Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!



Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups


NoVaMoMe 2024: 06/08/2024
Arlington, VA
Registration Is Open!


Texas MoMe 2024: 10/18/2024-10/19/2024 Corsicana,TX
Contact Ben Had for info





















« Major Federal Corruption Sting In NJ Nabs Several Elected Officials | Main | Smart, Post Racial President Trips Over His Own Mouth In "Racial" Case UPDATE: Gibbs Denies Obama Called Cops Stupid »
July 23, 2009

McChrystal's Tactical Directive for Afghanistan

NATO has released portions of the new tactical directive from Gen. McChrystal and his team. This change in policy has been controversial because it does place dangerous restrictions on the ability of our troops to hit the enemy in certain locations and situations, but it is necessary if we want to change the dynamic of that fight. The document is the outline for how coalition forces will operate in a manner consistent with both safeguarding the populace and engaging the enemy, a tightrope walk for certain. The portions released are unclassified and I will limit my commentary to these. I think that still provides a good look at the implications of this change without openly discussing how particular escalations of force would play out on the ground. Overall this directive shows why Gen. McChrystal replaced McKiernan, he articulates a population-based plan that can succeed given enough time and the support required.

Our strategic goal is to defeat the insurgency threatening the
stability of Afghanistan. Like any insurgency, there is a struggle for
the support and will of the population. Gaining and maintaining that
support must be our overriding operational imperative - and the
ultimate objective of every action we take.

We must fight the insurgents, and will use the tools at our
disposal to both defeat the enemy and protect our forces. But we will
not win based on the number of Taliban we kill, but instead on our
ability to separate insurgents from the center of gravity - the people.
That means we must respect and protect the population from coercion and
violence - and operate in a manner which will win their support.

This opening properly frames the situation we face. We have fought in Afghanistan for far too long with far too little regard for building and maintaining relationships with the many tribal and sectarian leaders and populace. There have been instances where rapport has been built and trust gained, but our rotation policies and focus on kinetic operations have eventually overcome those small victories.

The full analysis at BLACKFIVE


digg this
posted by Uncle Jimbo at 11:44 AM

| Access Comments




Recent Comments
BeckoningChasm: "So, we're not getting an ONT. ..."

polynikes: "When did Noem do this ? When she was an unknown ra ..."

PJ: "If I were Israel I would not trust Google to keep ..."

God King Barack O'Biden: "[i]206 @BigJoeBastardi 3m finally season produce ..."

Moron Robbie - feminism took women from not sweating to tits and vagina deodorant in a generation : "I will admit that I'm old enough to remember when ..."

Cicero (@cicero43): "150 My nephew spent a lot of time in India on a fo ..."

Moron Robbie - feminism took women from not sweating to tits and vagina deodorant in a generation : "I dunno maybe keep it in the house? - If tha ..."

neverenoughcaffeine : "BlackOrchid. The dog was also killing the neighbor ..."

Don Black: " 🏒 Jets @ Avalanche, game 3, top of the h ..."

Bertram Cabot, Jr.: " [i]@BigJoeBastardi 3m finally season produces a ..."

Braenyard: "That's not the first time Noem's dog acted out. P ..."

BlackOrchid: "oh well whatever we dodged a bullet. word is that ..."

Recent Entries
Search


Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64