Peer-Reviewed, Baby

In this case the climate study was peer-reviewed -- after being published; not usually the preferred order of doing things -- and was found to be completely bogus.

But good enough for government work.

Rather than blurb it I will say read the whole thing -- it's short and it won't cost you nothin'.

Point is, yet another "scientist" had no idea what the hell he was doing when he ran his software, made lots of errors, concealed those errors, and deliberately choose arbitrary data to give him the scare-scenario he wanted.

And yet Govahnah Shortbus of California is still using it to push his "green" nonsense anyhow. As someone said about California's own multibillion climate studies program -- perhaps California decided it wasn't bankrupt enough.

And here's Ed Begley from last week telling us we can trust the science because it's peer-reviewed.

I know it's old. It's still good.

Peer review doesn't mean much when your peers are all in on the game, too.

It's amazing. They've all been doing this. All along.

Via Hot Air.

posted by Ace at 05:28 PM

| Access Comments