|
||
Intermarkets' Privacy Policy Support
Donate to Ace of Spades HQ! Recent Entries
The Morning Rant: Minimalist Edition
Mid-Morning Art Thread The Morning Report — 6/6/23 Daily Tech News 6 June 2023 Monday Overnight Open Thread (6/5/23) The Great Chicken War Cafe Quick Hits Grassley: Source Behind Bribery Accusation of Biden Is "Highly Credible" and Has Been Used by FBI In the Past Have You Heard the Scuttlebutt? Disney Has Another Woke Bomb On Its Hands as Little Mermaid is Projected to Lose Between $50 and $100 Million FOIA'd Texts Reveal that Rochelle Wallensky and AFT Union Leader Randi Weingartner Conspired to Change the Criteria for Re-Opening Schools, To Keep Them Closed Longer Absent Friends
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022 Dave In Texas 2022 Jesse in D.C. 2022 OregonMuse 2022 redc1c4 2021 Tami 2021 Chavez the Hugo 2020 Ibguy 2020 Rickl 2019 Joffen 2014 Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups
NoVaMoMe 2023:
06/10/2023
Registration closes May 31st. Texas MoMe 2021: 10/2o/2023-10/21/2023 Corsicana,TX Contact Ben Had for info |
« Obama Administration to Adjust Projected Deficit; $7 Trillion 10-Year-Defict to Become... $9 Trillion |
Main
| Photoblog: The Shrine of the Bureaucrat »
August 21, 2009
When Is It Appropriate For The Executive Branch To Refuse to Defend the Law?This certainly isn't the first time the question has been asked, but it is coming up frequently in relation to the civil rights movement of my generation: when is it okay for the members of the executive branch to refuse to defend challenges to properly-enacted laws? During last year's challenge to Prop 8 in the California courts, California Attorney General Jerry Brown--the individual empowered to enforce and protect our laws and constitution--refused to defend the constitutionality of the ballot prop. In fact, he eventually argued against the constitutional amendment, suggesting that it could not be reconciled with existing portions of the California Constitution. (Yes, his argument was incoherent.) Similarly, in this year's federal challenge to Prop 8, where Brown and Governor Schwarzenegger are both named plaintiffs, they aren't defending Prop 8. The governor has announced that he intends to remain "neutral" on the question of its constitutionality under the U.S. Constitution. Instead, several groups which helped pass the amendment last year are leading its defense. On the one hand, pro-Prop 8 groups would probably not have appreciated AG Brown's involvement on their side, especially if his heart wasn't in it. On the other hand, isn't it his duty to defend the law? Don't forget the financial element: as a result of AG Brown's decision these groups bear the burden of defending the law by themselves, which would not ordinarily be the case. A similar situation is occuring in Wisconsin. Attorney General J.B. Van Hollen has decided not to defend the state's new domestic partnership law. Like AG Brown with Prop 8, AG Van Hollen believes the domestic partnership law is unconstitutional and cannot be reconciled with Wisconsin's constitutional amendment prohibiting gay marriages or legal statuses "substantially similar" to marriages. The domestic partership law's proponents say that the partnerships aren't "substantially similar" to marriages because they come with only 40 of the approximately 200 legal benefits of marriage. (Although, they are certainly what we think of as key legal benefits of marriage: tax status, late-life benefits, etc.) AG Van Hollen disagrees. Chapter 770 [the domestic partnership law], does not define the legal relationship in terms of benefits, but in terms of criteria for entering the relationship. Those criteria include (1) two adults, (2) of the same sex, (3) who have the capacity to contract, (4) who are unmarried and not in another domestic partnership, (5) who are no closer in relation than second cousins, and (6) who share a common residence. Wis. Stat. § 770.05. So the argument is over whether the marriage amendment prohibits using criteria "substantially similar" to marriage to apportion legal benefits or whether the marriage amendment was intended to prevent giving legal benefits approximating those that come with marriage. In any case, AG Van Hollen will not be defending it (and I suspect he just announced his candidacy for governor). Wisconsin's domestic partnership law became effective August 3. The courts declined to stay the law while the lawsuit is pending. Finally, the Obama Department of Justice has recently filed a brief suggesting that the federal Defense of Marriage Act is discriminatory and should be repealed...in a case where the department is defending DOMA. The department generally defends the constitutionality of laws so long as even a plausible argument can be made. Still, it seems like less than full-throated support to walk into court and tell the judge a law is bad, but not unconsitutional. Especially when the discriminatory effect of laws toward gays is increasingly being taken by courts as unconstitutional. (See Romer, Lawrence, etc.) So what to do? Let the interested parties duke it out while the executive branch decides for itself whether to step in? Perhaps institute a loser-pays rule, requiring the losing party to pay for the prevailing party's costs, to deal with the fact that third parties are now having to step in and do the government's job for it. I'm not sure. What do you think? | Recent Comments
[/i][/b]andycanuck (Vwz3I)[/s][/u]:
"Off, Norman-Viking bastard sock ..."
Puddinhead: "30 I can’t imagine being one of those soldie ..." The guy downstairs: "[i] As a country we had God on our side back then ..." gourmand du jour: "Biden will say he was there and personally killed ..." Caesar North of the Rubicon: "And it is respected by the locals. They remember, ..." 18-1: "[i]I bet none of those Rangers were trans.[/i] ..." m: "Reagan https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CTLVIp1A ..." Warai-otoko : "28 I truly hope that Biden doesn't say anything to ..." Tom C: "Nixon opened the political relationship with China ..." Bulgaroctonus : "I can’t imagine being one of those soldiers ..." REDACTED: "they staged D-Day during Pride Month bastards ..." Cheri: "I truly hope that Biden doesn't say anything too i ..." Recent Entries
The Morning Rant: Minimalist Edition
Mid-Morning Art Thread The Morning Report — 6/6/23 Daily Tech News 6 June 2023 Monday Overnight Open Thread (6/5/23) The Great Chicken War Cafe Quick Hits Grassley: Source Behind Bribery Accusation of Biden Is "Highly Credible" and Has Been Used by FBI In the Past Have You Heard the Scuttlebutt? Disney Has Another Woke Bomb On Its Hands as Little Mermaid is Projected to Lose Between $50 and $100 Million FOIA'd Texts Reveal that Rochelle Wallensky and AFT Union Leader Randi Weingartner Conspired to Change the Criteria for Re-Opening Schools, To Keep Them Closed Longer Search
Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Primary Document: The Audio
Paul Anka Haiku Contest Announcement Integrity SAT's: Entrance Exam for Paul Anka's Band AllahPundit's Paul Anka 45's Collection AnkaPundit: Paul Anka Takes Over the Site for a Weekend (Continues through to Monday's postings) George Bush Slices Don Rumsfeld Like an F*ckin' Hammer Top Top Tens
Democratic Forays into Erotica New Shows On Gore's DNC/MTV Network Nicknames for Potatoes, By People Who Really Hate Potatoes Star Wars Euphemisms for Self-Abuse Signs You're at an Iraqi "Wedding Party" Signs Your Clown Has Gone Bad Signs That You, Geroge Michael, Should Probably Just Give It Up Signs of Hip-Hop Influence on John Kerry NYT Headlines Spinning Bush's Jobs Boom Things People Are More Likely to Say Than "Did You Hear What Al Franken Said Yesterday?" Signs that Paul Krugman Has Lost His Frickin' Mind All-Time Best NBA Players, According to Senator Robert Byrd Other Bad Things About the Jews, According to the Koran Signs That David Letterman Just Doesn't Care Anymore Examples of Bob Kerrey's Insufferable Racial Jackassery Signs Andy Rooney Is Going Senile Other Judgments Dick Clarke Made About Condi Rice Based on Her Appearance Collective Names for Groups of People John Kerry's Other Vietnam Super-Pets Cool Things About the XM8 Assault Rifle Media-Approved Facts About the Democrat Spy Changes to Make Christianity More "Inclusive" Secret John Kerry Senatorial Accomplishments John Edwards Campaign Excuses John Kerry Pick-Up Lines Changes Liberal Senator George Michell Will Make at Disney Torments in Dog-Hell Greatest Hitjobs
The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny More Margaret Cho Abuse Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed" Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means Wonkette's Stand-Up Act Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report! Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet The House of Love: Paul Krugman A Michael Moore Mystery (TM) The Dowd-O-Matic! Liberal Consistency and Other Myths Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate "Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long) The Donkey ("The Raven" parody) |