Sponsored Content




Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!



Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

NoVaMoMe 2024: 06/08/2024
Arlington, VA
Details to follow


Texas MoMe 2024: 10/18/2024-10/19/2024 Corsicana,TX
Contact Ben Had for info





















« Ancient Document Written In Foreign Language By Some Dead White Guys Being Read In House Of Representatives | Main | Seth MacFarlane, The Tea Party, & Social Equality »
January 06, 2011

WashTimes' Misleading Headline: "Values Groups Out at CPAC"

This is apparently going to be a fixture in second-tier media and online media until CPAC in February, but -- as I noted here -- the family feud does not pit CPAC against social conservatives.

The Washington Times today has an article headlined: "Gay group in, values groups out at CPAC: Social conservatives to skip gathering."

That is simply not the case. Many social conservative groups are still attending as "participating organizations" (the same status as GOProud). They include pro-life groups, Christian ministries groups, and family values groups. Of course, these will be participating in CPAC with many participating organizations that aren't socially conservative, including tax reform advocates, limited government groups, economic conservatives, an English-advocacy group and a group seeking to legalize online gambling.

The only folks who benefit from portraying the boycott as a generalized abandonment of CPAC by social conservatives are Democrats (who love a good conservative crack-up) and the few groups who have chosen to absent themselves. They are putatively led by Family Research Council, but as I have repeatedly noted, FRC wasn't going to participate this year (or last) anyway and so aren't really boycotting as a result of GOProud inclusion. FRC now operates a rival conference, the Values Voters Summit and therefore simply benefits by drawing attendance away from CPAC.

The Washington Times adds Heritage to the list of "values groups" boycotting, but that isn't related to GOProud either. When Heritage announced its decision last month, it didn't link its attendance to GOProud. Instead, Heritage said that it's a budget issue:

"With the rise of the Tea Party groups this year, there have been more and more meetings we've been going to, and we're trying to reach out to new conservatives," said James Weidman, a Heritage spokesman. "We have a limited budget for outreach and we've got more and more organizations out there that want our outreach."

"We've been a fixture at CPAC for years. I'm not sure we're going to reach any new people there," Weidman added.

The boycotting groups, which include the Center for Military Readiness, the American Family Association, the American Principles Project, the Liberty Counsel and the National Organization for Marriage, continually suggest that CPAC is trying to push them out of the movement.

Andy Blom, executive director of the American Principles Project, called the move to marginalize values voters self-defeating.

"The rather arrogant treatment of social conservatives by libertarians is troubling," said Mr. Blom. "Social conservatives are the foot soldiers of the movement. Marriage has never lost an election. Being pro-life does not lose elections. It wins elections. This is not only a serious principle mistake, it's a serious political mistake."

Blom doesn't seem to acknowledge the existence of economic conservatives, or admit that both social conservatives and economic conservatives are necessary for conservative candidates to continue to win elections. And once again he claims that CPAC is "marginalizing" social conservatives when, in fact, CPAC continues to welcome both social conservatives and economic conservatives. It was these groups' decision to marginalize themselves simply because they refuse to be put on the same list with a gay group.

Another socially conservative group that isn't part of the boycott seems to recognize that self-marginalization will only reduce social conservative influence:

Groups such as Citizen Link, the political-action arm of Focus on the Family, plan to attend this year's CPAC, but say the conference is on a short leash.

"It's obvious the influence of social conservatives has been missing and there needs to be more of it," said Tom Minnery, senior vice president of Citizen Link. "If the ACU can't manage this problem that they've brought upon themselves, we'll have to make another decision."

The point is that CPAC is the paramount annual gathering of conservatives; if these groups want their influence to be felt, they have to show up. CPAC continues to welcome them and, of course, thousands of social conservatives will still show up for the conference despite the boycott.


digg this
posted by Gabriel Malor at 12:05 PM

| Access Comments




Recent Comments
Sponge - F*ck Joe Biden: "Joe Scarborough murdered his intern. MSNBC fund ..."

Gryph: "52. Fraud fraud fraud. Whatever plan Trump has ..."

m: "151 150 Also: Don't Stop Thinkin' About Tomorrow ..."

Sponge - F*ck Joe Biden: "FIRST!!!!! ..."

fd: " Turnout. Turnout. Turnout I don't want to hear ..."

Chuck Martel: "“student-led effort to pass a resolution pro ..."

Sponge - F*ck Joe Biden: "FIRST!!!!! ..."

The FBI, A Criminal Outfit: "The Baltimore bridge crash to me appears to be a l ..."

Ignoramus: "Turnout. Turnout. Turnout. Many "reliable" elem ..."

Gryph: "45. I prefer to think of them as ideological Bols ..."

[/i][/b][/s][/u]I used to have a different nic: "[i]They could've just shut their cakeholes and acc ..."

callsign claymore: "Good morning, JJ, Horde Lieberman seemed like a ..."

Recent Entries
Search


Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64