Take Two: Let Me Explain What Sulivan Is Saying

"They look after their own, the neocons."

-- Andrew Sullivan on "the neocons" and their clannish, secret pacts with their coreligionists (Thanks to Mama AJ for the reminder on the quote.)

I was utterly unclear in my post below. Sullivan's rants are incoherent, but I understand them. But I didn't explain them well.

I was so angry about it I was just writing in anger and not explaining the reasons for that anger.

Let me do better. This is what he's saying when he both slams Fred Hiatt, Jew Neocon, for being too soft on Ahmadinejad, and also slams Charles Krauthammer, Jew Neocon, for being too hard on Ahmadinejad.

1) Sullivan slams Fred Hiatt for, among other things, publishing an article claiming that Ahmadinejad was actually ahead in polling. This was, note, not a WaPo-created article, but a guest editorial. And the WaPo linked its own blogger disputing the article.

He claims that Fred Hiatt did this on "neocon orders," because neocons want to keep Ahmadinejad in power.

Got that so far?

2) But he also slams Charles Krauthammer and other neocons/Jews for strongly criticizing Obama and demanding he support the Iranian resisters.

Got that?

Now, you'll notice those two complaints don't really make sense together.

On one hand, he asserts that Fred Hiatt is carrying Ahmadinejad's water, as Jew-neocons do.

On the other hand, he castigates Charles Krauthammer for urging a stronger administration response against Ahmadinejad. Something Jew Neocons also do.

They may seem to be incompatible and incoherent. They're not -- not exactly. They make sense if you're an anti-semite and are willing to indulge in a little wheels-within-wheels conspiracy mongering.

What Sullivan believes, and suggests in his letter from his anti-semetic friend, is that Jews are attempting to sabotage the Iranian revolution because keeping alive the Iranian "bogey man" strengthens them and allows them to continue occupying Palestinian lands.

They want Ahmadinejad in power, as it gives them the pretext that the state of Israel is threatened by Iran and so they must be allowed a free hand in Palestine.

So what of Charles Krauthammer? Isn't he a supporter of the revolution?

No. In Andrew Sullivan's account, he is a crypto-fascist who actually is intentionally, knowingly demanding that Obama pursue the wrong strategy on Iran.

Why?

Well, simple!

In order to destroy the revolution...

.... to keep the mullahs in power...

...to keep the specter of a threatening "bogey man" in Iran alive...

...to empower Israel...

...to continue its Nazi-like treatment of the Palestinians.

Get it? Again, that is all phrased according to how Andi The Anti-Semite Sullivan sees the world.

Krauthammer is not merely wrong, in Andi's account. No -- Jews are never "wrong." They're too crafty for that. Too cunning.

They don't commit mistakes-- they commit crimes.

What he's doing is lying, pretending to support the revolution while actually acting as a Jewish agent provocateur in order to destroy it.

Now, Fred Hiatt meanwhile takes orders from his neocon masters -- the same neocon masters telling Krauthammer to pretend he supports the revolution -- to spin directly (not double-fake-out reversally) onAhmadinejad's behalf.

They have an inside-outside, bad cop/good cop game going, these Jews. Some, like Hiatt, flack for Ahmadinejad directly, putting up articles Sullivan doesn't like. (I didn't like the article myself.)

Other Jew-agents support Ahmadinejad in a more crafty, duplicitous fashion, insisting that Barack Obama take the exact steps needed to give Ahmadinejad the upper hand.

And that of course is old-timey Nazi anti-semitic conspiracy theorizing, imagining these layers upon layers and Jews seeming to take different "sides" while actually secretly always taking the same side, that of their Elders of Zion masters, who engineer this whole Jew-masterpiece of deception with only a few brave Gentiles of penetrating insight and highly-trafficked one-man blogs able to see through their veils of Jewish skullduggery.

Now, that's what I was trying to say in the post below. That's why I keep saying Sullivan is claiming, like the Nazis and David Dukers and KKKers, that the Jews, even when they seem to be on your side, are actually part of a nefarious Jewish conspiracy meant to keep the Jews on top on everyone else bewildered and very much down.

And... That is the significance of the letter he prints from a reader about a conversation supposedly had with his "neocon Jewish American" friend, who actively fears a peaceful Palestinian people. The Jews want war, you see, and fear peace, just like the Jews secretly want Ahmadinejad in Teheran threatening them with nuclear missiles.

If that doesn't make sense to you, well, you just don't have one of those cunning Jew-brains, or the courageous Gentile brilliance of Andrew Sullivan to "see the truth that is in front of your nose."

Is Andi Just Saying This Because He's Got a Man-Crush on His Dream-Boy Obama? It's always hard to know -- Sullivan is so flighty and frivolous and emotive (sorry -- he's a one-man walking advertisement for gay stereotypes) that he could just be incoherently reaching for any club with which to beat on anyone who criticizes Obama.

And he's suffering from cognitive dissonance: He's a passionate supporter of both Obama and the Iranian Revolution, and his addled, demented brain is having trouble reconciling the fact that the Love of His Live actually seems to be the one flacking for Ahmadinejad, while neocon-Jews he despises actually seem to be against Ahmadinejad.

It also could be due to self-love, his unrelenting, insatiable narcissism. He wants himself to be the most passionate supporter of the Iranian uprising in America, and so when Charles Krauthammer appears to be an even more passionate supporter, saying crazy things like "Barack Obama should support the uprising," Sullivan needs some way to explain that Krauthammer is actually not what he seems.

Krauthammer seems to be more forward-leaning than Sullivan? Easily explained: He's actually supporting Ahmadinejad, deliberately, trying to trick guileless Gentiles into taking steps that will undermine the protesters. An agent provocateur.

Andrew Sullivan's narcissistic, demented worldview will not admit of someone being "more right" than he is. He must come up with some mechanism by which the only two people who have it exactly right are Andrew Sullivan and his dreamlover Barack Hussein Obama.

(And, oh: Ron Paul too (!!11!!11!eleventy!))

So perhaps in his delicate, demented state, he just reaches for any method by which to square this circle.

Faking-up a shifty, ruthless enemy of enormous power and secret influence who kinda-sorta explains this odd situation is always a popular solution.

And Jews have fulfilled that role for a long, long time.

And so they are pressed into service yet again.

If you need to unite very disparate groups and policies... well, just claim the Jews are somehow pulling the strings to keep you all divided, to keep you scattered. Works like a charm.

But even if Sullivan began pushing his anti-semitism out of love (the greatest love of all -- the love for Barack Hussein Obama, or the other greatest love of all -- the love of Andrew Sullivan), it doesn't absolve him.

For whatever reason, starting with love or starting with hate, he ends with hate, and so joins long legions of emotionally-unstable and politically-incoherent dreamers of a better world -- a world without the mazes and machinations of Jewish Elders -- who came before him.

And... Both Hiatt and Goldberg are, I trust, smart enough to know all this. So when they say they can't "understand" what Sullivan is saying -- of course they can. They are just too polite to lay the anti-semite charge down and, perhaps, a bit reluctant to do so, because calling brave exposers of Jewish conspiracies, like Sullivan, "anti-semitic" is precisely the sort of thing you'd expect agents of the Elders of Zion to do.

What a giveaway, as they say on Monty Python.

So, you know, I'll say so. I am safely, nonthreateningly Christian by birth and by culture. Not a drop of that crafty, conspiratorial blood in me.

Never even met one of the Elders of Zion.

Andrew Sullivan is a crypto-nazi, period, end sentence, end paragraph, end of file.

posted by Ace at 06:43 PM

| Access Comments