Sponsored Content

Intermarkets' Privacy Policy

Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!

Recent Entries
Absent Friends
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

College Football Bowl Pickem | Main | There's No Getting Around It: Even When Palin Doesn't Really Say Something It's a Front Page Media Story Because They Need the Hits
December 15, 2010

Paul Ryan: This Js The Best Deal We Can Get on Tax Cuts

But is it?

Ryan focuses on the unlikelihood of securing a permanent extension of the Bush Tax Cuts and getting the death tax frozen at zero. I will assume that's true, because it seems so -- liberals need a sop.

But what about all the pork?

This raises a question about priorities among conservatives. Let's say that a certain number of conservatives will defect away from voting for the deal due to it being not strong enough as far as keeping current low tax rates permanent. That means that some number of Democrats will have to be lured into voting for the bill in their place, and that, I imagine, means pork.

So the strategic choice I'm seeing here is this:

Conservative defectors can swallow hard and vote for the tax deal as regards tax cuts only (that is, refuse to vote for a porked-out bill, but accept the compromise 2-year extension of the income tax cuts for the wealthy and a reduction, but not elimination, of the death tax) or they can refuse to vote for those aspects, in which case the deal needs to be sweetened with pork to induce Democrats to vote for it.

If they'd vote for a "clean bill" (no pork, but with the compromises in place), then all conservatives can vote against the bill in its current form, rejecting the pork, and forcing a new deal containing no pork.

But if they'd also vote against such a clean bill because it's not a pure victory on tax rates, then Democrats need to be brought along, and that means pork.

So I guess what I'm trying to say is that taking a maximalist/pure position on tax rates results in pork.

I'm more against additional spending than I am in favor of pushing for tax cuts permanancy. (Partly because that doesn't seem possible at the moment, with Obama holding the veto pen.) My concern here is that a demand on permanancy results, inevitably, in something else I hate, more pork, more spending, higher deficits.

And to be honest I'm not certain that isn't the kabuki game being played -- that Congress, as a whole, including hold-out "purity" sort of conservatives, actually want one last (???) indulgence in pork, and these claims about needing the pork to get it passed are very convenient for them, as they have their cake (pork) and can eat it too (claim they're against all of this).

Am I wrong here? I'd like to scuttle the bill over the pork (and I think Obama and the Democrats would be in a bad position if we did, as they have made promises about reducing pork too, very recently), but if we did, we'd need the holdouts to agree to vote for the improved, pork-free compromise, which I don't know if they'd do.

digg this
posted by Ace at 12:20 PM

| Access Comments

Recent Comments
Lost In Space: "Enterprise U.2 8TB drives are cheaper than consume ..."

Pixy Misa: "[i]3 Good day Pixy, hope Spring is sufficiently br ..."

actually a hornet: "Buzzz, mother-------. ..."

m: ">>>it rewards other things instead. Interestingnes ..."

Skip : "Couple, yesterday after this fell asleep until 6 ..."

Biden's Dog sniffs a whole lotta malarkey,: "BOING! ..."

m: "330 ..."

Lost In Space: "Good morning Skip. Hope you had a few good hours o ..."

Lost In Space: "Good day Pixy, hope Spring is sufficiently breakin ..."

Skip : "PIXY NOOD IS UP ..."

m: "Busy bees? ..."

Skip : "G'Day everyone ..."

Recent Entries

Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64