Sponsored Content




Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!



Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

NoVaMoMe 2024: 06/08/2024
Arlington, VA
Details to follow


Texas MoMe 2024: 10/18/2024-10/19/2024 Corsicana,TX
Contact Ben Had for info





















« Jon Stewart vs. Glenn Beck | Main | Oh Dear: Nancy Pelosi Pulled FDA Strings To Get Democratic Super-Donor and John Edwards Hush-Money Sugar-Daddy Access To Prohibited Experimental Drug »
August 17, 2010

Judge: The Somali Pirates Who Attacked a Navy Ship Aren't "Pirate-Pirates"

The Navy brought these six guys back to Virginia in April after they fired on the USS Ashland, in what was probably a case of mistaken identity (I mean, who thinks piracy against the US Navy is a good idea?!?). They were charged with a bunch of things, but the most important and obvious of the charges was piracy, which carries a mandatory life sentence.

The defense raised a troubling argument: "piracy" is not defined in statute, but rather by Supreme Court case law. In particular, an 1820 case: "We have, therefore, no hesitation in declaring that piracy, by the law of nations, is robbery upon the sea," Justice Joseph Story wrote for the majority in United States v. Smith. The defendanst argued that they did not complete their act of piracy (they didn't actually rob the USS Ashland because it blew their little raft to smithereens) and so cannot be properly charged as pirates. This would be distinct from an attempted piracy charge, which I guess wasn't or couldn't be (?) made.

The judge bought it.

A judge on Tuesday dismissed piracy charges against six Somali nationals accused of attacking a Navy ship off the coast of Africa, concluding the U.S. government failed to make the case their alleged actions amounted to piracy.

The dismissal of the piracy count by U.S. District Judge Raymond A. Jackson tosses the most serious charge against the men, but leaves intact seven other charges related to the alleged April 10 attack on the USS Ashland in the Gulf of Aden. A piracy conviction carries a mandatory life term.

"The court finds that the government has failed to establish that any unauthorized acts of violence or aggression committed on the high seas constitutes piracy as defined by the law of nations," Jackson wrote in granting the defense motion to dismiss.

Five other Somalis are before a different district court judge and making the same argument. One Somali pleaded guilty. Bet he feels like an idiot.

Much more on the background of the piracy issue was in the Wall Street Journal over the weekend.

More:

This grates so much, like many court decisions these days, because it bugs our common sense. Just see the Stolen Valor post below. Most of the commenters noted quite correctly that obviously these jerks aren't lying about having military medals just for the sake of lying. They're doing it to get stuff: attention, donations, political support, free drinks, whatever. That's freakin' obvious.

And that's part of what makes lying about having service medals objectionable in the first place. These guys are taking recognition that rightfully belongs to actual service medal winners. So they're harming the good guys and they're harming the public at large. Obvious.

So why didn't Congress put that in the Stolen Valor Act? Courts these days demand that every little thing be spelled out in triplicate, so it doesn't matter that this is obvious to everybody. If it doesn't appear in the statute, the courts aren't going to go out of their way to interpret it in. Particularly in a case that runs smack up against the First Amendment.

Same thing happens in this piracy case. In a criminal conviction, particularly one involving a mandatory life sentence, the starting point is: what is "piracy." Because it seems so obvious, Congress never defined it. And now the courts are sitting there wondering if piracy includes failed acts of robbery on the high seas. Oy.

Obvious. But law doesn't work that way. You want to put somebody away for life, you better be sure to get the charges right. Again, that runs smack up against the Fifth and Eighth Amendments. And courts are going to tend to err away from fudging that kind of thing, just because it's "common sense" that they're pirates. Due process and "beyond a reasonable doubt" and all that.


digg this
posted by Gabriel Malor at 03:59 PM

| Access Comments




Recent Comments
DOYLE: "The Muppet show came on after Wild Kingdom where I ..."

Thomas Paine: "https://images.app.goo.gl/awdgt1b7QSymWxL4A Gre ..."

Sponge - F*ck Joe Biden: "[i] Hookers and Blackjack! ~ Bender Posted by ..."

Weasel: " 103 So what was the 8 billion spent on? Posted ..."

Smell the Glove: "@111 Ellison looks like she skated face first into ..."

Yudhishthira's Dice: "This is bullshit. SBF stole an order of magnitude ..."

DoublySymmetric: "103 So what was the 8 billion spent on? Posted by ..."

Jim Fowler: "100 Mr. Perkins will be missed. Posted by: DOYLE ..."

Mike Hammer, etc., etc.: "So, I assume that Ellison is going to skate? ..."

Dr Huge Largemeat: " What sleazy methods will those psychos use n ..."

Sponge - F*ck Joe Biden: "[i]SBF will leave prison and become a fraudster al ..."

bonhomme[/i][/i][/i][/b][/b][/b][/s][/s][/s][/u][/u][/u]: "> How does that work? They basically broke ever ..."

Recent Entries
Search


Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64