Intermarkets' Privacy Policy

Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!

Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

« Evidence That Obama Picked the Chrysler Dealerships to be Closed? | Main | Justice Alito Politely Twits Liberal Justices for Hypocrisy »
May 26, 2009

How Hard Should Republicans And Conservatives Fight Sotomayor?

Pretty damn hard in my opinion.

It’s a given that the left will try and package this pick as non-confrontational and historic. In fact, that process has already begun.

But Obama has chosen a mainstream progressive, rather than a wild-eyed liberal. And he has chosen a rags-to-riches Hispanic woman. Her life story is inspirational — a political consultant's dream. Since she is certain to be confirmed, there are plenty of smart conservatives who will, by midday Tuesday, have done the political cost-benefit analysis: at a time when Republicans are trying to demonstrate that their party can reach beyond rich white men, what mileage is there in doing anything but celebrating such a historic choice?

The White House plans to take the high road in selling Sotomayor to the public. They will point to her résumé, her previous Senate confirmation and her impeccable credentials to make a case for her. Obama's aides are so confident in the political pluses of this pick that some of them would welcome attempts by fringe conservatives to come after her. A few would even like liberals to attack her as insufficiently committed to their causes.

No doubt some squishy Republicans will claim we will alienate Hispanics if we oppose her. Funny but that wasn’t so much a concern to Democrats when they savaged Miguel Estrada and kept him off the Court of Appeals and foreclose any chance he had to be named to the Supreme Court.

The Democrats, including then Senator Barack Obama, have made it perfectly clear over the years that good character, outstanding educational credentials and relevant experience are not enough.

As we all know, there's been a lot of discussion in the country about how the Senate should approach this confirmation process. There are some who believe that the President, having won the election, should have the complete authority to appoint his nominee, and the Senate should only examine whether or not the Justice is intellectually capable and an all-around nice guy. That once you get beyond intellect and personal character, there should be no further question whether the judge should be confirmed.

I disagree with this view. I believe firmly that the Constitution calls for the Senate to advise and consent. I believe that it calls for meaningful advice and consent that includes an examination of a judge's philosophy, ideology, and record. And when I examine the philosophy, ideology, and record of Samuel Alito, I'm deeply troubled.

I have no doubt that Judge Alito has the training and qualifications necessary to serve. He's an intelligent man and an accomplished jurist. And there's no indication he's not a man of great character.

Obama voted against Alito.

Baring something unforeseen in her background (and let’s not forget, the Obama vetting team isn’t exactly batting a thousand), Sotomayor is going to be confirmed.

As Gabe has begun to lay out below, Sotomayor is clearly a hard left activist judge who thinks minority judges have special knowledge and empathy based on nothing more than their own experiences and heritage. She and Obama clearly think those are more relevant than an impartial application of the law.

But what the Republicans and conservatives must do is use this opportunity to layout what they believe in when it comes to the proper role of judges in our system. They should put Senators from nominally ‘red states’ like Ben Nelson, Byron Dorgan and Blanche Lincoln into the uncomfortable position of defending and pushing this very liberal activist judge over the top.

There's also the benefit of laying down a marker. If Sotomayor gets through without a fight the perception will be that this type of 'progressive' judging is mainstream and acceptable. Obviously liberals think it is but this is a fairly bright line distinction between the parties. People always say Republicans and Democrats are the same, there's no difference between the two. Well judicial philosophy and role of the courts clearly is one big difference and an important one. We should not shy away from making that case, even if we are doomed to fail in the Senate.

Also, Democrats must know the days of them opposing Republican nominees while Republicans support the likes of Ginsburg, Breyer and now Sotomayor are over. The Democrats have been playing tackle football since the Bork nomination while the Republicans have been playing flag football. No more and the game changes now.

It will be good to stop fighting each other and get back to fighting the left.

More: Gabe sends this along...only 7 Republicans voted for Sotomayor when she was confirmed to the Second Circuit.

Sens. Robert Bennett (R-Utah), Thad Cochran (R-Miss.), Susan Collins (R-Maine), Orrin hosta (R-Utah), Judd Gregg (R-N.H.), Richard Lugar (R-Ind.) and Olympia Snowe (R-Maine) joined a unanimous slate of Dems in pushing Sotomayor through by a vote of 68-28.

Among the 29 Republican nays were current Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Kent.), Minority Whip John Kyl (R-Ariz.), ranking Judiciary Committee member Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.) and John McCain (R-Ariz.).

If you couldn't get John McCain....

Added [Gabe]: Senate Dems are at 59 votes, so they only need one squish to switch. Who's going to jump fastest, Collins or Snowe? Or maybe they'll have a joint press conference.

DrewM. Again: Gabe adds a good note about the filibuster. Personally, I don't think Republicans should go that far. Republicans spent a lot of time making the case that filibusters shouldn't be used against Supreme Court nominees. I think they were right, a nominee should get an up or down vote. I think Republicans should play hard ball but such naked intellectual dishonesty is best left to the Democrats.

Early Republican reaction. Not a good sign. They should have been ready to go from the start. Kennedy didn't wait before launching his "In Robert Bork's America..." shit. I'm not saying that Republicans should slander Sotomayor like Kennedy did Bork but being ready from the first moment is important. Being statesman like is admirable at times, this is not one of those times. Being honest, fair and tough is what we need now, not in a few weeks.

digg this
posted by DrewM. at 10:07 AM

| Access Comments

Recent Comments
The Button Down Mind: "Bob Newhart is, was, and forevermore shall be, the ..."

80's music fan: "Tell us you have never met a democrat without tell ..."

LinusVanPelt : "Joe Biden: Is it live or is it memorex?? ..."

BruceWayne: "I love ya kid. Things Joe has never said to Kamala ..."

TheJamesMadison, riding the anarchy train with John Landis: "454 Boy the "chaotic" "out of control" Democrat pa ..."

no one of any consequence: "Last time I checked, and it was about 40 years ago ..."

...: "Over under on when we see the first Che style Kama ..."

Minnfidel: "I love ya kid. Things Joe has never said to Kamala ..."

runner: "BREAKING 🚨 The Whitehouse Gets Caught Usin ..."

SMOD: "First Lady Paris-Bound for Olympics to Lead Americ ..."

Warai-otoko : "Endorse is one of those words that loses its meani ..."

...: "Boy the "chaotic" "out of control" Democrat party ..."

Recent Entries

Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64