Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!



Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups


NoVaMoMe 2024: 06/08/2024
Arlington, VA
Registration Is Open!


Texas MoMe 2024: 10/18/2024-10/19/2024 Corsicana,TX
Contact Ben Had for info





















« Top Headline Comments 7-19-10 | Main | Reminder: Los Angeles Moron Meetup »
July 19, 2010

A Republican Congress?

Wall Street Journal floats the idea that Republicans may take back more than the House in November.

The emergence of competitive Republican candidates in Wisconsin, Washington and California—Democratic-leaning states where polls now show tight races—bring the number of seats that Republicans could seize from the Democrats to 11.

Democrats now control the Senate 59-41—after the death of Democratic Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, who was replaced by Republican Sen. Scott Brown—including two independents who usually vote with them. That means Republicans need 10 seats to take a 51-49 advantage.

Republicans would have to win virtually every competitive race to retake the Senate, without losing any seats of their own—clearly an uphill climb. The trouble for Democrats is that many trends are against them. Surveys show that Republicans are more motivated than Democrats to go to the polls, and that voters are looking for new leadership in Congress.

"I think there is definitely a chance" of losing the Senate, said Democratic strategist Gary Nordlinger, a Washington-based media consultant. "I wouldn't call it a probability, but there is certainly a chance."

"Republicans still have to [win] all the competitive races in order to get to a majority, but at least there are enough seats on the table to pull it off," said Nathan Gonzales, political editor of the non-partisan Rothenberg Political Report.

Now, don't get your hopes up too much. Like it says, this is an uphill battle. I still expect Democrats to start with the usual tricks in September and October -- the feminist dog whistle. The claims that Republicans are going to steal Social Security from seniors. (Unusually, the claims of racism will be blunted from overuse during the past year; the boy-who-cried-racism feature of this presidency may doom typical Democratic race cries for a few years.)

To this point the Democrats have been raising money and taking attacks of opportunity when our candidates stumble. That's not a campaign, that's a holding pattern. Incumbents like Barbara Boxer, Dirty Harry, and Colorado Senator Michael Bennett have millions tucked away while their Republican opponents are campaigning on a shoestring margin.

Still, check out Real Clear Politics Battle for the Senate map. It's possible.


digg this
posted by Gabriel Malor at 11:01 AM

| Access Comments




Recent Comments
[/i][/b]andycanuck (vtyCZ)[/s][/u]: "Last night Fox website said Mark Meadows, Kelli Wa ..."

redridinghood: "It's also... National Lingerie Day. ..."

Yudhishthira's Dice: "And always remember - in the intellectually blight ..."

gp In The Center Of A Stool Boom: ""He lives in a trailer down by the beach" Nowhe ..."

old chick: "Newsmax link to Republicans indicted in Arizona. ..."

ShainS -- Blood-Bath-and-Beyond angel investor [/b][/i][/s][/u]: "WSJ sez Rockford is now America's top housing mark ..."

LinusVanPelt : " The Junta may be counting on a Steal, but it will ..."

J.J. Sefton: "103 House Speaker Mike Johnson reportedly reversed ..."

[/i][/b][/s][/u]I used to have a different nic: "[i]I just saw a poll released yesterday that puts ..."

Don Black: ">where is Rockford ?? Posted by: runner --- ..."

gp In The Center Of A Stool Boom: "105 Ninety miles WNW of Chicago. ..."

JackStraw: ">>Um... Do you remember what happened in the last ..."

Recent Entries
Search


Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64