Intermarkets' Privacy Policy Support
Donate to Ace of Spades HQ! Recent Entries
Music Thread: The Unbearable Lightness Of Messenger Bags
Hobby Thread - October 5, 2024 [TRex] Ace of Spades Pet Thread, October 5 Gardening, Puttering and Adventure Thread, Oct. 5 What would Eric Hoffer, The Longshoreman Philosopher, be thinking about now? The Classical Saturday Morning Coffee Break & Prayer Revival Daily Tech News 5 October 2024 O*N*T The Cafe with No Name Black Female Member of Parliament Is Discovered to be an Anti-Minority Racist By Noting that "Not All Cultures Are Equal" and Saying That She Wants the UK to Embrace Western Values, Not the Third-World Values of the Country She Fled Absent Friends
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024 Captain Hate 2023 moon_over_vermont 2023 westminsterdogshow 2023 Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022 Dave In Texas 2022 Jesse in D.C. 2022 OregonMuse 2022 redc1c4 2021 Tami 2021 Chavez the Hugo 2020 Ibguy 2020 Rickl 2019 Joffen 2014 AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published.
Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups
|
« Taliban Attacks NATO HQ in Afghanistan; 3 Macedonian Soldiers Hurt; Up to 100 Civilians Killed |
Main
| Just a Little Health Advice from Dr. Ace »
August 16, 2009
What Will Be the Next "Health Care Reform" We Can Beat?There's a lot left. Individual mandates, for one. To be perfectly honest with you, I personally am not completely opposed to this one, in principle, assuming it would take a tolerable form. But I don't assume that. It will take an intolerable form. I assume it will take the form of the stupidest, vote-buyingest, most socialistic scheme possible, so I oppose it in fact. So long as it's not greatly socialist -- e.g., young people, with barely any need for insurance at all (which is why they skip it) are overcharged ludicrously so they are forced to subsidize the elderly, who use a lot of insurance dollars. Or rich people are forced to pay money for the poor. In that case, I could kinda get behind it, or at least not bother myself to oppose it strenuously. Or it covers anything except unpredictable, rare, catastrophic health crises. This idea that taxpayers ought to pay for someone's eyeglasses or routine visits to the doctor or utterly-predictable need of antibiotics or flu immunizations is, well, two words; In. Sane. That's not "insurance." Insurance is a contract by which someone agrees to pay if you suffer a rare expense. That's how real insurance manages to be fairly inexpensive -- the risk insured against may be costly as hell (e.g., your house burns down) doesn't happen very often. In the US, "insurance" moved away from real insurance to disguised payments in lieu of wages during the Depression and WWII, where the socialist Roosevelt Administration controlled wages. So firms began offering more and more generous "insurance" to evade/break/semi-legally flout these restrictions, which stopped being insurance against a rare risk, and began becoming simply disguised wages as they paid for things which weren't "risks" at all but inevitabilities, such as your needing to pay for eyeglasses and flu shots and routine check-ups and everything else. The normal maintenance of your body, in other words, the same as buying food. No one could "insure" your need to eat food, as it is not a risk at all but an inevitability. Or, in theory, I could "insure" you against the "risk" you will need to eat at least $100 of food per week, but as it is guaranteed that you will eat that much, the "insurance policy" would have to cost... $100 per week plus administrative and other expenses, meaning you'd pay a company $125 or $135 a week in order to get a $100 check from the company every week. This is exactly what "insurance" has become in the minds of most -- "someone else pays for stuff that in a sane world I'd pay for myself." The reason that employees at companies that pay for insurance get most of this paid for is that their employer is merely paying them wages in a different form; i.e., rather than pay you an extra $10 a week or $500 per year, they'll pay $500 of medical expenses you would otherwise have to pay yourself. They're not "insuring" you. You cannot be "insured" against a "risk" 100% guaranteed to occur. They're just delivering wages in a roundabout fashion. The reason I'm not really against individual mandates, properly fashioned, is that it is a fact that any one of us might get deathly sick or take one wrong step and wind up in traction for a year, and yet of course, even if we don't have insurance, expect the hospital to treat us, even if we can't pay. And of course that means that some of us are free-riding on the insurance other people have/purchase, so we are unfairly extracting money from them. This particular point is not one I think of "socialism" and "state control" versus "freedom." There is not a hardcore libertarian in the world lacking insurance who, if he gets cancer and needs treatments costing $150,000 or more, is really going to say "Do not treat me; I have not paid for this and cannot pay for this; and I refuse, on my libertarian principles, to extract money from another citizen to benefit myself." Doesn't happen. Won't happen. What is really going on is that some people are, of course, willing to game the system so that they don't pay into it but when they need the care, they expect to get it (and mostly will... mostly), but on someone else's dime. Someone else is forced to subsidize them. That may or not technically be "socialism," but it sure ain't capitalism, either. Some people are wealthy enough to self-insure and so should be excluded, but then, they almost all have insurance anyway so the point is practically moot. I suppose that some socialization is expected in America, as regards the most poor and destitute. I suppose that some catastrophic coverage could be provided for the most destitute... but then, if someone's making $35,000 a year, I don't really want to hear he doesn't have However, while I am not against individual mandates in principle, I am against them in fact, because I know damn well that the mandates will break every single one of my rules for acquiescence. It will be heavily socialized, with young subsidizing the old and the rich subsidizing the poor, and even worse, it will not be restricted to less-costly catastrophic coverage (less costly because, even though it's the costliest of all when needed, it is a thankfully rare situation... unlike the very routine fact you need to get flu shots every year). In other words, the idea that some have that they should just sort of "get free shit" on someone else's dime. This is, was, and always will be the central, critical notion of "health care reform" as conceived by the left. Individual mandates for catastrophic coverage don't give politicians any benefit, because most people won't need it and even those who do need it aren't particularly benefited, because, in America, they'd probably get 70-80% of the treatment they needed anyway... just subsidized by those with insurance. So people would tend not to notice they were getting a benefit at all. And of course most of those getting the benefit would have paid for it, so... no free stuff. And no free stuff = no bought votes. If you have to pay for something with your own money, people tend to think they haven't gotten anything from the government. In fact, they've gotten a lot. Self-reliance and the reinforcement of the capitalist model, the greatest wealth-generating system in human history. But they don't notice that. They want free stuff, they want someone else paying their costs, they want someone else picking up the check. If the government isn't putting its hand into someone else's pocket to give them a fraction of someone else's wealth, they don't consider the government to be "working" for them at all. So my whole idea is of course a non-starter. Would never happen, because it doesn't benefit the most important class that must be considered with regard to any legislation -- the legislators themselves.
@2 No way in hell should "catastrophic" insurance cost that much. $10,000 is a lot, but it's now less than an entry-level sedan. Yes, a poor family would have to scrimp to pay this off over several years, but they could in fact pay it. And they'd be covered for the truly exceptional, life-altering crises that insurance really should be covering in the first place. And for $400 a month apparently you can have a much lower deductible. | Recent Comments
Megthered:
"Make sure your batteries are good, too and you hav ..."
Mr Gaga: "I think our neighbors down the dirt road, we're al ..." mrp: "We have a wood fireplace but old fashion in nothin ..." AZ deplorable moron : "Prepping food: Don't forget you can buy in bulk an ..." TRex: "I think we've only had one mention of flashlights. ..." Diogenes: "Just don't eat green beans with a white fur on the ..." Skip : "We have a wood fireplace but old fashion in nothin ..." TRex: "160 Just don't eat green beans with a white fur on ..." mrp: "Don't jump on to the ice flow so fast! Buy the bo ..." Mister Scott (Formerly GWS): "A question on Canned Foods. What might be an autho ..." Diogenes: "We keep a supply of wooden stick matches. It's har ..." no one of any consequence: "Just don't eat green beans with a white fur on the ..." Recent Entries
Music Thread: The Unbearable Lightness Of Messenger Bags
Hobby Thread - October 5, 2024 [TRex] Ace of Spades Pet Thread, October 5 Gardening, Puttering and Adventure Thread, Oct. 5 What would Eric Hoffer, The Longshoreman Philosopher, be thinking about now? The Classical Saturday Morning Coffee Break & Prayer Revival Daily Tech News 5 October 2024 O*N*T The Cafe with No Name Black Female Member of Parliament Is Discovered to be an Anti-Minority Racist By Noting that "Not All Cultures Are Equal" and Saying That She Wants the UK to Embrace Western Values, Not the Third-World Values of the Country She Fled Search
Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Primary Document: The Audio
Paul Anka Haiku Contest Announcement Integrity SAT's: Entrance Exam for Paul Anka's Band AllahPundit's Paul Anka 45's Collection AnkaPundit: Paul Anka Takes Over the Site for a Weekend (Continues through to Monday's postings) George Bush Slices Don Rumsfeld Like an F*ckin' Hammer Top Top Tens
Democratic Forays into Erotica New Shows On Gore's DNC/MTV Network Nicknames for Potatoes, By People Who Really Hate Potatoes Star Wars Euphemisms for Self-Abuse Signs You're at an Iraqi "Wedding Party" Signs Your Clown Has Gone Bad Signs That You, Geroge Michael, Should Probably Just Give It Up Signs of Hip-Hop Influence on John Kerry NYT Headlines Spinning Bush's Jobs Boom Things People Are More Likely to Say Than "Did You Hear What Al Franken Said Yesterday?" Signs that Paul Krugman Has Lost His Frickin' Mind All-Time Best NBA Players, According to Senator Robert Byrd Other Bad Things About the Jews, According to the Koran Signs That David Letterman Just Doesn't Care Anymore Examples of Bob Kerrey's Insufferable Racial Jackassery Signs Andy Rooney Is Going Senile Other Judgments Dick Clarke Made About Condi Rice Based on Her Appearance Collective Names for Groups of People John Kerry's Other Vietnam Super-Pets Cool Things About the XM8 Assault Rifle Media-Approved Facts About the Democrat Spy Changes to Make Christianity More "Inclusive" Secret John Kerry Senatorial Accomplishments John Edwards Campaign Excuses John Kerry Pick-Up Lines Changes Liberal Senator George Michell Will Make at Disney Torments in Dog-Hell Greatest Hitjobs
The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny More Margaret Cho Abuse Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed" Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means Wonkette's Stand-Up Act Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report! Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet The House of Love: Paul Krugman A Michael Moore Mystery (TM) The Dowd-O-Matic! Liberal Consistency and Other Myths Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate "Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long) The Donkey ("The Raven" parody) |