Sponsored Content

Intermarkets' Privacy Policy

Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!

Recent Entries
Absent Friends
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

« Obama's DOJ Imposes Partisan Elections on Sleepy North Carolina Town | Main | Flashback: Hobos and Scandis, ca. 1993
Related: Zogby Interactive Has Obama at 49%
Rasmussen: 47% Approve, 53% Disapprove »
October 21, 2009

Supreme Court Blocks Disclosure of Anti-Gay-Marriage Petition Signers

Yesterday the Supreme Court issued a temporary stay which prohibits the release of the names of individuals who signed petitions for Washington's Referendum 71.

Referendum 71 was placed on the ballot to challenge the legislative expansion of domestic partnerships in Washington to include all the rights and responsibilities of marriage except for the name "marriage." Ordinarily, Washington releases the signatures of ballot referendum petitioners upon request because they are public documents, but the group mainly responsible for collecting the R-71 signatures sued to prevent their release in this instance.

The group argues (PDF) that "due to the highly charged nature of the topic of Referendum 71, (domestic partnerships, gay rights, the traditional definition of marriage, etc.) that the personal information on the petitions for Referendum 71 warrant particular protection." The idea is that the signers' First Amendment rights could be stifled if not stymied by disclosure, especially if we see the type of bad behavior which occurred around California's Prop 8.

A panel of the Ninth Circuit ultimately disagreed and ordered that the group could not prevent the release of the documents. But Justice Kennedy stepped in and referred the question to the full Court, which voted 8-1 to preserve the injunction until the parties have a chance to file a full petition for certiorari.

I've been chewing on this case for a few weeks now and I was initially sympathetic to the petition signers because of the Prop 8-like mischief that might follow disclosure. Now, some of that mischief was constitutionally protected, for example picketing and boycotts. But some of it was criminal, like vandalism and assault.

To the extent that signers want to avoid First Amendment activities like picketing by asserting their own First Amendment rights, the signers don't have a leg to stand on. It also creates a perverse incentive on the part of future petitioners to make every issue a highly contentious one.

I would be persuaded that the signers' First Amendment right to petition (as a form of speech and of redress) would be chilled if the signers' names were made public, except that in Washington the names of petition signers are routinely made public. So the signers knew—or should have known—that by participating they were making a public act. It's disingenuous to come out now and claim that their speech rights could be infringed after they've already exercised their speech rights.

And that was the key for me. If Olympia wants to pass a law which prohibits the release of signatures for ballot referenda, that's great. And then petition signers will have a reasonable belief that their names will not be disclosed. A few states have laws like that. On the other hand, states should be free to make that choice and Washington has decided not to give that protection.

Anyway, the practical result of the Supreme Court's stay is that the issue will not be resolved and the names will not be released before the November 3 election. At the moment R-71 appears likely to be approved, reconfirming the legislative expansion of domestic partnership rights. The Supreme Court's decision might be a blessing in disguise for folks hoping for approval. If bad behavior had been in the offing, backlash might have pushed the vote the other way.

I've tucked a poll under the fold.

digg this
posted by Gabriel Malor at 09:51 AM

| Access Comments

Recent Comments
Commissar Hrothgar (hOUT3) ~ This year in Corsicana - [b]again[/b]! ~ [/i][/b][/u][/s]: "[i]You guys , this is genius ! Posted by: runner ..."

runner: "AI game me some helpful tips for identifying troll ..."

Commissar Hrothgar (hOUT3) ~ This year in Corsicana - [b]again[/b]! ~ [/i][/b][/u][/s]: "[i]It gives structure to the rest of the day Post ..."

Kindltot: "[i]RNC Research @RNCResearch KARINE JEAN-PIERRE: ..."

Commissar Hrothgar (hOUT3) ~ This year in Corsicana - [b]again[/b]! ~ [/i][/b][/u][/s]: "304 Not a bad change for a low effort Horde respo ..."

Cicero (@cicero43): "There's a fix for that. That fix is simple, effici ..."

Commissar Hrothgar (hOUT3) ~ This year in Corsicana - [b]again[/b]! ~ [/i][/b][/u][/s]: "[i]Do you have a tardy slip signed by at least one ..."

Puddleglum, cheer up for the worst is yet to come: "[i]293 Funny, I thought we have been troll free fo ..."

Gorgeous George Orwell: "In a time of universal bullshit, trolling is a rev ..."

NaCly Dog: " Commissar Hrothgar Do you have a tardy slip si ..."

jimmymcnulty: "Not to be gross or rude, but have all leaks in thi ..."

Braenyard: "277 The Hill @thehill "Republicans would cripple ..."

Recent Entries

Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64