Sponsored Content

Intermarkets' Privacy Policy

Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!

Recent Entries
Absent Friends
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

« More Cowbell | Main | Harris Interactive Poll: Obama's Negative Rating Now Exceeds His Positive, 49%-51% »
September 18, 2009

FOXNews/Opinion Dynamics Poll: Only 22% Think They'd Be Better Off Under Obamacare

Sorry to do two poll posts in a row, but this one should get a little attention (PDF).

The big ones, for me, are questions 20 and 21. Only twenty-two percent of registered voters believe Obamacare would make them better off. Even among Democrats, that number is only at thirty-six* percent.

This explains why the President's dire warning that More. People. Will. Die. has not been persuasive. Most Americans look at their own healthcare coverage and do not see the horrific situation that Obama describes. Many are afraid that the President is going to make things worse.

And that's the other big take-away from this poll. Forty-six percent of voters would prefer to stay with the current health system than switch to Obamacare. Only thirty-seven percent prefer the plan proposed by the President.

Of course—and I'm putting this in bold—that does not mean that we're proposing to do nothing. Obamacare is bad and we can do better than Obamacare by sticking with the status quo. But Republicans have been consistent in saying, not only is the status quo better than Obama's plan to destroy the health care industry, but we've got an even better plan than the status quo!

You want competition? Great, let's drop the laws and regs that keep insurers from competing across state lines.

You want to encourage everyone to have health insurance? Great, make individual plans tax-deductible, just like employer plans. De-couple health insurance from employment and we'll end much of the fuss about losing coverage when changing jobs.

(In fact, my preference for health insurance reform is to make it unlawful to offer health insurance as a benefit of employment. In other words, don't just encourage individual plans, make them the only kind of insurance you can get. This also has the benefit of taking care of the "pre-existing condition problem" which strikes when people change insurers incident to changing jobs. If you've had individual insurance since your early twenties and kept that insurance through all of your various employment changes, there'd be no problem.

It would also end the massive distortion in the insurance market caused by large employers and unions which place small businesses at a massive disadvantage. I realize that this option would never fly for that very reason, so I'll stick with the Republicans and aim lower.)

In any case, while it is true that many believe things would be better under the status quo than under Obamacare, Republicans have an even better alternative. If the Democrats in Congress were really interested in increasing competition they'd be working with Republicans instead of drawing their public option line in the sand.


digg this
posted by Gabriel Malor at 11:23 AM

| Access Comments

Recent Comments
Nova Local: "Going away dinner for the Polish guest tonight, co ..."

gophers: "We can just dig another exit hole, ya know. ..."

Rufus T. Firefly: "I was keeping an eye out for this, but once again& ..."

Eromero: "I miss Sears and Robuck. ..."

Rufus T. Firefly: "Her story was nightmarish, but if I recall she was ..."

Skip: "Plumbing leaks suck ..."


All Hail Eris: "Goooood ..."

Skip: "Food fight ..."

Don Black: "I consider the made-in-USA thing to be the authent ..."

LenNeal : "For FWP property, there was a lady here who had so ..."

Grumpy and Recalcitrant: "[i]{155}... 'ethically made' wtf does that mean- ..."

Recent Entries

Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64