banker, postmaster,[7] King of Hawaii, and a genius.[8][9][10]

On April 6, 1988, Miller invented what he calls the Mathematical Interface for Language or Quantum-Math-Communications and Language[11] or Correct-Language.[12] According to Miller, his language is "for the stopping-claims of the Theft, Cheating, Fraud, Slavery and War."[11] Miller's language uses sentences that begin with prepositional phrases, using the word For, are at least thirteen words long, and have many more nouns than verbs. According to Miller, only nouns have legal authority. The language has an abundance of punctuation. Miller explains:

FOR THE FORMS OF OUR PUNCTUATIONS ARE WITH THE CLAIM OF THE USE: FULL-COLON=POSITION-LODIO-FACTS, HYPHEN=COMPOUND-FACTS =KNOWN, PERIOD=END-THOUGHT, COMMA-PAUSE, AND LOCATION-TILDES WITH THE MEANINGS AND USES OF THE COMMUNICATIONS WITH THE FULL-COLON OF THE POSITION-LODIAL-FACT-PHRASE WITH THE FACT/KNOWN-TERM OF THE POSITIONAL-LODIO-FACT-PHRASE AND WITH THE VOID OF THE NOM-DE-GUERRE = DEAD-PERSON.[11]

According to Miller's teaching, the addition of hyphens and colons to one's name turns one from an ordinary, taxable human into a non-taxable “prepositional phrase.” They are distinguished from the names listed at birth in all capital letters (as on a birth certificate), which he claims turns one into a taxable Person (Corporation). (i.e. DAVID WYNN MILLER as opposed to :David-Wynn: Miller.).”[13]

"Popular among the right." Right, so fucking popular I had to google him, and (assuming he's the "Sovereign nation" guy I think he is) I and the whole conservative blogosphere goofed on him when he declared himself sovereign territory.

Oh: And here's his webpage.

IS =SINGULAR-VERB, ARE = PLURAL-VERB ~2-~JANUARY-~2000-NOW-TIME

~1 FOR THE WWW.DWMLC.COM OF THESE FACTS ARE WITH THESE CLAIMS BY THIS PLENIPOTENTIARY-JUDGE'S-CORRECT-SENTENCE-STRUCTURE-COMMUNICATION-SYNTAX-LANGUAGE(C.-S.-S.-C.-S.-L.)

~2 FOR THE YEAR~1988~APRIL~6 OF THIS ORIGINAL-COPYRIGHT-COPYCLAIM IS WITH THIS CLAIM OF THIS PLENIPOTENIARY-JUDGE: David-Wynn: Miller WITH THE COVERY/CLOSURE/LIVERY OF THE CORRECT-MATHEMATICAL-COMMUNICATION-SYNTAX-LANGUAGE: FRONTWARDS-AND-BACKWARDS.

~3 FOR THIS STYLE OF THE SYNTAX-WRITINGS ARE WITH THESE CLAIMS OF THESE CERTIFICATIONS OF THE SYNTAX-LANGUAGES AND: QUANTUM-MATH-COMMUNICATION-SYNTAX WITH THE FRONT-WARDS AND BACKWARDS-MEANINGS OF THESE POSITIONS OF THESE [PREPOSITION]=POSITION WITH THESE FACTS-AS-FACTS AND NOW-TIME-AS-NOW-TIME OF THESE SAME TERMS, DUTIES, MEANINGS, CAUSES WITH THE NOW-TIME. [SAME-MEANINGS FOR THE BRIDGE IS OVER THE RIVER. FOR THE RIVER IS UNDER THE BRIDGE. ABOVE-BELOW, UP-DOWN, IN-OUT, ON-OFF]

~4 FOR THE SENTENCES OF THE COMMUNICATION'S-COURSE/STUDY-GUIDE/STYLES-MANUAL/LEARNING-GUIDES ARE WITH THESE SYNTAX-CLAIMS OF THE C.-S.-S.-C.-S.-L. OF THE READING AND WRITING FRONTWARD AND BACKWARDS.

~5 FOR THE CORRECT-COMMUNICATIONS OF A FACT ARE WITH THE CLAIM OF THE WRITING IN A CIRCLE BY AN AUTHOR.

~6 FOR THE MATHEMATICAL-QUANTUM-COMMUNICATIONS OF THESE SENTENCES ARE WITH THE CLAIM OF THE MANY-WAYS WITH THE KNOWN=FACT/b>(WITH A LINE OVER THE OW = ONE-VOWEL=LODIO=ORIGINAL-JURISDICTION=OWNERSHIP = LAW = WITH THE LINE OVER THE AW) IN THE SENTENCE MAINTAINING THE EXACT MEANING.

~7 FOR THE WORKINGS OF THE QUANTUM-MATH-COMMUNICATIONS AND LANGUAGE ARE FOR THE STOPPING-CLAIMS OF THE THEFT, CHEATING, FRAUD, SLAVERY AND WAR.

~8 FOR THE PEOPLE ON THIS PLANET-EARTH ARE WITH THIS NEEDING-CLAIM OF THE CLOSURE/COVERY/LIVERY OF THIS QUANTUM-MATH-COMMUNICATIONS WITH THE KNOWLEDGE-VOID OF THE COMMUNICATION-CLOSURES WITH THE FICTION-MODIFICATIONS OF ALL COMMUNICATIONS WITH THESE 5000-FICTIONAL-LANGUAGES AND COMMUNICATIONS.

~9 FOR THE WRITTEN-HISTORY(8500-YEARS) OF THIS EARTH IS WITH THE MATH-CLAIM OF THE VOID-WAR WITH A MATH-PROBLEM. (1+1=2 AND 2-1=1)

~10 FOR THE MATH OF THE FRONTWARD IS WITH THE CLAIM OF THE CORRECTIONS WITH THE BACKWARDS BY THE CORRECT-SYNTAX-WORDING.

~11 FOR THE CORRECT-SENTENCE-STRUCTURE-COMMUNICATION-SYNTAX-LANGUAGE OF THE FACTS ARE WITH THE CLAIM OF THE ONE-IN-900-TERMS OF EACH WORD'S-CORRECT-MEANING WITHIN THE SENTENCE-STRUCTURE.

~11 FOR THE CORRECT-SENTENCE-STRUCTURE-COMMUNICATION-SYNTAX-LANGUAGE-CLAIMS OF THESE STYLES IS WITH THE CLAIM OF THE COPYRIGHT/COPYCLAIM WITH OF READING AND WRITING AND SPEAKING WITH A MATHEMATICAL-QUANTUM-SYNTAX OF THE FACTS-AS-FACTS WITH THE NOW-TIME.

~12 FOR THE WORDS OF A SENTENCE ARE WITH THE CLAIM OF THE 900-MEANINGS WITH THE [PREPOSITIONAL-PHRASE]=POSTION-LODIAL-FACT-PHRASE AS THE CLAIMANT OF THE TERMS/DEFINITIONS.

~13 FOR THE WORDS OF THESE MEANINGS ARE WITH THE CLAIM OF THE 300-MILLIOM TO ONE ODDS OF THE CORRECT SENTENCE IN THE FICTION AND 100%-CORRECT IN THE CORRECT-SYNTAX-COMMUNICATION-METHODS.

~14 FOR THE SENTENCE OF THE MANY WORDS WHERE EACH WORD IS WITH THE CLAIM OF THE MANY-TERMS/DEFINITIONS WITH THE ONE-SENTENCE = ONE MEANING = ONE PICTURE = ONE VOLITION = NOW-TIME-FACT OF THE DOCUMENT: TRUE OR FALSE, FACT OR FICTION.

~16 IS FOR THE READING, SPEAKING AND WRITING OF THE CORRECT-SENTECE-STRUCTURE-COMMUNICATION-SYNTAX-LANGUAGE(C.-S.-S.-C.-S.-L.)?

~17 FOR THE SENTENCE OF THE 2-[PREPOSITIONAL PHRASES]: FOR THE BRAIN-LIVE/COMPUTER-CAUSE OF THE FACT-MEANING IS WITH THE CLAIM BY AN AUTHORITY WITH THE ONE-VERB(IS/ARE) IN A SENTENCE WITH THE POSITION-TERMS OF THE CONTRACT AND WITH AN [ARTICLE=AILING=corruption FROM THE BEGINNING] :CORRECTION: "LODIAL"=LO=LOCATION, DI=ORIGINAL, AL=CONTRACT WITH THE [NOUN = NO-NO = VOID-FACT] :CORRECTION: = KNOWN(LINE OVER "OW")= FOR THE "OWN-YOUR-FACT" IN THE NOW-TIME. KNOWN = KNOW=KNOW-LEDGE LEDGER-VALUE, NOW-TIME, OWN=LODIAL.

~18 [(PRE)POSITIONAL-PHRASE] = [PRE]POSITION, [AR]TICLE, [NO]UN]=FICTION

Come on, guys, you know-- the David Wynn Miller. The straw that stirs the conservative Margarita. The guy who shows us how to all be sovereign nations -- by speaking Dahlek.

Oh, I meant DAVID WYNN: MILLER. Sorry, I shouldn't have used his tax-slave name.

posted by Ace at 05:48 PM

| Access Comments