Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups






















« AIG Resignation Letter | Main | Tim Geithner...Dumber Than A Box Of Rocks (With All Due Apologies To Boxes And Rocks) »
March 25, 2009

Barney Frank...Not All Opponents Of Same Sex Marriage Are Homophobic But Yeah, Scalia Is Definitely Is

Barney Frank recently took a few minute from screwing up the country's financial system to call Justice Scalia a "homophobe". I skipped posting on it because, well, Frank says a lot of stupid shit and who can keep track of it all?

But yesterday he doubled down on it. Frank graciously acknowledged that opposition to same sex marriage is not ipso facto proof of homophobia but Scallia? Yeah, he hates teh gheys.

"What a 'homophobe' means is someone who has prejudice about gay people," Frank told WBZ radio, arguing that Scalia's judicial writing "makes it very clear that he's angry, frankly, about the existence of gay people."

In particular, Frank cited Scalia's opinion in the 2003 case Lawrence v. Texas, in which the Supreme Court struck down state laws barring consensual acts of sodomy. In his dissent, Scalia wrote that the 6-3 vote served to ratify an "agenda promoted by some homosexual activists directed at eliminating the moral opprobrium that has traditionally attached to homosexual conduct."

"If you read his opinion, he thinks it's a good idea for two consenting adults who happen to be gay to be locked up because he is so disapproving of gay people," Frank said yesterday.

Barney, you are an idiot. Based on the dissent it's quite clear that what Scalia thinks is the Constitution doesn't prohibit states from enacting such laws. His personal opinion on such laws are not anywhere in evidence in the opinion. As usual Scalia is scathing in his language but his target is the sloppy thinking and writing of his fellow justices, led by His Royal Highness, The Duke of Kennedy.

Frank claims that Clarence Thomas isn't a homophobe because Thomas said that while he would uphold the Texas statute he would have voted against the law were he a legislator.

Well, here's part of what Scalia wrote in his dissent (which Thomas joined).


Let me be clear that I have nothing against homosexuals, or any other group, promoting their agenda through normal democratic means. Social perceptions of sexual and other morality change over time, and every group has the right to persuade its fellow citizens that its view of such matters is the best. That homosexuals have achieved some success in that enterprise is attested to by the fact that Texas is one of the few remaining States that criminalize private, consensual homosexual acts. But persuading one’s fellow citizens is one thing, and imposing one’s views in absence of democratic majority will is something else. I would no more require a State to criminalize homosexual acts–or, for that matter, display any moral disapprobation of them–than I would forbid it to do so.

If that makes you a homophobe, I'm affraid I have to sign up for the club. Fortunately, that's only the case in Barney Frank's tiny little brain and not reality.

One more thought....

I honestly wonder if Frank has read the dissent. It reminds me of the time Harry Reid called Clarence Thomas "an embarrassment" whose "opinions are poorly written".

When pressed for an example, old Harry came up with "the Hillside Dairy case" which he said was the work of 8th grader. Here is Thomas' dissent from that case in full.

I join Parts I and III of the Court's opinion and respectfully dissent from Part II, which holds that §144 of the Federal Agriculture Improvement and Reform Act of 1996, 7 U.S.C. §7254, "does not clearly express an intent to insulate California's pricing and pooling laws from a Commerce Clause challenge." Ante, at 6-7. Although I agree that the Court of Appeals erred in its statutory analysis, I nevertheless would affirm its judgment on this claim because "[t]he negative Commerce Clause has no basis in the text of the Constitution, makes little sense, and has proved virtually unworkable in application," Camps Newfound/Owatonna, Inc. v. Town of Harrison, 520 U.S. 564, 610 (1997) (Thomas, J., dissenting), and, consequently, cannot serve as a basis for striking down a state statute.

Liberals like to say and think they are super geniuses. In reality they tend to be moronic name callers.

digg this
posted by DrewM. at 11:09 AM

| Access Comments




Recent Comments
JackStraw: ">>Bay State Road, lol. Yea, I figured. Beacon S ..."

Deplorable Ian Galt: " I know some younger ones who don't like to drive ..."

Scarymary: "I know some younger ones who don't like to drive a ..."

Tammy-al Thor: "I think there's some sort of cabal bent on destroy ..."

runner: "Teleportation would make things more efficient. ..."

Deplorable Ian Galt: ">>My frat was near there, one block from where the ..."

runner: "I don't like to drive. Waste of time. ..."

Deplorable Ian Galt: "Son was complaining that the tounger generation do ..."

JackStraw: ">>My frat was near there, one block from where the ..."

publius, Rascally Mr. Miley (w6EFb): " I've screamed at the TV, "Run lady, run! It's ..."

Scarymary: "I'll believe that 20% of Xers can muddle their way ..."

Deplorable Ian Galt: "Right in the middle of Kenmore Square around the c ..."

Recent Entries
Search


Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64