Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022 Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022 OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published.
Contact OrangeEnt for info: maildrop62 at proton dot me
Ellsworth Splits from Stupak -- Will Vote Yes And Now Cao's "Reconsidering" -- All He Wants Is a Promise The'll Pass the Anti-Abortion Language They Despise So Much
He wants what the fake-pro-life Democrats want -- an empty CYA promise from radical pro-abortionist Nancy Pelosi and the pro-abortion Senate Democrats that they'll themselves consider, maybe, passing a standalone bill forbidding taxpayer funded abortions.
As I mentioned in my last post, the Senate rejected this and only agreed to Ben Nelson's weak, wiggle-room language in order to secure his 60th vote.
What possible reason would either the pro-abortionists in the House and Senate have to pass the tougher Stupak language once the bill is already signed into law and no further deals need be made?